See other 4play Articles
Title: (Pic) Beauty and the Beast
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 8, 2009
Author: good lord
Post Date: 2009-06-08 10:24:37 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 725
Comments: 39
Poster Comment:
I realize I'm well past my Hate Crime quota for the month, but holy shit, she's a beast.
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 37.
#11. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
That's envy in her face.
Envy tempered with racial hatred? Or is it only whites that are racists? I forget.
Envy is hatred. The dumb cluck is First Lady and it's still not good enough for her.
Look of hatred? Looks like a blank stare to me. Could there be some 'Projection' in the interpretations of Mrs. Obama and her facial expressions? I have never known a mind reader, the only guy in memory who thought he could divine properly the inner workings of the mind was Freud and he was huckster, yet now everyone is so imparted with clairvoyance they know what Mrs. Obama is thinking. Have sat through a thing or two, she might also be thinking when is this over? This woman next to me should have used deodorant. Some Reflexivity could be employed now. We should apply everything we accuse of others to ourselves, at least as an exercise in honesty.
Really????? Most people here have the intelligence and life's experience to read what the photo shows.
Well, We have at least two interpretations and no guarantee that any are right. But your claim isn't sound on three counts: we have no guarantee that most agree with you (your presumption) and even if they did that they have the intelligence and life's experience to read the photo 'shows', or that intelligence and life's experience makes anyone an expert at reading photos. I think you are likely trying to appeal to the masses by flattery verging on logical fallacy. Take Stephen Jay Gould, his pop-sci put science back forty years with his popularity and appeals and slights.
And I think that you're someone who has sex with darkies.
Why should that matter? Are you some kind of purest? Any group that doesn't allow for change is sowing the seeds of its own destruction. I don't advocate it nor discourage it, because a static gene pool is Death just like what happened to the American Indians, but central planning such a thing is a different Death. I tend think a purest is one whom advocates racially purity to promote their reproductive opportunities by coercion instead of by competition. That is they lack enough inherit value to be naturally appealing to a mate, and probably don't have the industry to gather wealth, another way substandard men still get to reproduce, or to play an instrument on and on.
I don't know about Hounddawg, aka mangy, flea-bitten, worm-ridden mutt, but I certainly am a purist. Blacks have a brain that is on average five cubic inches smaller than whites. That's why in Africa the average IQ is 70, and in America, 85, which is still, before these days of PC, what was called "moron." It's why blacks have never had anything near a civilization. They have nothing to offer whites genetically except stupidity and criminality.
If that is the case then wouldn't an approach based on pure competition be the best way to deal with that issue? By actually guaranteeing equality for all the best genes of the total pool should express themselves over time. Over time the laissez-fair approach should let the best reproduce the most. Here is a question: why have whites on the whole become so effeminate over the last 60-70 years?
There are no replies to Comment # 37. End Trace Mode for Comment # 37.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#12. To: Turtle (#11)
That's envy in her face.
#13. To: Cynicom (#12)
Envy tempered with racial hatred?
#14. To: Turtle (#13)
#15. To: Honesty (#14)
We should apply everything we accuse of others to ourselves, at least as an exercise in honesty.
#21. To: Cynicom (#15)
#25. To: Honesty, Cynicom, Jthro Tull, christine (#21)
I think you are likely trying to appeal to the masses by flattery verging on logical fallacy.
#27. To: HOUNDDAWG (#25)
#28. To: Honesty, HOUNDDAWG (#27)
Are you some kind of purest?
#30. To: Turtle (#28)
#37. To: Honesty (#30)
Here is a question: why have whites on the whole become so effeminate over the last 60-70 years?
Replies to Comment # 37.