[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: UNH Scientist Helps Show Collapse of Antarctic Ice Shelf is “Unprecedented” ENVIRONMENTAL ALERT** UNH Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space UNH Scientist Helps Show Collapse of Antarctic Ice Shelf is Unprecedented Contact: David Sims mailto:david.sims@unh.edu 603-862-5369 Science Writer Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space Aug. 3, 2005 DURHAM, N.H. -- A paper to be published in the August 4 issue of the journal Nature asserts that the recent collapse of the Larsen B Ice Shelf in the Weddell Sea of Antarctica is unprecedented in recent times. The ice shelf the third largest in the Antarctic has undergone catastrophic decay in recent years. A total of about 3, 250 square kilometers of the shelf area disintegrated in a five-day period in the winter of 2002. Over the last five years the ice mass has lost some 5,700 square kilometers and is currently 40 percent the size it was previously when stable. Using marine sediment cores from the ocean floor formerly covered by the ice shelf, scientists found no evidence for episodes of open marine conditions indicating that the ice shelf has been in existence for last 8,000 years a period of time referred to as the Holocene Epoch. Our unique observation, that for the first time the Larsen B is involved in collapse, indicates that the current warming trend in the NW Weddell Sea has exceeded past warm episodes in its magnitude, states the paper, whose lead author is Eugene Domack of Hamilton College. University of New Hampshire scientist Michael Prentice, one of the articles authors, is an expert in the paleoceanographic technique used to extract past ocean properties from the seafloor sediment. The technique involves analyzing the chemical composition of the remains of tiny, one-celled animals called Foraminifera or forams. The technique, according to Prentice, is technically challenging in polar regions but highly accurate at giving a clear picture of past water temperatures and salinity levels. Says Prentice, Some of the forams in the cores lived and died in the surface water adjacent to the ice shelf before settling to the seafloor to be incorporated into the sediment that we recovered. A pristine record of ocean surface water can be had from analyzing them. Prentice calls forams the workhorse in the field of paleoclimatology. The method involves dissolving the carbonate shells of the tiny forams and, using a mass spectrometer, measuring the oxygen isotopes contained within the carbon dioxide gas that comes from the shells. Because the ratio of oxygen isotopes in the shells is controlled by the water conditions at the time the forams were living, forams from layers of accumulating sediment give a clear record of water conditions from the present back deep into the past. We got a pretty good fix on what the longer history of ice shelf extent and melting has been, Prentice says. This fix, in turn, gives scientists a context for judging the significance of the current collapse. Prentice adds, These data are the first good isotopic record adjacent to a crumbling ice shelf. And that isotope record, he says, suggests that there has been a progressive slow melting/thinning of the ice shelf over the last 8,000 years. This is due in part to climate warming. But melting over the last 8,000 years was never close to what it is today, and so the current collapse and glacier surge that it has unleashed are unprecedented. He adds, The Larsen B is considered a harbinger for the massive ice shelves to its south, which, for now, dam the large majority of the worlds ice. UNH credentials: related links: http://www.eos.sr.unh.edu/ The Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS) at the University of New Hampshire (UNH) is a multidisciplinary scientific research institute dedicated to understanding the integrated behavior of the Earth and its surrounding universe. Established in 1985, the Institute has become a world leader in the fields of space science, terrestrial ecosystems, oceanography, atmospheric science and global climate change. About the Institute . . . UNH is a "high-impact university" (in the company of Stanford, Harvard, and Princeton). The Institute for Scientific Information ranks UNH third in geoscience research citations and fourth in environmental science citations. EOS is the University of New Hampshire's largest research enterprise, receiving more than $30 million each year in external research support. UNH is a world leader in Gamma-Ray telescopes. EOS was the American center for development of the Compton Telescope (COMPTEL) on the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, one of NASA's "great observatories." UNH Receives $38 Million From NASA for Sun-Earth Mission http://www.eos.sr.unh.edu/About/News/Articles?NEWS_ID=454 DURHAM, N.H. The University of New Hampshire has received the largest, single research award in the history of the institution $38 million from NASA to build instruments for the space agencys Magnetospheric MultiScale (MMS) mission. As part of an international team from 12 institutes, space scientists at UNHs Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS) will construct instruments for MMS four identical solar-terrestrial probes, which will study little understood, fundamental processes in the Earths magnetosphere -- the magnetic shield that protects the Earth from solar and cosmic radiation. Over the next eight years, UNH scientists, engineers, graduate and undergraduate students will help construct two Electron Drift Instruments, (EDI) for each of the four spacecraft. EDI is designed to measure electric fields and electron drifts using a controlled beam of electrons. In addition, UNH will construct the central electronic controls for all the instruments being built to measure the spectrum of electromagnetic fields around the spacecraft. This FIELDS instrument suite will be comprised of six sensors per spacecraft. The expertise of the UNH Space Science Center in space instrumentation was critical to forming our excellent international FIELDS team on MMS, which will contribute many of the new observations for this exciting mission, says physics professor Roy