Title: JFK - Shocking New Footage! Stabilized, filtered and in high definition: 05/12/2009 Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 24, 2009 Author:youtube Post Date:2009-06-24 18:28:52 by Clitora Keywords:None Views:2651 Comments:77
Actually, I think the "gun" you see is the reflection of the sun off of Agent Kellerman's hair. When the moment comes when the "gun" supposedly goes off, there's no muzzle flash and no recoil. Furthermore, the sheer force displayed when JFK's head literally explodes says to me that it was a rifle bullet that hit him, not a pistol bullet, unless said pistol was a .45, and if that was the case there would be a very prominent muzzle flash and one hell of a recoil.
I've looked at this footage countless times, and have never agreed with the premise that Agent Greer fired a shot at JFK. Now, do I think Oswald acted alone? Hell no. I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics. As compared to the utterly laughable "Magic Bullet" theory proposed by Senator Arlen Spector, which asks us all to believe that the laws of physics were suspended for a few momentous seconds in Dallas.
I am of the opinion that the "Greer shot JFK" theory is a classic example of a "honeypot" set out by those who seek to discredit those who question the official lie.
I have looked, repeatedly. Once again, if that was, in fact, a gun used to shook JFK at that range, then why don't we see either muzzle flash and/or recoil? That would be a BIG gun firing a BIG (I'd guess .45 ACP) round to create that kind of damage, where JFK's head literally explodes. So why no muzzle flash or recoil? Have you ever fired a .45 ACP? Those things pack a kick!
I have looked, repeatedly. Once again, if that was, in fact, a gun used to shook JFK at that range, then why don't we see either muzzle flash and/or recoil? That would be a BIG gun firing a BIG (I'd guess .45 ACP) round to create that kind of damage, where JFK's head literally explodes. So why no muzzle flash or recoil? Have you ever fired a .45 ACP? Those things pack a kick!
The original "driver dun it" story was presented with the video and the assertion that he killed the president with a compressed air gun shooting a projectile filled with deadly fish toxin.
But that story seems to be falling out of favor so the fish toxin gun is left off now.
And if the driver killed JFK (it would logically follow that) he (or others) would have been obligated to kill the governor and the first lady.
Connelly always said he did not want to talk about it. It is easy to silence someone forever with the knowledge they can be taken out.
"Easy" you say?
Then why did 22 other material witnesses (not including Oswald or Ruby) die under highly suspicious circumstances?
According to your "expert theory" that shouldn't have been necessary at all and it should have been "easy" to silence them with a mere warning of the consequences if they spoke of what they saw.
According to your "expert theory" that shouldn't have been necessary at all and it should have been "easy" to silence them with a mere warning of the consequences if they spoke of what they saw.
Logic isn't your strength I see.
-Yawn-
It is far easier to keep someone who is in politics silent. Happens every day with black mail and what have you.
Far harder to black mail a bunch of pedesterians, so I bet they just killed them.
That seems logical to me, and I remember hearing a tape recording of connely talking about how he didn't want to talk about the assination.
Perhaps you need to double check on what logic is?