Title: JFK - Shocking New Footage! Stabilized, filtered and in high definition: 05/12/2009 Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 24, 2009 Author:youtube Post Date:2009-06-24 18:28:52 by Clitora Keywords:None Views:2665 Comments:77
Actually, I think the "gun" you see is the reflection of the sun off of Agent Kellerman's hair. When the moment comes when the "gun" supposedly goes off, there's no muzzle flash and no recoil. Furthermore, the sheer force displayed when JFK's head literally explodes says to me that it was a rifle bullet that hit him, not a pistol bullet, unless said pistol was a .45, and if that was the case there would be a very prominent muzzle flash and one hell of a recoil.
I've looked at this footage countless times, and have never agreed with the premise that Agent Greer fired a shot at JFK. Now, do I think Oswald acted alone? Hell no. I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics. As compared to the utterly laughable "Magic Bullet" theory proposed by Senator Arlen Spector, which asks us all to believe that the laws of physics were suspended for a few momentous seconds in Dallas.
I am of the opinion that the "Greer shot JFK" theory is a classic example of a "honeypot" set out by those who seek to discredit those who question the official lie.
I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
I've never thought that the pattern of blood, bone and tissue that you see as the parietal portion of the skull comes away is consistent with a shot from behind.
That's how the Dan Rather reenactments want us to view it. (And that's another reason in itself to doubt the head shot from behind.)
In addition, it's not only his skull that goes forward, but his upper torso. The fatal shot came from the front.
I've already seen such experiments done with melons. I wish I had it to post. Shoot a melon and it will jump towards the shot, not back. Try it yourself. Watch the footage again. It is the blow out in the front that kicks his head back.
I've already seen such experiments done with melons. I wish I had it to post. Shoot a melon and it will jump towards the shot, not back. Try it yourself. Watch the footage again. It is the blow out in the front that kicks his head back.
Say what you will. Does not matter to me. Army experiments show what I said it showed. Shoot a melon, closest thing to a human head, and it will jump towards the shot. Always.
Shoot a melon, closest thing to a human head, and it will jump towards the shot. Always.
The govt used cadavers for their most comprehensive ballistics testing unless they were testing ammo for use against enemy melons or trying to keep the phony Warren Commission Report alive.
Probably the best book about the shooters is Craig Roberts' "Killzone: A Sniper Looks at Dealy Plaza".
Roberts was a professional sniper and trained snipers for 20 years. His analysis is pretty conclusive - there was at least a 3 way crossfire. The shots came from the front.
Probably the best book about the shooters is Craig Roberts' "Killzone: A Sniper Looks at Dealy Plaza".
Roberts was a professional sniper and trained snipers for 20 years. His analysis is pretty conclusive - there was at least a 3 way crossfire. The shots came from the front.
Roger that.
And I already told you what Gunny Hathcock told me on the phone.
He was the sniper that the FBI asked to set up the simulation and to fire Oswald's crab trap anchor of a rifle, and Hathcock said "It couldn't be done."
Years ago after reading MARINE SNIPER-93 CONFIRMED KILLS I located Gunny Hathcock (93 Raff RD, Va Beach, VA) and I began calling him to ask questions about the finer points of rifle shooting. I lived in CA and I breathed, ate and slept for ways to tighten my lovingly hand loaded groups (.243 and .308) and The Gunny was all too happy to talk rifles with me.
After a few months (and I was sure he knew who I was and what I was about) I asked "the question":
"Gunny, did Oswald fire three shots in 6 seconds at the Kennedy motorcade?"
"The FBI asked me the same question!" he replied.
Gunny was the Wimbledon 1,000 yd champion in 1968 (shooting for the marines) the same year the FBI asked him to duplicate the alleged assassination scenario. And, the detail that some folks refuse to deal with is this:
Oswald's rifle had a poorly mounted scope that was too low for the action (OTR or production scope bases come in at least three different heights) and it was impossible to cycle the bolt in one smooth practiced throw because of the excessive wear and play in the bolt and the fact that the fingers had to be moved to clear the scope in both directions of travel.
In other words, he had to firmly grasp the bolt in order to open it on a fired and swollen brass, then reposition his fingers to clear the scope in both directions thus making it impossible to even cycle the action in the time allowed, never mind shooting it or, shooting for any attempt at accuracy!
This little detail is tantamount to proving that someone didn't outrun the police in a car with only one front wheel, (and execute one of the most important if not highest paying contracts in the history of assassinations) and yet those "true believers" in the Warren Report refuse to accept the fact that it was physically impossible for Oswald to be the lone sniper at Dealey Plaza on that terrible day.
And they never seem to be the slightest bit curious about why the entire establishment lined up to file off so many rough edges of the lone assassin story. TIME MAGAZINE stopped their presses and pulled some photos from the Zapruder sequence, The Commission moved the bullet wound in JFK's back 6 inches to coincide with the "magic bullet" fairie tale, and the WC never even bothered to hear the truly important testimony of witnesses, i.e. doctors describing wounds, people in the Plaza who fingered the grassy knoll, the different type of ammo in Oswald's .38 S&W caliber (.38 short-not .38 spl) revolver and in his possession at home versus the type used to kill Dallas PD Officer J.D. Tippett, etc.,.
There are just too many anomalies even if one were to swallow the "Majick Bullet" Theory of Arlen, the opportunist apparatchik, Spectre.
For one one of the Dallas PD Detectives first on the scene of Oswald's alleged "Sniper's Nest" identified the recovered Rifle as a Mauser - and he was both a veteran and a veteran of the European Theatre - so he knew a Mauser from a Carcano. There may have been a sniper in the Book Depository but it wasn't Oswald, and my guess is that the Carcano was later substituted in order to complete the "frame" on Oswald.
As well when the Dallas PD came running into the book depository within a couple of minutes Oswald was in the second floor lounge drinking a Coke, was not winded, and not sweating. Pretty neat trick in Dallas to go from the 9th floor to the 2nd Floor in under 3 minutes, get a Coke and be nonchalantly lounging when the cops come bursting in.
Many other anomalies as well as I know you are aware.
Tying in with the throat and head wounds was David Lifton's research into how the autopsy was likely cooked to support the "lone nut" conspiracy theory.