[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Hal Turner Arrested for threatening Judges...Faces up to 10 years
Source: Wired
URL Source: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/20 ... ned-to-murder-judges-feds-say/
Published: Jun 24, 2009
Author: David Kravets
Post Date: 2009-06-24 21:51:50 by Old Friend
Keywords: None
Views: 2206
Comments: 76

A white supremacist blogger and internet radio host was arrested and charged Wednesday with threatening to kill judges, the authorities said.

Hal Turner was arrested at his apartment in suburban New Jersey. According to court documents, after a three-judge panel of the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit of Appeals upheld a Chicago handgun ban, he blogged that the judges should be “killed.”

“Let me be the first to say this plainly: These judges deserve to be killed. Their blood will replenish the tree of liberty. A small price to pay to assure freedom for millions,” he wrote on his blog (tunerradionetwork.blogspot.com) on June 2, the day of the ruling, according to court documents. A day later he posted addresses, photos, maps and other identifying information about Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook and Judges Richard Posner and William Bauer, the authorities said.

An FBI agent said (.pdf) Turner told the authorities “he did not intend to injure the judges but believed he would be criminally responsible if someone reading his website acted on what he posted to his website.”

The banner on his Turner Radio Network site includes this logo: “Free Speech: No Matter who Doesn’t Like It!”

Turner, who is to appear in New Jersey federal court Thursday, faces a maximum 10-year term if convicted.

“We take threats to federal judges very seriously. Period,” said Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois.

State charges are also pending against the 47-year-old Turner in Hartford, Connecticut, where he is accused of inciting readers to “take up arms” against state lawmakers.

Two years ago, Turner’s site allegedly was the victim of denial of service attacks by the group, Anonymous. Hackers also claimed he was an FBI informant after posting e-mail allegedly between Turner and an agent. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Old Friend (#0)

An FBI agent said (.pdf) Turner told the authorities “he did not intend to injure the judges but believed he would be criminally responsible if someone reading his website acted on what he posted to his website.”

i doubt the veracity of that statement. i don't think Hal would be dumb enough to say that. at any rate, this should put to rest the accusation that Hal himself is a fed.

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-06-24   22:00:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#0) (Edited)

Jeez....some very prominent patriot radio hosts swore Hal was a fed. Said so right on their show last week. My position has always been *if you aren't positive, don't use that brush.*

It appears he wasn't, eh?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-24   22:02:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

How come presidents, judges and other sorry humans are afforded above the law protection. Some one says they gonna kill me, who cares????

Day by day the ruling elite are becoming....MORE AFRAID....

Cynicom  posted on  2009-06-24   22:04:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom (#3)

If I were charged every time I yelled "kill the umpire" at a baseball game, I'd be facing about 500 years.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-24   22:12:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

some very prominent patriot radio hosts swore Hal was a fed

Each and every one of them should've lost all credibility by now.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

IndieTX  posted on  2009-06-24   22:16:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: christine (#1)

...at any rate, this should put to rest the accusation that Hal himself is a fed.

On the contrary this is exactly what the govt would do if they were trying to repair the damaged rep of one of their own.

Let's see if he somehow escapes conviction or serving any real jail time, and if he continues his campaign calling for the murders of public officials and minorities.

If he's the real thing he'll be convicted and sentenced and as a condition of his release (or suspended sentence) he will be forbidden to operate on the net as before or make threats of any type, and any violation would result in incarceration.

I'm betting that he won't be jailed (or they may put him up for 90 days in some penthouse, but he certainly won't do any hard time in any real prison) and that he won't stop running his intel collection service.

Sadly, some folks will still foolishly believe that he was freed because some jury believed in his "1st amendment rights" and failed to convict him. If he beats state and federal charges, or one or the other declines to prosecute because the other is and he then beats the remaining rap we'll know that he's one of them....

RADIO CAROLINE ONLINE

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-06-25   0:31:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Jethro Tull, christine, Cynicom, lodwick, bluegrass (#2)

It appears he wasn't, eh?

And, surely you can see that this is quite possibly a transparent attempt to repair his rep and put him back into service?

If not for that revelation of him being a fed he probably would not have been charged at all, and it may all be for show to convince folks that he's the real thing.

