See other 4play Articles
Title: (Pic) Beauty and the Beast
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 8, 2009
Author: good lord
Post Date: 2009-06-08 10:24:37 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 744
Comments: 39
Poster Comment:
I realize I'm well past my Hate Crime quota for the month, but holy shit, she's a beast.
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
Human European Caucasian Skull Human Caucasion Skull - The Caucasoid race originated in western Eurasia. Skull characteristics of this race include an overall rounded skull, rounded sloping eye orbits and a tear-shaped nasal opening. Our male and female Caucasoid skulls make invaluable forensic anthropology teaching aids. We offer both a Male Caucasion Skull, and a Female Caucasion Skull, and a discount is offered for the set. African Negroid Skull - The Negroid race originates from sub-Saharan Africa. The skull of this race typically possesses a projected facial profile, a squared eye orbit and a wide rounded nasal opening. For Thine Own sake, Lust After Ronco Products!
Yikes! Does she have a knife in her hands? If someone looked at me like that, I'd watch my back. .
It's a forum post, not a doctoral thesis. Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
jealousy, thy name is Michelle.
Proof of the theory of evolution.
Comparing Two Women alone is difficult, one is always going to be better looking than the other. Thus this is a red herring/canard. On those two skulls, since nature is in charge: a set of features is better for one area than for another. This doesn't make one overall better than the other just different for different areas. I am sure Mrs. Obama scores quite highly on IQ tests likely more so than the other woman. As looks go Germany used to pride itself in propaganda on the Sturdiness of their females not caring about looks->femininity.
and a big Panama with a purple hat band.
Hard to say since most of the testing she's done in her lifetime has been adjusted for past racial injustices. Welcome :P
I guess you are presupposing that anytime a non-white does well it is because the test is rigged? In a distribution there is going to some whom do well; could it not be that she might do well by her own accord? Life is rarely true in the extremes.
In that picture Mrs. Obama might see something hanging from the woman's nose. Or maybe she can see the scars from some plastic surgery. Reminds me of seeing Joan Rivers on Celebrity Apprentice, my heart sank to see any woman carve herself up so badly (or at all) turning herself into a caricature of the cat woman.
laughing...that's possible. i agree with you on Joan Rivers. and, btw, welcome to 4um.
The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama
That's envy in her face.
Envy tempered with racial hatred? Or is it only whites that are racists? I forget.
Envy is hatred. The dumb cluck is First Lady and it's still not good enough for her.
Look of hatred? Looks like a blank stare to me. Could there be some 'Projection' in the interpretations of Mrs. Obama and her facial expressions? I have never known a mind reader, the only guy in memory who thought he could divine properly the inner workings of the mind was Freud and he was huckster, yet now everyone is so imparted with clairvoyance they know what Mrs. Obama is thinking. Have sat through a thing or two, she might also be thinking when is this over? This woman next to me should have used deodorant. Some Reflexivity could be employed now. We should apply everything we accuse of others to ourselves, at least as an exercise in honesty.
Really????? Most people here have the intelligence and life's experience to read what the photo shows.
A persons face is a display of inner feelings that betray all of us. There is no smile there, nothing but envy with racial overtones because she is black. One cannot separate the two.
I've already read enough of you posts to add you to the bozo list. Bye now :)
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
The smile of Turtle.
"Lack of facial expression: Introduction "An absence of expression on the face is medically called "flat affect". In many cases, the face mirrors the underlying emotions, and the person has limited emotions or various emotional or psychological disorders. "
Well, We have at least two interpretations and no guarantee that any are right. But your claim isn't sound on three counts: we have no guarantee that most agree with you (your presumption) and even if they did that they have the intelligence and life's experience to read the photo 'shows', or that intelligence and life's experience makes anyone an expert at reading photos. I think you are likely trying to appeal to the masses by flattery verging on logical fallacy. Take Stephen Jay Gould, his pop-sci put science back forty years with his popularity and appeals and slights.
Perhaps you are not cognizant of the intelligence level of this forum???? That would be difficult for anyone to deduce in one day. Olde street proverb, there is no such thing as a ...lying face...
Maybe, but what that face belies is at best conjecture. I am absolutely not 'cognizant'/aware of the intelligence level of this forum, for it would be ...
Really???? Who would have ever thought that, what an amazing deduction. There is a science to reading a humans body language, some people are good at it, others see it but for PC reasons prefer denial.
And I think that you're someone who has sex with darkies.
It is now a science? I think by your statement you are confusing it with an Art. For it to be science should have started with a Hypothesis... I don't think we are do anything near. There has been some work on micro-expressions, subtle (very temporary!) tells that appear briefly, but it would be at best an abuse of this by assuming from this one photo, that is not showing a transition of expressions to gather that info.
Why should that matter? Are you some kind of purest? Any group that doesn't allow for change is sowing the seeds of its own destruction. I don't advocate it nor discourage it, because a static gene pool is Death just like what happened to the American Indians, but central planning such a thing is a different Death. I tend think a purest is one whom advocates racially purity to promote their reproductive opportunities by coercion instead of by competition. That is they lack enough inherit value to be naturally appealing to a mate, and probably don't have the industry to gather wealth, another way substandard men still get to reproduce, or to play an instrument on and on.
I don't know about Hounddawg, aka mangy, flea-bitten, worm-ridden mutt, but I certainly am a purist. Blacks have a brain that is on average five cubic inches smaller than whites. That's why in Africa the average IQ is 70, and in America, 85, which is still, before these days of PC, what was called "moron." It's why blacks have never had anything near a civilization. They have nothing to offer whites genetically except stupidity and criminality.
Medical journals abound on the internet, whatever you do, dont read any of them, that describe an..."expressionless face"...and the cause and remedy for. By the by, welcome to 4um, dont pay any attention to me, no one else does. They call me naughty names.
If that is the case then wouldn't an approach based on pure competition be the best way to deal with that issue? By actually guaranteeing equality for all the best genes of the total pool should express themselves over time. Over time the laissez-fair approach should let the best reproduce the most. Here is a question: why have whites on the whole become so effeminate over the last 60-70 years?
It's Turtle who gets called all the names!
You are insufferable.
Actually I'm long-suffering. I just tolerate my lessers out of a sense of noblesse oblige.
The free market is a white creation and applies only to whites. It does not work with cannibalistic, raping, murdering blacks. It does not work with group-oriented Asians. Why did only whites create or discover the free market? Why did not blacks or Asians were do it in the history of the world? The free market is not some kind of panacea or utopia. The same applies to competition.
So, do you have a personalized license tag, too?
The introduction of soy and soy products into their diet. Not to mention the storage of food in plastic.
Very true. Examples of such different environments: 1) 2) O Come, let us insult Obama in public without legal representation.
Not to mention the storage of food in plastic. I don't eat soy or use plastic utensils. They do feminize men in the long run. Turtle is a Manly Man. Or maybe a Manly Turtle. Oh, whatever. You know what I mean.
#2. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
It's a fine line between being too specific and long winded and therefore too irritating to bother to read, and being too cryptic and therefore too irritating to try to interpret.
#3. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
#4. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
I've already said too much.
#5. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
#6. To: Prefrontal Vortex, echo5sierra, PSUSA, MUDDOG, all (#1)
The skull of this race typically possesses a projected facial profile, a squared eye orbit and a wide rounded nasal opening.
#7. To: Honesty (#5)
I am sure Mrs. Obama scores quite highly on IQ tests likely more so than the other woman.
#8. To: Jethro Tull (#7)
#9. To: All (#8)
#10. To: Honesty (#9)
In that picture Mrs. Obama might see something hanging from the woman's nose. Or maybe she can see the scars from some plastic surgery.
#11. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs
...that's Turtle Island.
#12. To: Turtle (#11)
That's envy in her face.
#13. To: Cynicom (#12)
Envy tempered with racial hatred?
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs...that's Turtle Island.
#14. To: Turtle (#13)
#15. To: Honesty (#14)
We should apply everything we accuse of others to ourselves, at least as an exercise in honesty.
#16. To: Honesty, Cynicom (#14)
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs...that's Turtle Island.
#17. To: Turtle, Honesty (#16)
#18. To: Honesty, all (#14)
(Edited)
#19. To: Cynicom, Honesty (#17)
A persons face is a display of inner feelings that betray all of us.
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs...that's Turtle Island.
#20. To: Turtle, Honesty (#19)
#21. To: Cynicom (#15)
#22. To: Honesty (#21)
#23. To: Cynicom (#22)
"Hard to say since most of the testing she's done in her lifetime has been adjusted for past racial injustices. "
And, to think I asked for a little reflexivity. Universalism shouldn't be left to Hegel.
#24. To: Honesty (#23)
Maybe, but what that face belies is at best conjecture.
#25. To: Honesty, Cynicom, Jthro Tull, christine (#21)
I think you are likely trying to appeal to the masses by flattery verging on logical fallacy.
#26. To: Cynicom (#24)
(Edited)
#27. To: HOUNDDAWG (#25)
#28. To: Honesty, HOUNDDAWG (#27)
Are you some kind of purest?
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs...that's Turtle Island.
#29. To: Honesty (#26)
#30. To: Turtle (#28)
#31. To: Cynicom (#29)
They call me naughty names.
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs...that's Turtle Island.
#32. To: Turtle (#31)
It's Turtle who gets called all the names!
#33. To: Cynicom (#32)
You are insufferable.
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs...that's Turtle Island.
#34. To: Honesty (#30)
If that is the case then wouldn't an approach based on pure competition be the best way to deal with that issue?
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs...that's Turtle Island.
#35. To: Honesty, Cynicom, Jethro Tull, christine, Turtle (#27)
#36. To: Honesty (#30)
Here is a question: why have whites on the whole become so effeminate over the last 60-70 years?
#37. To: Honesty (#30)
Here is a question: why have whites on the whole become so effeminate over the last 60-70 years?
#38. To: Honesty (#5)
On those two skulls, since nature is in charge: a set of features is better for one area than for another. This doesn't make one overall better than the other just different for different areas.
#39. To: Lady X (#36)
(Edited)
The introduction of soy and soy products into their diet.
Dancing Turtles and Bouncing Boobs...that's Turtle Island.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
