See other Resistance Articles
Title: We are Coming for You!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 18, 2009
Author: glenn beck,woman in arizona
Post Date: 2009-06-18 15:39:42 by freepatriot32
Ping List: *libertarians* Subscribe to *libertarians*
Keywords: glenn beck, we the people, Coming for You, libertarians
Views: 542
Comments: 13
following letter, read on Glenn Beck's show, is rapidly circulating around the country. Americans everywhere identify with this 53-year-old woman. She has given us a voice. Once you read this, you will want to forward it to all of your friends... GLENN BECK: I got a letter from a woman in Arizona. She writes an open letter to our nation's leadership: I'm a home grown American citizen, 53, registered Democrat all my life. Before the last presidential election I registered as a Republican because I no longer felt the Democratic Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. Now I no longer feel the Republican Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. The fact is I no longer feel any political party or representative in Washington represents my views or works to pursue the issues important to me. There must be someone. Please tell me who you are. Please stand up and tell me that you are there and that you're willing to fight for our Constitution as it was written. Please stand up now. You might ask yourself what my views and issues are that I would horribly feel so disenfranchised by both major political parties. What kind of nut job am I? Will you please tell me? Well, these are briefly my views and issues for which I seek representation: One, illegal immigration. I want you to stop coddling illegal immigrants and secure our borders. Close the underground tunnels. Stop the violence and the trafficking in drugs and people. No amnesty, not again. Been there, done that, no resolution. P.S., I'm not a racist. This isn't to be confused with legal immigration. Two, the TARP bill, I want it repealed and I want no further funding supplied to it. We told you no, but you did it anyway. I want the remaining unfunded 95% repealed. Freeze, repeal. Three: Czars, I want the circumvention of our checks and balances stopped immediately. Fire the czars. No more czars. Government officials answer to the process, not to the president. Stop trampling on our Constitution and honor it. Four, cap and trade. The debate on global warming is not over. There is more to say. Five, universal healthcare. I will not be rushed into another expensive decision. Don't you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night and then go on break. Slow down! Six, growing government control. I want states rights and sovereignty fully restored. I want less government in my life, not more. Shrink it down. Mind your own business. You have enough to take care of with your real obligations. Why don't you start there. Seven, ACORN. I do not want ACORN and its affiliates in charge of our 2010 census. I want them investigated. I also do not want mandatory escrow fees contributed to them every time on every real estate deal that closes. Stop the funding to ACORN and its affiliates pending impartial audits and investigations. I do not trust them with taking the census over with our taxpayer money. I don't trust them with our taxpayer money. Face up to the allegations against them and get it resolved before taxpayers get any more involved with them. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, hello. Stop protecting your political buddies. You work for us, the people. Investigate. Eight, redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine. I have always worked for people with more money than I have because they gave me jobs. That is the only redistribution of wealth that I will support. I never got a job from a poor person. Why do you want me to hate my employers? Why -- what do you have against shareholders making a profit? Nine, charitable contributions. Although I never got a job from a poor person, I have helped many in need. Charity belongs in our local communities, where we know our needs best and can use our local talent and our local resources. Butt out, please. We want to do it ourselves. Ten, corporate bailouts. Knock it off. Sink or swim like the rest of us. If there are hard times ahead, we'll be better off just getting into it and letting the strong survive. Quick and painful. Have you ever ripped off a Band-Aid? We will pull together. Great things happen in America under great hardship. Give us the chance to innovate. We cannot disappoint you more than you have disappointed us. Eleven, transparency and accountability. How about it? No, really, how about it? Let's have it. Let's say we give the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk. Please try -- please stop manipulating and trying to appease me with clever wording. I am not the idiot you obviously take me for. Stop sneaking around and meeting in back rooms making deals with your friends. It will only be a prelude to your criminal investigation. Stop hiding things from me. Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it now. Take a breath. Listen to the people. Let's just slow down and get some input from some nonpoliticians on the subject. Stop making everything an emergency. Stop speed reading our bills into law. I am not an activist. I am not a community organizer. Nor am I a terrorist, a militant or a violent person. I am a parent and a grandparent. I work. I'm busy. I'm busy. I am busy, and I am tired. I thought we elected competent people to take care of the business of government so that we could work, raise our families, pay our bills, have a little recreation, complain about taxes, endure our hardships, pursue our personal goals, cut our lawn, wash our cars on the weekends and be responsible contributing members of society and teach our children to be the same all while living in the home of the free and land of the brave. I entrusted you with upholding the Constitution. I believed in the checks and balances to keep from getting far off course. What happened? You are very far off course. Do you really think I find humor in the hiring of a speed reader to unintelligently ramble all through a bill that you signed into law without knowing what it contained? I do not. It is a mockery of the responsibility I have entrusted to you. It is a slap in the face. I am not laughing at your arrogance. Why is it that I feel as if you would not trust me to make a single decision about my own life and how I would live it but you should expect that I should trust you with the debt that you have laid on all of us and our children. We did not want the TARP bill. We said no. We would repeal it if we could. I am sure that we still cannot. There is such urgency and recklessness in all of the recent spending. From my perspective, it seems that all of you have gone insane. I also know that I am far from alone in these feelings. Do you honestly feel that your current pursuits have merit to patriotic Americans? We want it to stop. We want to put the brakes on everything that is being rushed by us and forced upon us. We want our voice back. You have forced us to put our lives on hold to straighten out the mess that you are making. We will have to give up our vacations, our time spent with our children, any relaxation time we may have had and money we cannot afford to spend on you to bring our concerns to Washington. Our president often knows all the right buzzword is unsustainable. Well, no kidding. How many tens of thousands of dollars did the focus group cost to come up with that word? We don't want your overpriced words. Stop treating us like we're morons. We want all of you to stop focusing on your reelection and do the job we want done, not the job you want done or the job your party wants done. You work for us and at this rate I guarantee you not for long because we are coming. We will be heard and we will be represented. You think we're so busy with our lives that we will never come for you? We are the formerly silent majority, all of us who quietly work , pay taxes, obey the law, vote, save money, keep our noses to the grindstone and we are now looking up at you. You have awakened us, the patriotic spirit so strong and so powerful that it had been sleeping too long. You have pushed us too far. Our numbers are great. They may surprise you. For every one of us who will be there, there will be hundreds more that could not come. Unlike you, we have their trust. We will represent them honestly, rest assured. They will be at the polls on voting day to usher you out of office. We have cancelled vacations. We will use our last few dollars saved. We will find the representation among us and a grassroots campaign will flourish. We didn't ask for this fight. But the gloves are coming off. We do not come in violence, but we are angry. You will represent us or you will be replaced with someone who will. There are candidates among us when he will rise like a Phoenix from the ashes that you have made of our constitution. Democrat, Republican, independent, libertarian. Understand this. We don't care. Political parties are meaningless to us. Patriotic Americans are willing to do right by us and our Constitution and that is all that matters to us now. We are going to fire all of you who abuse power and seek more. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it back. We entrusted you with it and you abused it. You are dishonorable. You are dishonest. As Americans we are ashamed of you. You have brought shame to us. If you are not representing the wants and needs of your constituency loudly and consistently, in spite of the objections of your party, you will be fired. Did you hear? We no longer care about your political parties. You need to be loyal to us, not to them. Because we will get you fired and they will not save you. If you do or can represent me, my issues, my views, please stand up. Make your identity known. You need to make some noise about it. Speak up. I need to know who you are. If you do not speak up, you will be herded out with the rest of the sheep and we will replace the whole damn congress if need be one by one. We are coming. Are we coming for you? Who do you represent? What do you represent? Listen. Because we are coming. We the people are coming.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All, *Shooters*, *Music Club*, *LEAP*, *Jack-Booted Thugs*, *Humor-Weird News*, *Agriculture-Environment* (#0)
spread this post to everyone on your email lists and any other forums you are on