After the outrageous things he's said and done for years, why now? Why wasn't he charged years ago?

Ask yourself this question: "If Hal Turner was your (govt) snitch and you wanted to put him back into service, what would you do differently?"

Why, they'd do just what they're doing now, unless he's convicted and serves serious jail time which of course he won't.

It is those "people you can fool some of the time" that the govt uses Turner to monitor, and no matter how obvious it is that he's a snitch there will be a certain percentage who'll refuse to believe it and who will continue to leak anti govt plots to Hal Turner.

Anyone who is naive enough to believe that a man can make threats against public officials and minorities for years and remain untouched by the system is also foolish enough to believe that he or she can confide in Hal Turner. We'd both be flabbergasted if we knew just how much intel Turner collects, and how criminally stupid and trusting some of Turner's cult followers really are.

Remember, this is the country where the police can advertise an offer to return a large amount of cocaine that was found in a suitcase and some damned dummy will actually think he can go to the station and legally claim it! People of that ilk would have no trouble believing that Turner can do what he does and stay out of jail while Irwin Schiff rots in jail and is forbidden to sell books or even speak on the subject of taxes!

RADIO CAROLINE ONLINE

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-06-25   0:55:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: HOUNDDAWG, Jethro Tull (#7)

Why, they'd do just what they're doing now, unless he's convicted and serves serious jail time which of course he won't.

It's like witches.

On the bright side, if he does time, he might rediscover he's white.

“However weak the individual white man, his ancestors produced the greatness of Europe; however strong the individual black, his ancestors never lifted themselves from the darkness of Africa.” -- Carlton Putnam

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-06-25   3:25:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#8)

On the bright side, if he does time, he might rediscover he's white.

I wouldn't be any more relieved at that than I would if Benedict Arnold had discovered that he didn't like being a celebrity in England and preferred being one of the "heroes of Ticonderoga".

Had the British successfully captured West Point and His Excellency Gen. Washington that would have been just peachy with the traitorous gimp.

RADIO CAROLINE ONLINE

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-06-25   3:35:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: HOUNDDAWG, Jethro Tull, Christine (#6)

On the contrary this is exactly what the govt would do if they were trying to repair the damaged rep of one of their own.

I think what Dawg said is possible. It is what I was thinking as I read you folks comments yesterday.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-06-25   9:51:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: HOUNDDAWG (#6)

Sadly, some folks will still foolishly believe that he was freed because some jury believed in his "1st amendment rights" and failed to convict him. If he beats state and federal charges, or one or the other declines to prosecute because the other is and he then beats the remaining rap we'll know that he's one of them....

You may be right. But saying that if he beats it you will "know that he's one of them..." You can't "know" it just because he is not convicted.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-06-25   9:53:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: HOUNDDAWG (#7)

And, surely you can see that this is quite possibly a transparent attempt to repair his rep and put him back into service?

The question is this. Unless someone has proof, don't level the charge. It's that basic.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-25   9:57:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: christine, IndieTX, all (#1)

http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/3362

HIs emails were hacked some time ago and they found some interesting things.


Anti Semite Hal Turner Exposed as FBI Operative - By Richard Evans 17th January 2008

Anti Semite Hal Turner Exposed as FBI Operative
By Richard Evans
17th January 2008

Recently two individuals hacked the email database of an infamous internet radio talk show celebrity named Hal Turner. What Turner's own emails revealed was first made public when the hackers posted them on Turner's own internet forum.

Subsequently Turner removed his web site, leaving a notice which implies the host pulled the site as part of a persecution conspiracy against him.
Turner, in the midst of rising rising fame as a poster boys for home grown extremists, has folded up shop. http://halturnershow.com

What happened?

"On Jan. 1, unidentified hackers electronically confronted Turner in the forum of his website for "The Hal Turner Show." After a heated exchange, they told Turner that they had successfully hacked into his server and found correspondence with an FBI agent who is apparently Turner's handler. Then they posted an alleged July 7 e-mail to the agent in which Turner hands over a message from someone who sent in a death threat against Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.).