Torbert, director of the EOS Space Science Center and UNHs principal investigator for the mission. James L. Burch of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, is leading construction of the missions $140 million instrument suite. The MMS spacecraft are slated to launch aboard an 86-foot, 225,000-pound Delta II rocket in July 2013. The mission is designed to explore the plasma processes that govern the interaction of the Earths magnetic field with the highly charged solar wind. Plasma is a highly ionized gas sometimes described as the fourth state of matter. Plasmas occupy 99 percent of the observable universe. However, only in the Earths magnetosphere a multilayered, comet-shaped magnetic shield that, in its tail, extends as far as 60,000 kilometers away are these important plasma processes readily accessible for sustained study through in situ measurements. One of those processes is magnetic reconnection, in which magnetic fields reconfigure themselves and release energy. Reconnection, a main focus of the MMS mission, is the basic mechanism by which energy from the sun and the solar wind is transferred into the Earths magnetospheric system. Reconnection is widely believed to play a crucial role in space and astrophysical phenomena such as magnetospheric substorms and solar flares. It is a crucial process to understand in order to be able to predict space weather conditions. For example, a blast of this energy from substorms or solar flares can affect satellites, Earth-based instruments and power grids, shower astronauts and aircraft flying over the Earths poles with deadly radiation, and light up the sky with aurora. In a sense, MMS represents a culmination of the extensive work done in space science at the university, Torbert says. It is based on previous successful NASA and European Space Agency missions in which UNH has participated, such as the CLUSTER, SOHO, ACE, WIND, and POLAR satellites, as well as our theoretical and numerical simulation work, where the process of reconnection has been observed and simulated, but never studied as rigorously as will be done on MMS. Other plasma processes that MMS will study include charged particle acceleration, and turbulence in key boundary regions of the Earths magnetosphere. Along with magnetic reconnection, these processes control the flow of energy, mass, and momentum within and across plasma boundaries, occur throughout the universe, and are fundamental to our understanding of astrophysical and solar system plasmas. Despite four decades of study, beginning with the early Sputnik and Explorer spacecraft, much about the operation of these processes remains unknown or poorly understood. MMS and its multiple spacecraft approach will provide a much more detailed picture of the region. Each of the four satellites, flying together as a tightly coordinated fleet through the magnetosphere, will carry identical instruments and will thus be able to gather a multi-dimensional view of these processes that have eluded previous studies. Along with UNH, co-investigators include the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, the Applied Physics Laboratory at Johns Hopkins University, the Austrian Academy of Sciences, the French Center for Terrestrial and Planetary Environments, the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology, the Technical University of Braunschweig, the University of California at Los Angeles, the University of Colorado at Boulder, and the University of Iowa. Scientists Gather at UNH to Discuss Initial Findings From Massive 2004 Air Quality Study DURHAM, N.H. -- Last year at this time, seacoast New Hampshire was the hub of an unprecedented atmospheric science field campaign involving hundreds of scientists from around the world. Beginning Tuesday, August 9 at the University of New Hampshire, preliminary data from the International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation (ICARTT) will be shared for the first time since the six-week-long field experiment drew to a close in mid-August 2004. This was a really complex experiment, with so many people and so much logistical integration that it took a year for people to pull their data together, says UNH atmospheric chemist Robert Talbot, director of AIRMAP a joint National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/UNH program aimed at understanding climate variability and the source of persistent air pollutants in New England. AIRMAPs four regional state-of-the-art atmospheric observatories served as the foundation for the field experiment. U.S. Senator Judd Gregg helped secure funding for the AIRMAP program and facilitated NOAA's role in ICARTT. Adds Talbot, This campaign was the first time weve been able to make a concerted effort, using airplanes, a ship, satellites, and balloons, to better understand regional air quality, intercontinental transport of polluted air masses, the role that nighttime chemistry plays, and the effects of pollutants on atmospheric cooling and warming. So, there should be some important information coming out of this meeting. For example, there will be insights into the possible role that sea-borne compounds called halogens, like chlorine or iodine, play in creating or destroying ground-based ozone levels. When polluted continental air meets up with halogen-rich coastal marine air, the chemistry gets complicated and is not well understood. A better understanding is important if scientists are to calculate the global ozone budget much like they are trying to ascertain the worlds carbon budget vis-à-vis climate change and global warming. Tropospheric ozone (as opposed to the stratospheric variety that helps protect the Earth from ultraviolet radiation) is generally considered to be a pollutant and can cause respiratory problems and damage plants. At the same time, this ozone plays a dual role in helping to cleanse the Earths atmosphere, and so keeping a healthy balance of the compound is important in the overall, global state of our atmosphere. At the workshop, ICARTT scientists will also for the first time be able to compare notes on what was discovered about the effect aerosols or particulate matter have on the cooling or warming of air masses. The radiative