Title: JFK - Shocking New Footage! Stabilized, filtered and in high definition: 05/12/2009 Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 24, 2009 Author:youtube Post Date:2009-06-24 18:28:52 by Clitora Keywords:None Views:2630 Comments:77
Actually, I think the "gun" you see is the reflection of the sun off of Agent Kellerman's hair. When the moment comes when the "gun" supposedly goes off, there's no muzzle flash and no recoil. Furthermore, the sheer force displayed when JFK's head literally explodes says to me that it was a rifle bullet that hit him, not a pistol bullet, unless said pistol was a .45, and if that was the case there would be a very prominent muzzle flash and one hell of a recoil.
I've looked at this footage countless times, and have never agreed with the premise that Agent Greer fired a shot at JFK. Now, do I think Oswald acted alone? Hell no. I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics. As compared to the utterly laughable "Magic Bullet" theory proposed by Senator Arlen Spector, which asks us all to believe that the laws of physics were suspended for a few momentous seconds in Dallas.
I am of the opinion that the "Greer shot JFK" theory is a classic example of a "honeypot" set out by those who seek to discredit those who question the official lie.
I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
I've never thought that the pattern of blood, bone and tissue that you see as the parietal portion of the skull comes away is consistent with a shot from behind.
That's how the Dan Rather reenactments want us to view it. (And that's another reason in itself to doubt the head shot from behind.)
In addition, it's not only his skull that goes forward, but his upper torso. The fatal shot came from the front.
A critique of the jet effect theory as an explanation for the rearward head movement of John Kennedy when allegedly shot from the right rear
The simple claim of an equal and opposite reaction to the blown out brain matter being similar to the thrust developed in a rocket or jet engine, in response to its exhaust, is deceiving if one does not understand the mechanics involved. How thrust is developed in a rocket or jet engine and the role the exhaust plays is shown and explained in the figure and paragraphs below.
See article for a debunking of the "jet effect" and precisely why the experiment was flawed.
if the shot came from behind, how do you explain jackie climbing out over the trunk. she would have ducked down into the limo...unless she saw the driver shoot kennedy or realized the shots had come from the front.