[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days

Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it.

Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict.


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Cal Thomas: Unions, overregulation drove American Dream into a ditch
Source: SacBee
URL Source: http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/1920481.html
Published: Jun 5, 2009
Author: Cal Thomas
Post Date: 2009-06-05 16:06:01 by farmfriend
Keywords: None
Views: 5649
Comments: 137

Cal Thomas: Unions, overregulation drove American Dream into a ditch

By Cal Thomas
Published: Friday, Jun. 5, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 19A

See the USA in your Chevrolet

America is asking you to call.

Drive your Chevrolet through the USA

America's the greatest land of all.

Fifty years ago, those words set to music each week on NBC's "The Dinah Shore Show" reflected an America and an automobile industry that is no more. That time and that industry were laid to rest this week when General Motors filed for bankruptcy and the government effectively nationalized GM and Chrysler after wasting billions of our tax dollars on a failed bailout.

Despite disclaimers from President Barack Obama that the government doesn't want to be in the car business, it is hard to see what it has bought with our tax dollars other than two of what used to be known as "the big three."

Government by default or determination will choose the types of cars the companies it owns will make. Government will buy a lot of them because not enough customers will unless they are made offers they can't refuse, not by a car salesman in a loud sport coat, but by a government bureaucrat in a suit.

It's difficult to let go of an American dream. When I was growing up, every kid wanted to drive his own car. Our frugal parents (who had just one car) would let us drive it, but with restrictions, including a set time to bring the car back in the same pristine condition in which we found it.

A car was a rite of passage. It conveyed independence and status.

Each September we salivated at the prospect of new models. There was always a big buildup and we'd go to the Chevy (or Ford) dealer early on the morning they were for sale. Sometimes they would be covered with sheets and a dramatic unveiling would take place. TV commercials would show parts of new models in a kind of striptease before their debut.

Some believe the models between 1955 and 1959, especially the 1957 Chevy Bel Air and the 1958 Impala, are unsurpassed, though Ford devotees have their Mustangs and T-Birds. Pontiac's GTO and some Dodge and Plymouth models were also great.

Chrysler had the Imperial, which resembled a boat with running lights, and the New Yorker for "old rich people." And then there was the one beyond our reach, but not beyond our dreams: the Cadillac. The song "Pink Cadillac" became a hit, in part because we saw Elvis in one.

America's relationship with its cars has rightly been called a love affair. Though some have tried to replicate the smell of a new car in spray cans, there is nothing quite like the feeling of sinking into new faux leather and later, if you could afford it, the real thing.

Much if not all of those thrills will be gone, thanks to greed by the unions, government overregulation and bad management. The customers, who once were always right, have been cheated.

All one has to do is look at government-made cars to see they are about as attractive as government art, government architecture, or many other things government does poorly. The Skoda (when the Czechoslovakia communist party made them – they're nice now thanks to free-market capitalism) had its own jokes: "How much is a Skoda worth with a full tank of gas?" Answer: "Twice as much."

East Germany's Trabant, a major polluter, was little more than a two-cycle engine encased in the thinnest veneer, and the old Soviet Union cars were about as appealing as a Siberian winter. These are the kinds of cars governments have produced.

Obama says all of those laid-off autoworkers will have to "sacrifice" for the sake of their children and grandchildren. So much for their American Dream. If a Republican president had said that, he would have been denounced as insensitive and uncaring.

On a highway, or a road along the levee

Performance is sweeter

Nothing can beat her

Life is completer in a Chevy.

Not anymore.

Bye-bye Miss American Pie;

drove my Chevy to the levee but the levee was dry.

This is the day GM died.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

#2. To: farmfriend (#0)

Unions,

Cal was not around when ...Henry Ford...had men shot for wanting a piece of the dream.

By the way Cal, Ford like the Rockefellers et al, left BILLIONS behind to try and engineer a better society.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-06-05   16:56:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Cynicom (#2)

Why the hell is it always the unions fault and never management?

Lady X  posted on  2009-06-05   17:16:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Lady X (#3)

Why the hell is it always the unions fault and never management?

