See other War, War, War Articles
Title: Anti-War Mother Facing Credibility Issues
Source:
All Headline News
URL Source: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/cgi- ... wsbrief.plx?id=2247881640&fa=1
Published: Aug 13, 2005
Author: Douglas Maher
Post Date: 2005-08-13 14:09:52 by Willie Green
Keywords: Credibility, Anti-War, Mother
Views: 2787
Comments: 258
For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use. Crawford, Texas (AHN) - Pressure mounted against anti-war protester and mother of fallen Army Spc. Casey Sheehan Friday from millions of bloggers as well as cable news and talk radio outlets began to rip her intentions as well as her motivations to shreds. Ms. Sheehan is camping out on the road that leads to President Bush's Crawford, Texas ranch for the entire month of August where Bush makes an annual visit. The President continues his day-to-day business with daily briefings, trips to sign bills around the nation, and meets with organizations across the country while returning to the ranch by the afternoon. The President's motorcade has passed Ms. Sheehan numerous times without stopping to address her or her fellow anti-war protesters who claim they want to ask the president questions about "why he lied to them about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and an Al-Qaeda link to the country," which reportedly never existed. But as the week went on, numerous stories began to emerge about Ms. Sheehan and her ties to radical left-wing anti-war groups as well as inaccurate versions of her first meeting with President Bush at Fort Lewis in Washington. An unearthed article documented in the Vacaville Reporter News contradicted the current story Sheehan has been playing in front of dozens of reporters and media outlets across the world. Now Ms. Sheehan finds herself in an even deeper credibility issues as bloggers from various websites including Free Republic.com and military forums on the Internet discovered images during a google search of the first meeting of Bush and Sheehan where the President is giving Sheehan a consoling kiss on her cheek in a group family photo. Ms. Sheehan made no official comment about the discovery of the photo's on Friday but claims that she will move her protest to the sidewalks in front of the White House where the President is scheduled to return after Labor Day weekend.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-53) not displayed.
.
.
.
#54. To: Dakmar, robin, tom007 (#49)
Maybe Willie needs to read the declaration of Independence? Just the first few paragraphs would suffice. Zip, as I cleared it up with Dak, I wrote that as part of a post to Willie. His response was "Why not?" tom0007's answer to start in D.C. is a really good idea. We need to start at home with the entire DC cancer that Ike did his best to warn us about. Now that is evil.
ah okay. There is something MAJORLY wrong with this country in a very sick state. When people who say support our troops then turn around and yell 'we don't care'?? Is this radio slug a provacteur trying to stir this so it comes to a head? Sure seems so doesnt it?
Most interesting question, aristeides. A peek around their site and you learn that somehow Florida and Texas are involved. And finding that they are a news filtering organization----mercy, but that sort of reeks of Talon News, Gannon, et al., and the fellas down in Texas who'd sell their mother to a bordello so long as a republocrap would be made
They haven't a leg to stand on, it could not be more clear.
Agreed but I just wonder if there isnt more to this. They'd like nothing better than to incite these people IMO.
In today's political environment I'm surprised the neocons don't just invite her to a fancy govt shindig then make fun of her afterward for now knowing which fork to use for the smoked salmon.
We should thank the Nazis for giving us all those stark, frightening images. How else we gonna learn not to act like that? On the other hand, monkey see...
LOL! You know the truth of the matter is that the neocons have taken over the Democrat party too.. they just arent as visible YET.
I'm not so sure. What I can see them doing is trying to confuse, mixup and dilute her message, by having other activists with varying agenda vying for media time at her protest.
Oh I agree that is typical but it wouldnt surprise me in the least if stirring the pot to get a physical confrontation started. Think of the illegal issue and the films, watching those I couldnt help but notice the non Mexican people among the illegals stirring them up. I think there are those who are pushing this stuff to the limits to bring about violence.
I'm amazed at the discipline and control the MMP have shown. And they have been and continue to be provoked. The antiwar crowd may get a taste of this tactic, we'll see. If so, I hope they show as much restraint.
ok, dude, explain your homepage. ;)
It's his ATM pin number, so he won't forget it.
and the skull??
I missed the skull.
Wow! It took a scroll right to see that!
i know!
It was an image I found on google's image search. I forget what I was searching for now. But, as my main issue is finding the truth of human nature, I thought this was cool. Assuming this image isn't a fake (note the sinus passages and orbital socket) then WTF is a hominid (?) skull doing with fangs? The foremost front teeth look like they're for grinding. The fangs are most definitely for tearing. Animals have teeth designed for their diets. Horses have all flat teeth, cats have all sharp teeth. Humans have a combination as we eat everything, grains, vegetables & meat. So what else would have a combination? I just thought this was weird and cause for reflection, so it's my homepage.
