Title: JFK - Shocking New Footage! Stabilized, filtered and in high definition: 05/12/2009 Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 24, 2009 Author:youtube Post Date:2009-06-24 18:28:52 by Clitora Keywords:None Views:2615 Comments:77
Actually, I think the "gun" you see is the reflection of the sun off of Agent Kellerman's hair. When the moment comes when the "gun" supposedly goes off, there's no muzzle flash and no recoil. Furthermore, the sheer force displayed when JFK's head literally explodes says to me that it was a rifle bullet that hit him, not a pistol bullet, unless said pistol was a .45, and if that was the case there would be a very prominent muzzle flash and one hell of a recoil.
I've looked at this footage countless times, and have never agreed with the premise that Agent Greer fired a shot at JFK. Now, do I think Oswald acted alone? Hell no. I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics. As compared to the utterly laughable "Magic Bullet" theory proposed by Senator Arlen Spector, which asks us all to believe that the laws of physics were suspended for a few momentous seconds in Dallas.
I am of the opinion that the "Greer shot JFK" theory is a classic example of a "honeypot" set out by those who seek to discredit those who question the official lie.
I think JFK was caught in a crossfire, and the fatal shot came from in front of the limo, to the right. Why do I think that? Because his head snaps BACK and to the LEFT. That's why. It's basic physics.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
No, what you see is the blow out, exit not entrance. As for the head going back, oddly enough that is consistent with a shot from behind.
I've never thought that the pattern of blood, bone and tissue that you see as the parietal portion of the skull comes away is consistent with a shot from behind.
That's how the Dan Rather reenactments want us to view it. (And that's another reason in itself to doubt the head shot from behind.)
In addition, it's not only his skull that goes forward, but his upper torso. The fatal shot came from the front.
In addition, it's not only his skull that goes forward, but his upper torso. The fatal shot came from the front
That's what I come away with after watching this countless times. The rest of the theories, although thought provoking, can be wrapped up tightly with industrial strength tin foil.