"Once again," Turner writes to his handler, "my fierce rhetoric has served to flush out a possible crazy." In what is allegedly a portion of another E-mail, Turner discusses the money he is paid."
http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/01/11/neo-nazi-threatmaker-accused-of...

Hal Turner, rising in fame as the most blatant hate talk radio host, self-proclaimed neo-nazi, antisemite, racist who hinted at the need to eradicate Jews - turns out to have been fronting a typical FBI COINTELPRO sting operation.

The only question is, was Turner really the extremist racist scum bag he'd portrayed for at least ten years. Was he just an FBI informer because they'd cut him a deal for something they had on him? Or had he always been an undercover agent, who developed this persona and reputation over many years ?

In one of the hacked emails to one of two FBI handlers, shaug@fbi.gov; Len Nerbetski, "Subject: Threat to Kill Senator Feingold of Wisconsin on July 4", Turner closes with this:

"> Please acknowledge receipt of this warning. Of late, both of
> you have become remiss in acknowledging e-mails.

>
> HT"

Special Agent Nerbetski wrote an excuse:

"I think you forget that I no longer have my
> blackberry and thus no real-time link to the email. I have to be
> logged on to a server to access it. As you know, I don;t have
> one growing out of my ass...Some emails require no comment..."

In another email in this thread, Turner expresses concern about not receiving acknowledgment of when he'd be paid for the tip.

I can only extrapolate, but it read to me that Turner's FBI handlers were already distancing themselves and may have been in the process of hanging him out to dry.

The hackers that obtained and distributed Turner's damning emails haven't identified themselves, and the FBI and New Jersey State Police aren't looking for them. It's only a guess, but it's not out of the question that the FBI were done with Turner and shut him down. Either way, good riddance.

But there's more to the story than it's face value. Who was Hal Turner...Really?

The Hal Turner 'story' as a public malcontent begins nearly twenty years ago, to the early 1990's.

The making of a cointelpro talk show host:

"Identifying himself as "Hal from North Bergen", he achieved notoriety in local conservative circles as a frequent caller to the WABC-AM radio talk show hosted by Bob Grant.[1] Turner parlayed this fame into a role as the northern New Jersey coordinator for Patrick J. Buchanan's 1992 presidential campaign. He went on to serve as campaign manager for Libertarian Murray Sabrin in a number of campaigns in New Jersey in the 1990s, including a 1997 gubernatorial campaign.[2][3] (cited from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Turner )

"After Bob Grant's program was taken off the air for racist content, Turner established a friendship with his replacement, Sean Hannity, ands frequently appeared on his program. Turner then became a talk radio host himself, joining fellow regular callers Frank from Queens and John from Staten Island to start the program The Right Perspective.[4]shortwave radio station WBCQ. Turner left the program in 2002, citing artistic differences. In 2002, Turner became a solo host."

I do recall Pat Buchanan's run for Republican nomination for President during 1992, and I remember the campaign failed due to ABC, NBC, and CBS innuendos that Buchanan was supposedly sympathetic to racists and fascists. Well it's small wonder, since none other than Hal Turner had managed to get into the position of north New Jersey campaign coordinator. The question is: Was Hal Turner associated with the FBI back then? Was he used to undermine Buchanan?

On the other hand, if Turner had been groomed all these years as an FBI asset, why would they suddenly blow his cover?

It's only speculation, Sean Hannity's current rise in the pantheon of FOX right wing rant talk show hosts may be a factor. It wouldn't do to have Turner become America's most famous nazi, and his association with Hannity back in the WABC-AM days go public in a big way.

Temporary Link to this article: http://www.savethemales.ca/index.html

http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/3362


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   10:02:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: PSUSA (#13)

Maybe the hackers are lying. Maybe the hackers are the govt. Maybe he is one of the bad guys. Maybe he isn't Hard to know for sure.

Hell some people think you are a govt agent. Brian S. suggested I was one. Anyone could be one.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-06-25   10:06:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: PSUSA (#13)

And the emails are proof of what?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-25   10:09:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Old Friend (#14) (Edited)

Hard to know for sure.

It Sure is. What exactly would it take to prove it?

We just have to go off of our experiences and expectations, and the realization that it's better to be safe than sorry.

Then we pick up on some things that are said by that person that are total bullshit, but are used to get a desired reaction from his followers. Then ask yourself why he does that. Alex Jones is a prime example but others do it.

This "arrest" smells like BS to me.

“Let me be the first to say this plainly: These judges deserve to be killed. Their blood will replenish the tree of liberty. A small price to pay to assure freedom for millions,” he wrote on his blog (tunerradionetwork.blogspot.com) on June 2, the day of the ruling, according to court documents. A day later he posted addresses, photos, maps and other identifying information about Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook and Judges Richard Posner and William Bauer, the authorities said.

Lot's of us have said that judges that make these kinds of rulings should be killed. I've said it myself, I'm sure. No knocks on the door yet...

What is criminal about posting addresses and pics of judges? I"ve posted pics of judges and the addresses of the sex offending pigs they sentenced to probation and suspended sentences. I dont care what people do with that info.

This, IMO is being used to build up his street credibility. He's being "persecuted" by the PTB... Right.

As far as him being a fed, there are the hacked emails. They have left him alone up until now (supposedly) when he advocated worse things than what he is charged with now. You want someone to be a spy that the target(s) will trust, so he is going to act like his targets, if not more hardcore than his targets.

Otherwise, why would his targets listen to him?

It;s like the feds infiltrating various organized militias. They have a tendency to want to start shit, buy or steal explosives, or goad others into committing other crimes.

.


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   10:33:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: PSUSA (#16)

Lot's of us have said that judges that make these kinds of rulings should be killed. I've said it myself, I'm sure. No knocks on the door yet...

You don't have the high profile that he has. That could explain that one.

I don't follow this Hal Turner guy. I have never listened to his show. I have seen some of his stuff posted here and I knew there were people here interested in him. So when I saw this article I posted it.

I have no idea if he is "one of them" or if some hackers hacked or rewrote his emails.

Just because someone has the guts/stupidity to say some stuff like he said doesn't necessarily make him a government instigator or whatever.

My gut tells me he is just a regular guy and not part of the government snitch program.

They don't need people on the radio blabbing their mouth trying to get people to email them their evil thoughts or deeds in order to catch them. They have echelon and don't need a radio host. As to Alex Jones, I like him.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-06-25   10:40:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: PSUSA (#16)

As far as him being a fed, there are the hacked emails

Do you take into account that they could be fake?

Also just to throw this out. Maybe you are the govt agent and you calling him a fed salvages your reputation. I'm just being theoretical and don't take it personally.

People can over analyze things and then they get ideas in their head and they think they are onto something when in reality they are just weaving a fairy tale in their head.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-06-25   10:42:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: PSUSA, all (#16)

Alex Jones is a prime example but others do it.

What I find funny is that it was AJ who said, once Turner was arrested, "he's a fed." That was last week.

Not for anything, but who should know better than he about tossing that charge around?

All this said, I don't know Turner, don't care much about his life and I grew to find his show a snooze. But as to who is or isn't a fed, IMVHO, it's a baseless charge w/o proof.

BTW, during that email incident, his show was attacked (DOS) every time he tried to broadcast. I was thinking back then, if he were a fed, why would they make him voiceless? I'd think they'd have bought him a decent server and perhaps two hours on one of the better S/W stations.

Just a thought.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-25   10:44:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Old Friend (#18)

Do you take into account that they could be fake?

Yes. They could be fake. Do you take into account that they could be real?

We don't know. We're trying to put a puzzle together when we don't have all the pieces and we dont really even know what the finished puzzle looks like.

Also just to throw this out. Maybe you are the govt agent and you calling him a fed salvages your reputation. I'm just being theoretical and don't take it personally.

Again, also true. I'm just a user typing things on the internet. I know no one here personally. So, you really don't know if I am an "agent" or not.

To those that accused me of being one in the past, when I question and called Jones on his bullshit, I didn't even bother trying to refute them. How could I? And, I really didn't care what they thought of me.

People can over analyze things and then they get ideas in their head and they think they are onto something when in reality they are just weaving a fairy tale in their head.

Again, that comes from trying to put this puzzle together.