Constitution Worship Undermines the Cause for Freedom by Manuel Lora Libertarians err when they use the Constitution to further their philosophy for freedom. While some say they want to "return to the Constitution" and see a proper role for a limited federal government on the basis of it being an ultimate guarantor of liberty, they nonetheless argue that some constitutional functions (like eminent domain and taxation), violate individual freedom. So which one is it? Is it possible to both support some government laws and not others? On what grounds? The Constitution is nothing more than a dead letter, a non-binding "social contract" and ultimately a historical artifact that tourists go to see when they visit Mordor, D.C. Indeed, as Keith Preston mentions (in the comments) "the Constitution is what it is: A landmark document in the evolution of political thought and the political charter of the classical American republic that has been de facto overthrown for generations. State's rights went out the window with the Civil War and Reconstruction and the rest of the Constiution [sic] was destroyed over the course of the 20th century. The few strands that remain, like due process and free speech, are now being eradicated as well." As a blog aficionado, I cringe whenever I read statements such as "we have freedom of speech because of the First Amendment" or "the Second Amendment protects my right to carry guns." Things like that are incredibly contrived. It is already bad enough that they are coming from so-called "libertarians" who, really, should know better. The Constitution, even if we were to accept the notion that it binds us, is just a chain on the feds. It does not give anyone freedom. The most common argument goes like this: "We would be better off if we returned to the Constitution." Fair enough. We would be, but that's not because the Constitution equals freedom. That statement is only true now because we are living in an era of unbridled sociofascism and thus we would enjoy more liberty if the Federal government were reduced. But that argument, however, cannot ever be used to advance the cause of liberty. It is at best a piece of historical data. Libertarianism aims to be universally valid; it must apply anywhere and any time. Thus, would today's libertarians favor the Constitutional Convention? Would they favor replacing the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution? Surely not, unless the Articles were to be replaced with a Giant Nothing. If the Constitution gave more power to the central government than it had under the Articles – and it did – then libertarians should have opposed it then (and some did) as they should today. Libertarians must refrain from positivism, empiricism and historicism. They shall succumb intellectually otherwise. The philosophy of non-aggression is not favored because it would promote any particular outcome. Aggression is simply not justified. Anyone who does not agree with that is either confused or a criminal, or both. It is not a vice to desire, say, the total elimination of murder, nor is it a virtue to favor moderation in murder. But to say that a particular government law should be followed because it gives us freedom, is erroneous and flawed. That a law can be used to enforce restrictions on government abuses is one thing. (Even then, the imposition of a law on those who do not consent to it is also an act of aggression; it is theft of land and the involuntary inclusion into a group.) But it's something totally different to claim that the law itself can bring about freedom. There is no duty to obey. And that, as Spooner reminds us, is not treason.
The U.S. Senate sneers at all Americans, the House is too busy with their drugs and orgies to notice anything happening outside of D.C., Obummer and The First Sheboon are occupied with nigger-parties 7 days a week in the White House and only come out to sober up briefly.
_________________________________________________________________________ A letter like this presumes that our "Elected" whores are 1. altrustic 2. care bout what we want 3. honest......none of which is true. One can write letters to government whores all day long and get nothing but a trip to an IRS audit or the No-fly list. No, the protestations of the people have been heard and ignored and it will continue. Oh they'll throw a psychological bone now and again and make you THINK they care and that things will change, but you know better, right?? The Supreme Kangaroo Court has already ruled. The robed gawds have already said "YOU HAVE NO STANDING"
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Beck will distance himself from anyone willing to "stand up" for the Constitution, unless they've read his books and agree that the government's tale about 9-11 is accurate. That said, the letter expresses a frustration many, many, many of us are feeling. Will there come a time to stand up? There's no question in my mind - when a government marginalizes people who believe in the words of the Founders and the documents they've left behind, it appears to me they're provoking the people who still believe America is unique.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
that is true. isn't the Declaration of Independence where the people's power lies? We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama
Not that it matters much but, in my opinion in order to fully understand the type of gov. and the intentions of the Founders at the time for this Country one must consider the wording and intent of all the founding documents including the writings of these great men. Once one has done so, in my opinion their intention was very clear.