properties of these particles play a critical role in regional and hemispheric temperatures. Additional insights, based on what was observed last summer, will be provided into how well current forecast models are able to simulate the chemistry and transport of pollutants. Talbot notes also that, like the universitys prominent role in ICARTT itself, UNHs hosting of this meeting is a feather in its cap because scientific gatherings of this size and importance are generally reserved for special sessions of the American Geophysical Union meetings or the like. This will be the first meeting of some of the finest minds in atmospheric chemistry well before next falls AGU meeting in San Francisco. And, says Talbot, Until you hear what everybodys found its really hard to develop any answers, until you can see how the whole thing fits together its hard to pull out the real simplified gems. Editors: The ICARTT meeting will be held in the Granite State Room of the Memorial Union Building on the Durham campus beginning Tuesday, August 9, and running through Friday morning on August 12. Scientists will be available for reporters questions Wednesday and Thursday. There will be nearly 100 posters graphically displaying the ICARTT data. By David Sims Science Writer Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (603) 862-5369 david.sims@unh.edu Sia's comments: UNH's science department is not a "lightweight" source. We'd do well to HEED the alerts our nation's scientists are sending us about what we are doing to the environment with our pollution. Our air quality, our water safety, and our very LIVES can depend on it. If the Artic shelf melts down, we are SCREWED whether we realize it or not. The flood of fresh water into the salty oceans will kill billions of sea creatures essential to Earth's ecology... nevermind flooding our land masses, warming the globe even MORE, and most likely, triggering an ice age. All these things are NORMAL occurences to happen to the earth and all have happened before but NOT due to human pollution and not over a period of 150 years of "triggers" due to POLLUTION. We won't LIKE Mother nature if we don't start listening. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41.
#1. To: siagiah (#0)
People are concerned about rising gasoline prices ,but we should be looking for alternative fuels instead of more sources of OIL which is exacerbating the global warming problem "A top NASA climate expert who twice briefed Dick Cheney on global warming planned to criticize the administration's approach to the issue in a lecture at the University of Iowa on Tuesday night and say that a senior administration official told him last year not to discuss dangerous consequences of rising temperatures. .The expert, James Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in Manhattan, [says] the Bush administration has ignored growing evidence that sea levels could rise significantly unless prompt action is taken to reduce heat-trapping emissions from smokestacks and tailpipes." Hansen says Bush's climate proposals "puts off consideration of binding cuts in such emissions until 2012, was likely to be too little too late."
You know, I've heard the tales of doomsters my whole freakin' life. "There's going to be another ice age", "There's going to be a runaway greenhouse and we'll die of the heat!", "Chernobyl is going to poison the Earth and we'll all die of cancer", "We're going to run out of all fossil fuels by 1985", "AIDS is going to kill every sexually active person on the planet", woe, woe, woe, doom, doom, doom, we're all gonna die.... At this point these professors can take their research and jam it sideways where the sun doesn't shine. If they are saying the ice caps are melting that probably means they're thicker than ever. They're a bunch of liars and scammers and I'll never listen to their garbage again for as long as I live. I'd rather drown under a ocean risen five hundred feet than kick myself yet again for being fooled yet one more time by these lying scumbags.
The thing to note is that they always follow up with their political agenda of legislation that they'd like to pass that would force other people to live they way they think we all ought to, according to their personal value system. It's all about regulation, control and the subjugation of liberty. Always.
They're a bunch of liars and scammers and I'll never listen to their garbage again for as long as I live. Nuke Buzzcut aka KJ?...The thing to note is that they always follow up with their political agenda of legislation that they'd like to pass that would force other people to live they way they think we all ought to, according to their personal value system. It's all about regulation, control and the subjugation of liberty. Always. Actually, I don't believe anyone mentioned ANYTHING about regulation, control, or the subjugation of liberty... In fact, I do believe that all anyone mentioned was that A PROBLEM EXISTS... You two clowns are free to jam your heads in the sand (or drown if you insist) but the REST of us consider the environment to be a tad important and intend to LISTEN TO THE EARTH'S COMPLAINTS before it is too late... I know, I know... You're scared to admit that our planet isn't invincible. Plus you STILL think Bush is all that and that we're winning in Iraq too... Also, Coal & Oil are LIMITLESS if only we could just drill more in the Artic... but someday, I'm sure that you'll be strong enough to face reality... if you don't drown first... (laughing out loud at myself for wasting my time responding to either of you)
Don't laugh too hard.. I'm wondering why I wasted time reading your reply. At least Mister Virus put on a case, while you just sound like jazzfan.
whatevah... I presented the article in the first place and already SAID my piece there... The two I addressed my remarks to didn't "make their case"... they made ridiculous remarks about preferring to DROWN than to listen to another word about global warming... TYPICAL RUSHIES... but then, you knew that... (ooops, did we both just waste more time? tee hee... LIGHTEN UP jhoffa... )
There are no replies to Comment # 41. End Trace Mode for Comment # 41.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|