Title: JFK - Shocking New Footage! Stabilized, filtered and in high definition: 05/12/2009 Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 24, 2009 Author:youtube Post Date:2009-06-24 18:28:52 by Clitora Keywords:None Views:2700 Comments:77
Actually, I think the "gun" you see is the reflection of the sun off of Agent Kellerman's hair. When the moment comes when the "gun" supposedly goes off, there's no muzzle flash and no recoil. Furthermore, the sheer force displayed when JFK's head literally explodes says to me that it was a rifle bullet that hit him, not a pistol bullet, unless said pistol was a .45, and if that was the case there would be a very prominent muzzle flash and one hell of a recoil.
I've looked at this footage countless times, and have never agreed with the premise that Agent Greer fired a shot at JFK. Now, do I think Oswald acted alone? Hell no. I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics. As compared to the utterly laughable "Magic Bullet" theory proposed by Senator Arlen Spector, which asks us all to believe that the laws of physics were suspended for a few momentous seconds in Dallas.
I am of the opinion that the "Greer shot JFK" theory is a classic example of a "honeypot" set out by those who seek to discredit those who question the official lie.
I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
I've never thought that the pattern of blood, bone and tissue that you see as the parietal portion of the skull comes away is consistent with a shot from behind.
That's how the Dan Rather reenactments want us to view it. (And that's another reason in itself to doubt the head shot from behind.)
In addition, it's not only his skull that goes forward, but his upper torso. The fatal shot came from the front.
I've already seen such experiments done with melons. I wish I had it to post. Shoot a melon and it will jump towards the shot, not back. Try it yourself. Watch the footage again. It is the blow out in the front that kicks his head back.
I've already seen such experiments done with melons. I wish I had it to post. Shoot a melon and it will jump towards the shot, not back. Try it yourself. Watch the footage again. It is the blow out in the front that kicks his head back.
Say what you will. Does not matter to me. Army experiments show what I said it showed. Shoot a melon, closest thing to a human head, and it will jump towards the shot. Always.
Shoot a melon, closest thing to a human head, and it will jump towards the shot. Always.
The govt used cadavers for their most comprehensive ballistics testing unless they were testing ammo for use against enemy melons or trying to keep the phony Warren Commission Report alive.
The govt used cadavers for their most comprehensive ballistics testing unless they were testing ammo for use against enemy melons or trying to keep the phony Warren Commission Report alive.
Whatever, this is not a hill I want to die on. I'm just reporting what I saw. You guys chose not to believe me, oh well.
Whatever, this is not a hill I want to die on. I'm just reporting what I saw. You guys chose not to believe me, oh well.
No, I believe you.
It's just that the govt has plenty of evidence that directly contradicts that melon demo, and there's only two reasons to even show such a thing:
A) To see what a bullet does to a melon
and
B) To confuse people about the truth of the assassination of JFK.
The fact that you saw fit to mention it as if it proved anything regarding the assassination means the govt was correct to cloud the issue with that footage. There are only a handful of real ballistics experts who's find any interest in the subject and none of them are likely to finger the govt as the lying murdering bastards they are for obvious reasons. Those involved in internal, external and terminal ballistics research are by definition involved with all levels of govt, and for the same reason scientists weren't too anxious to point out the big lies about the controlled demolitions on 9/11. The president of the National Fire Fighters Magazine called BS on the whole story and he lost his job so fast it was scary, and that message traveled real fast.
Of course lots of FDNY firefighters have spoken about explosions and other things that don't fit, but who in the federal mafia is paying any attention? If any decide to pursue it and press for a real investigation to the media or on speaking tours then they'll get a response, alright.