"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that its people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson
Perhaps, although The Magna Carta of 1215 AD and other documents in particular The Confucian "Mandate of Heaven" of 1766 BC may be the first of their kind to be put into written word. The theory behind this was that the Chinese emperor acted as the "Son of Heaven" and held a mandate to rule over everyone else in the world; but only as long as he served the people well. If the quality of rule became questionable due to repeated natural disasters such as flood or famine, or for other reasons, then rebellion was justified. Both elude to the idea that the people's power is derived from "God" or "Heaven", and as such is a birth right or natural right.
ah, i had never heard of this. in my prior post, by people's power, i was referring specifically to the American people's power as it relates to the Constitution (which limits the governmnent we the people created--Declaration of Independence)
The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama
Ah the Constitution, sadly a complete and utter failure. It was meant to restrain the government, it has not. My sentiment is that natural law will once again reign as this 'limited government experiment' implodes and self destructs. The wise will attempt to stay out of the path of destruction and rebuild when the dust settles. Both the Mandate from Heaven and the Declaration of Independence give credence to the idea of just revolution which I do not refute, however my view is more akin to Spooner's "No Treason" which essentially states I never consented to the constitution and therefore it has no authority over me. I would say I am an an abolitionist like Spooner who would advocate abolition of the Federal Government and the Constitution too as a starting point toward human liberty and freedom. Peace.
The empiricism part comes in when a republic sedicated to liberty and freedom comes to understand that there are others who want to come in and take the people's marbles. British. Mexican. Europeans. Injuns even. We created tariffs and standing armies to protect the fruits of liberty that we had wrung out of the soil. It's a terrible conundrum. If you can help me with this, I'll buy you a twelve pack.
Join 2x4 Tuesdays & protect your RKBA. Standing armies are the hallmark of tyranical governments, the founders and others spoke eloquently on this. There is no provision in The Constitution for standing armies. This is one thing that was done correct in an otherwise flawed document. The Swiss have no standing army and have not been attacked or involved in a foregn invasion for over 500 years. Costa Rica has no army and has not been invaded or involved in a foreign conflict since 1948. Having a bunch of men who are trained in violence and death standing around with nothing productive to do is just asking for trouble and trouble we have created. Che Guerva wrote about fourth generation war and put to rest the idea that a foreign invader could be successful with a adversarial population, ie. Iraq, France during WWII, Afghanistan since the time of Genghis Khan. Not sure if this answers your inquiry, but am certainly willing to carry on the conversation.`
but the sheiks would shriek and the barons would bellow if hemp was made legal...and people became mellow
#2. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
#3. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?”
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#4. To: freepatriot32, JETHRO TULL, PSUSA (#0)
(Edited)
#5. To: Lysander_Spooner, freepatriot32, X-15, IndieTX, all (#2)
There must be someone. Please tell me who you are. Please stand up and tell me that you are there and that you're willing to fight for our Constitution as it was written. Please stand up now.
#6. To: Jethro Tull (#5)
(Edited)
Beck will distance himself from anyone willing to "stand up" for the Constitution, unless they've read his books and agree that the government's tale about 9-11 is accurate
#7. To: Lysander_Spooner (#2)
The Constitution, even if we were to accept the notion that it binds us, is just a chain on the feds. It does not give anyone freedom.
#8. To: christine (#7)
that is true. isn't the Declaration of Independence where the people's power lies?
#9. To: christine (#7)
isn't the Declaration of Independence where the people's power lies?
#10. To: Lysander_Spooner (#9)
"Mandate of Heaven" of 1766 BC may be the first of their kind to be put into written word. The theory behind this was that the Chinese emperor acted as the "Son of Heaven" and held a mandate to rule over everyone else in the world; but only as long as he served the people well. If the quality of rule became questionable due to repeated natural disasters such as flood or famine, or for other reasons, then rebellion was justified.
#11. To: christine (#10)
the American people's power as it relates to the Constitution (which limits the governmnent we the people created--Declaration of Independence)
#12. To: Lysander_Spooner (#11)
I would say I am an an abolitionist like Spooner who would advocate abolition of the Federal Government and the Constitution too as a starting point toward human liberty and freedom.
www.righttokeepandbeararms.com
#13. To: randge (#12)
(Edited)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest