Title: JFK - Shocking New Footage! Stabilized, filtered and in high definition: 05/12/2009 Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 24, 2009 Author:youtube Post Date:2009-06-24 18:28:52 by Clitora Keywords:None Views:2762 Comments:77
Actually, I think the "gun" you see is the reflection of the sun off of Agent Kellerman's hair. When the moment comes when the "gun" supposedly goes off, there's no muzzle flash and no recoil. Furthermore, the sheer force displayed when JFK's head literally explodes says to me that it was a rifle bullet that hit him, not a pistol bullet, unless said pistol was a .45, and if that was the case there would be a very prominent muzzle flash and one hell of a recoil.
I've looked at this footage countless times, and have never agreed with the premise that Agent Greer fired a shot at JFK. Now, do I think Oswald acted alone? Hell no. I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics. As compared to the utterly laughable "Magic Bullet" theory proposed by Senator Arlen Spector, which asks us all to believe that the laws of physics were suspended for a few momentous seconds in Dallas.
I am of the opinion that the "Greer shot JFK" theory is a classic example of a "honeypot" set out by those who seek to discredit those who question the official lie.
I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
I am of the opinion that the "Greer shot JFK" theory is a classic example of a "honeypot" set out by those who seek to discredit those who question the official lie.
You might be right there. I notice that the throat shot in this film is refered to as "Oswald's."
I'm with Collins Piper who thinks that there were two teams in town.
Someone shot at Kennedy with a rifle, we know now from acoustic evidence, witnesses and bullet marks on the windshield frame. That accounts for the throat wound that has Jackie distracted. Conally and his wife were similarly distracted by his injuries.
What makes this credible to me is that the driver turns AWAY from Kennedy as he is hit in the skull. I could well imagine that he might turn toward him at such a moment. Actually, the driver has no business looking in that direction at all. He has a partner as an observer. His job, when bullets are flying is to keep his eyes on the road and get to safety.
I think part of their premise is that Jackie attempts to exit the vehicle from the rear. If someone is shooting at you go would intictively go away from the direction from which the gun is fired. Who would go toward the gun?
I don't buy their theory myself but that part of their argument does work.
, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics.
Yes. Anything else is pathetic nonsense by folks who don't shoot and are ignorant of physics.
Actually, I think the "gun" you see is the reflection of the sun off of Agent Kellerman's hair. Part of the drivers "arm" appears to be the curb.
Agreed. It looks more like the hair/head of the man in the front passenger seat than anything else.
When the moment comes when the "gun" supposedly goes off, there's no muzzle flash and no recoil.
No flash, but there is the appearance of a recoil, which looks more like the front passenger's reaction to the fatal shot.
I am of the opinion that the "Greer shot JFK" theory is a classic example of a "honeypot" set out by those who seek to discredit those who question the official lie.
I agree there is, unfortunately, no shortage of false theories that do nothing but dilute trust and credibility in the real & credible ones. We really need to be objective and discriminating rather than believing every anti-gov, the-Fed-did-it type claim that is made.
Obviously JFK was shot, and certain powers had motive. That much we can believe. But I think this video is perpetuating an illusion.