This subliminal advertising is brought to you by The HonkeyMotherFucker Corporation for Internet Blogging ©2000-2010 all rights reserved worldwide
I guess it wouldn't be a hominid because of the placement of the teeth, space between the nose and top of the mouth and the small cranial dome. Not sure what this is, but it trips me out.
This subliminal advertising is brought to you by The HonkeyMotherFucker Corporation for Internet Blogging ©2000-2010 all rights reserved worldwide
hey, girl, good to see you. i read a little blip earlier that Idaho had voted down the patriot act? have you heard about that?
hmmmm..i don't know. what's your hypothesis?
Nah.......been trying to stay away from politics and idiots like the one that started this thread. See.......only two posts in ages and 50% of them are thinking very poorly of certain types of posters, i.e., those with their heads up their anal orifices. At this rate, I'll have to take a permanent leave of absence to overcome the negative feelings these brain-dead, hypocritical pathetic slices of humanity bring out.
Please robin, don't confuse Dak with such minor matters. Go Dak Go!!! LOL!!!
Fine, show me the part that forbids the commander-in-chief from taking military action.
My g_wd you're online posting tonight? Why aren't you knitting your fearless leader an Israeli flag or something..
i know the feeling. i got one just
like him, probably worse, emailing me. he thinks we need to "kill all the GD
ragheads." at least willie hasn't said that (yet).
lol
The tribal ragheads have been killing each other since the dawn of recorded history. If Dubya thinks he can help some of them establish a more civilized method of resolving their differences, I'm willing to skepticly go along with it.
You did read this article written by YOUR right Reverand Patrick J. Buchanan, did you Willie?? Go, Pat, Go!! ...isn't that what YOU say Dear Willie? March 24, 2003 issue Copyright © 2003 The American Conservative Whose War? A neoconservative clique seeks to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest. by Patrick J. Buchanan http://www.amconmag.com/03_2 4_03/cover.html Go, Pat, Go!! This article reads like something Cindy Sheehan would have written (or, at least, agree with 100%). Right Willie?? BTW and if given the chance, would you like to run over Cindy Sheehan with an IDF Catapiller bulldozer??
Dr. Condoleezza Rice said that the “security of Israel is the key to security of the world.”
Do you honestly think that's what we mobilized an army for? To play referee? In the history of warfare, armies have only been mobilized for a handful of reasons. Defense of country (N/A here), promotion of creed/religion/empire, acquisition of wealth/resources/land. There are no other reasons for war. There are only pretenses.
This subliminal advertising is brought to you by The HonkeyMotherFucker Corporation for Internet Blogging ©2000-2010 all rights reserved worldwide
You obviously don't know how the Constitution works. That explains a bit of your hate American / hate Americans / hate freedom position. The President, the Congress and the rest of the Federal Government have enumerated powers. If it's not in the Constitution, they are not supposed to be doing it. The way I read the Constitution, and the way most others read it is that the war powers only provide for the Common defense. Study the country you live in sometime. It's not as bad as you think it is. There is no need to for the hate you bear against this country or the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. In addition, have some respect for the country you live in. Not everyone here is a slimey loud mouthed coward sitting behind a keyboard - like you. Some have actually fought and died for the freedoms you hate - but still employ and enjoy. Some have the guts to go out and stand up for what they believe in. Even if it means taking cheap shots from gutless cowards like you. Now go go back to your beer and keyboard. Tell us what a big, bad warrior you are. Once more ask Christine what SHE knows about fighting and then tell us how you slithered out of Viet Nam on your cowardly belly. Tell us how you slithered out of Gulf War I on your cowardly belly. Then tell us why you won't sign up for the current war you so ardently support - you are eligible to go you know. Your bullshit last night about being too old is simply not true.
Perhaps killing another 100,000 more or so Iraqis should teach them the very valuable lesson of civilly resolving thier differences. Capital idea.
Dr. Condoleezza Rice said that the “security of Israel is the key to security of the world.”
Why is it any of our business to begin with? This isn't a defensive war. It has been definitively shown that Iraq posed no threat. Given that Iraq poses no threat, why are we there resolving differences for the Iraqis?
No. PJB has an accurate assessment of the neocon influence on the Administration's policies.
Well ... at least you're coming back to reality. Last night you were claiming that her son was killed by the evil foreigners who masquerade as Iraqi insurgents. I suppose the implication was that the loving Iraqis - who toss sweets and flowers - would never kill an American solder.