Ever try and get a teacher or a cop fired? The unions defend the indefensible.

mirage  posted on  2009-06-05   20:31:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: mirage (#9)

Without unions, good or bad, there would never have been a middle class in America.

True, unions protect the malingerers as well as the hard working employee.

What is the alternative??? We would go back to child labor, and many of the elite of this country are well know for having made their fortunes from the backs of children.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-06-05   20:42:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Cynicom (#10)

True, unions protect the malingerers as well as the hard working employee.

Like child molesters and embezzlers. They have long outlived most of their usefulness.

True, they are needed in some professions like mining and blasting where there is serious chance of injury, but most union members are Government employees these days.

So tell me, with the vast majority (read: 90%+) of union members being Government employees, are they truly still needed to protect the IRS agent who just stole your house, the cop who planted a bag of weed on your child, and the teacher who was caught sleeping with your son?

mirage  posted on  2009-06-05   22:28:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: mirage (#23)

So tell me, with the vast majority (read: 90%+) of union members being Government employees, are they truly still needed to protect the IRS agent who just stole your house, the cop who planted a bag of weed on your child, and the teacher who was caught sleeping with your son?

Having once been a Union member and employed by the government, I have a little knowledge on that subject.

In the olde days we had no union, needed none and then after 1960 there abouts, things changed, the government was setting all the rules and we had no recourse.

It was for self protection that Unions came about.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-06-05   22:37:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Cynicom, mirage (#25)

things changed, the government was setting all the rules and we had no recourse.

Except the freedom to find a different job if you didn't like the one you had.

farmfriend  posted on  2009-06-05   22:58:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: farmfriend, mirage, tom007, wbales, bluegrass (#28)

When monopolies control access to labor, the people struggle to find a way to deal with the situation. I prefer not to work union, but I understand why people have gone that way, and stayed. It becomes a family tradition. Abuse of the workers is what brought out the need.

The right has only served to protect the monopolies with its union busting.

Break up the multinational conglomerates, and the need for unions would probably subside.

What passes for the American left or the right: it doesn't matter. The traditional language used to describe political factions and viewpoints all lead back to the same thing: great masses of power and wealth accumulated where it doesn't belong, and moving away from the citizens quickly.

Deasy  posted on  2009-06-05   23:31:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Deasy (#30)

The right has only served to protect the monopolies with its union busting.

You do realize that Unions are monopolies.

mirage  posted on  2009-06-05   23:58:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: mirage (#31)

Good point. But I will say that one bad deed begets another.

Deasy  posted on  2009-06-05   23:59:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Deasy (#32)

Good point. But I will say that one bad deed begets another.

Unions started in the pre-WWI era. Are you really arguing that everything is the same now that it was One Hundred Years ago?

mirage  posted on  2009-06-06   0:00:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: mirage (#33)

Worse, because the dollar is even less reliable than it was then.

Deasy  posted on  2009-06-06   0:06:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Deasy (#34)

Worse, because the dollar is even less reliable than it was then.

So why are you arguing to keep things 100 years in the past and saying "Its probably a good idea" ?

mirage  posted on  2009-06-06   0:30:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: mirage (#35)

No one can "keep" a union except the workers. It's really up to them. If they think it helps them, they'll probably do it. It may hurt them in the long run, but that's how it goes.

I'll point out that unions took root after the industrial revolution had turned to militarization, and when we had committed to empire. Around the same time, the Fabians nationalized our public lands and curtailed homesteading.

We talk about the symptoms. They just don't matter as much as the root causes do.

Deasy  posted on  2009-06-06   0:34:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Deasy (#37)

No one can "keep" a union except the workers.

That is incorrect given the NLRB and how Union Bosses operate through intimidation.

Federal Law protects and enhances Unions. You should look into it some time.

In many States, workers have no choice but to join a union and then have little say in what happens to the union dues that they are then forced to pay.

For example, the 'benefits' that unions negotiate are typically of a one-size-fits-all type. Like Health Insurance. Where I am, the local teachers' union did a marvelous job of it. You pay $1000 per month or more regardless of how many people you place on the policy. Single people pay $1000. Families of 20 pay $1000.

Oh, and did I mention its a closed shop so you have no choice in the matter but to sign on for the whole kit and kaboodle?

mirage  posted on  2009-06-06   11:37:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: mirage, farmfriend, Cynicom (#43)

Oh, and did I mention its a closed shop so you have no choice in the matter but to sign on for the whole kit and kaboodle?

You can always look for a job somewhere else, or start your own company.

Deasy  posted on  2009-06-06   11:43:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Deasy (#44)

You can always look for a job somewhere else, or start your own company.

Funny thing, that. I actually tried that once.

The price tag was over $50k before we actually did anything - and that was in Government fees, regulatory compliance matters, and such.

Still think that throwing a lot of people "in the way" is a good idea?

mirage  posted on  2009-06-06   11:55:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: mirage (#45)

The price tag was over $50k before we actually did anything - and that was in Government fees, regulatory compliance matters, and such.

So we're back to the original problem, aren't we? You can't fix the problem by addressing the symptoms. Unions are a symptom.

Deasy  posted on  2009-06-06   11:57:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Deasy (#46)

You can't fix the problem by addressing the symptoms. Unions are a symptom.

Unions are not a symptom.

Unions pressure Government to put into place ridiculous rules that restrict competition.

They CAUSE problems. Going back, the real solution is to whack Government back to practically nothing, but, over time, it would simply grow back again because pressure groups like Unions would simply re-invent the same crap we have today.

Thus, you have to deal with the problems as they arise while chopping back Government.

My hope is that the current collapse in tax revenues will cause Government to shrink.

mirage  posted on  2009-06-06   12:49:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: mirage (#53)

Unions are not a symptom.

I disagree, and I think this position is part of the phony left/right divide. The left inculcates its adherents that unions are their only recourse to hated capitalists who are out to deprive them of the value of their labor. The right inculcates its adherents into believing that companies have a right to defend themselves against organized labor. Meanwhile, America's industries are collapsing. You all can act out on the stage, pointing fingers at each other, but I'm looking for the man behind the curtain.

Deasy  posted on  2009-06-06   12:52:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Deasy (#54)

You all can act out on the stage, pointing fingers at each other, but I'm looking for the man behind the curtain.

You won't find one. There is no single 'man' to track down with all of this.

What you will find is a basic fact of human nature; people want others to obey them. Its that simple and it is historical.

The SYMPTOM of the problem is the result of this.

The CAUSE is people getting together, acting like a biker gang, and shaking others down - legally, of course.

The CURE is Liberty.

Unions are just gangs of organized thugs.

mirage  posted on  2009-06-06   13:00:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 55.

#60. To: mirage (#55)

The CAUSE is people getting together, acting like a biker gang, and shaking others down - legally, of course.

I see a more complex variation of this analogy. Some powerful people who own and control the press, can afford to lobby congress, steer the direction of public education, and even influence foreign trade and diplomacy, create the illusion that shakedowns are going to help the ordinary people. They got their wealth by analyzing how our system works and gaming it for a century and a half.

Where the shakedown bureaucracies are established, more power is transferred to the powerful people, who manage to steer the shakedown machine toward their affiliated banks when the shakedown machines run out of money.

The CURE is Liberty.
Liberty without protection for the interests of the people, will only lead to the same place we are today. The old saying that a democratic society will only remain free until the people discover that they can vote benefits for themselves is incomplete. The main threat in any free society is corporatism. It's a dilemma because no matter who is in power, wealth transfer becomes a part of the process, all in the name of democratic values.

Given a choice between strictly limited government and what we have today, I will take limited government. But I fully understand that the cycle will repeat itself given conditions of "pure liberty." Pure liberty can easily be gamed. What's more, partisan politics can easily distract people from that fact on both sides. The left wants one type of freedom and the right wants another. Meanwhile, we're not really free. We won't be until we learn to think in new ways.

Deasy  posted on  2009-06-06 14:55:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]