A neoconservative clique seeks to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest. PJB No neoconservative clique ensnaring our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest = no Iraqi "insurgents" = Sheehan's son still alive. Get it??
Dr. Condoleezza Rice said that the “security of Israel is the key to security of the world.”
"Neocon influence" and "Dubya" A distinction witout a difference. And, yes, they are both why the Sheehan boy is now dead.
Dr. Condoleezza Rice said that the “security of Israel is the key to security of the world.”
Perhaps killing another 100,000 more or so Iraqis should teach them the very valuable lesson of civilly resolving thier differences. How about that, Willie? Good idea?
Dr. Condoleezza Rice said that the “security of Israel is the key to security of the world.”
Comments (94 - 258) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest"We have no right to oust from power every leader we find evil." - Willie Green
#55. To: Zipporah (#54)
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#56. To: robin (#55)
#57. To: aristeides (#40)
king president.
#58. To: Zipporah (#56)
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#59. To: robin (#58)
They haven't a leg to stand on, it could not be more clear.
#60. To: Zipporah (#59)
#61. To: Dakmar (#60)
In today's political environment I'm surprised the neocons don't just invite her to a fancy govt shindig then make fun of her afterward for now knowing which fork to use for the smoked salmon.
#62. To: Zipporah (#59)
I just wonder if there isnt more to this. They'd like nothing better than to incite these people IMO.
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#63. To: robin (#62)
What I can see them doing is trying to confuse, mixup and dilute her message, by having other activists with varying agenda vying for media time at her protest.
#64. To: Zipporah (#63)
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#65. To: Dude Lebowski (#48)
#66. To: christine, Dude Lebowski (#65)
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#67. To: robin (#66)
#68. To: christine (#67)
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#69. To: christine, Dude Lebowski (#68)
One if by land, two if by sea...how many if they are already here?
#70. To: robin (#69)
#71. To: christine (#65)
ok, dude, explain your homepage. ;)
#72. To: Dude Lebowski (#71)
then WTF is a hominid (?) skull doing with fangs? The
#73. To: rowdee (#57)
#74. To: Dude Lebowski (#71)
then WTF is a hominid (?) skull doing with fangs?
#75. To: christine (#73)
#76. To: robin, Dakmar (#50)
I said that Dak. Willie asked why not.
He's on a rant, and it doesn't really matter to him who actually said what.
#77. To: avian virus (#53)
I asked you to show me the part that permits the President to wage war for purposes other than the common defense. You didn't do this. You didn't do it because you can't do it ....
#78. To: Willie Green (#76)
#79. To: Lady X, every pissed-off American here, (#78)
#80. To: rowdee (#75)
At this rate, I'll have to take a permanent leave of absence to
overcome the negative feelings these brain-dead, hypocritical pathetic slices
of humanity bring out.
#81. To: Lady X (#78)
#82. To: christine (#80)
he thinks we need to "kill all the GD ragheads." at least willie hasn't said that so far.
#83. To: christine, rowdee, all yall here (#81)
Toke down and chill with Kansas, from back in the day.
#84. To: Willie Green, avian virus, christine, Lady X, 1776, zipporah, rowdee, (#77)
#85. To: Willie Green (#82)
If Dubya thinks he can help some of them establish a more civilized method of resolving their differences
#86. To: Willie Green (#77)
Fine, show me the part that forbids the commander-in-chief from taking military action.
#87. To: Willie Green (#82)
If Dubya thinks he can help some of them establish a more civilized method of resolving their differences, I'm willing to skepticly go along with it.
#88. To: Willie Green (#82)
If Dubya thinks he can help some of them establish a more civilized method of resolving their differences, I'm willing to skepticly go along with it.
#89. To: wbales (#84)
This article reads like something Cindy Sheehan would have written (or, at least, agree with 100%).
Right Willie??
But the Bimbo goes over-the-top when she blames Dubya for the death of her son.
Her son was killed by the murderous Iraqi thugs called "insurgents".
#90. To: Willie Green (#89)
Her son was killed by the murderous Iraqi thugs called "insurgents".
#91. To: Willie Green (#89)
Her son was killed by the murderous Iraqi thugs called "insurgents".
#92. To: Willie Green (#89)
PJB has an accurate assessment of the neocon influence on the Administration's policies. But the Bimbo goes over-the-top when she blames Dubya for the death of her son. Her son was killed by the murderous Iraqi thugs called "insurgents".
#93. To: Willie Green (#89)
.
.
.