But there are certain ACTIONS, and things some people SAY themselves, that make me question them. Those are objective things, things you can point to and say "That is bullshit and I can prove it". Or "That is bullshit, where is the proof".


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   10:59:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Jethro Tull (#19)

But as to who is or isn't a fed, IMVHO, it's a baseless charge w/o proof.

What proof would be acceptable?

It's not the same as being charged with a crime. That level of proof is never there.

It's like the militia infiltration comment I made above.

Get someone in there that wants to stir the pot and commit crimes, he's either 1) nuts and therefore a danger to everyone around him. Or 2) He's a LEO.

And he stirs the pot by spouting lies mixed in with truth.

.


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   11:06:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Old Friend (#18)

I just noticed this.

Turner could be jones' brother. There is a family resemblance, IMO

.


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   11:14:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: PSUSA (#21)

What proof would be acceptable?

An admission by Turner, perhaps arrests of 'followers' with Turner being the documented informant, an FBI agent ID'ing Turner as a CI. Any of those would convince me.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-25   11:22:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Jethro Tull (#23) (Edited)

You're just too cynical. LOL ;)

I cant see anyone admitting to this.

And don't they keep the informants name secret? The way I understand it, and correct me if I am wrong, but informants are used to provide info on where to look for the proof, not to provide the proof. Chain of custody can get a little messy if they do the providing. Keeping their ID secret violates a defendents right to question his accusers.

And a FBI ID the informant? Has that ever happened? I can see it maybe happen, if the agent leaves on bad terms, but then people would chalk it up to sour grapes, etc.

.


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   11:28:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: PSUSA (#24)

You asked for a standard of proof. There they are. Without absolute proof, the charge of Turner being a fed, or AJ, or Statdtmiller, you, me, or anyone else, is w/o merit. That's my only point on this thread.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-25   11:45:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: PSUSA (#20)

Yes. They could be fake. Do you take into account that they could be real?

Sheesh did you read what I said above. We don't know.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-06-25   12:35:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Old Friend (#26) (Edited)

OK, let's put that question aside, since there is no answer that is acceptable to anyone.

Is he trustworthy?

Has he lied? Maybe lies is a bad word choice. how about does he spread rumors and innuendos?

Does he correct his mistakes?

I dont know the answer to that one. If he does, then great. If he doesn't, he's suspect. .


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   13:01:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: PSUSA (#27)

Is he trustworthy?

Has he lied? Maybe lies is a bad word choice. how about does he spread rumors and innuendos?

I don't know or care. I have never even listened to his program one time.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-06-25   13:02:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Old Friend (#28)

OK, fair enough


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   13:04:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: PSUSA (#29)

OK, fair enough

I'll give you this though. I did see somewhere where he had an Amero coing.

Did that turn out to be true.

If not then maybe he is a liar. That and he doesn't like blacks or Jews or something is about all I know of him.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-06-25   13:07:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Old Friend (#30)

It was crap.

www.google.com/search?q=h...official&client=firefox-a

Pick one. Or several.


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   13:12:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: PSUSA (#16)

Lot's of us have said that judges that make these kinds of rulings should be killed. I've said it myself, I'm sure. No knocks on the door yet...

I never said it.

And just because there has been no knock so far doesn't mean one isn't coming.

The judges, like the politicians, are just puppets. The elite would rather you blame their puppets rather than themselves. Sure, they are cowardly little toadies, but that is all they are. They have no real power and aren't responsible for the course this nation and western world is on now.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2009-06-25   13:23:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: RickyJ (#32)

The elite would rather you blame their puppets rather than themselves. Sure, they are cowardly little toadies, but that is all they are.

I dont let them off the hook that easily. They are not puppets. They are responsible for their actions. They are just as responsible as the "elites" are. The "elites" couldn't do it without them.

And they do have real power.

.


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-06-25   13:37:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull (#12)

The question is this. Unless someone has proof, don't level the charge. It's that basic.

Apparently there is enough proof that Hal has a relationship with the feds to suddenly warrant a flurry of "corrective actions" that many of the same supporters were explaining couldn't happen just six months ago.

Back then Hal was just exercising his free expression and was therefore bulletproof and now suddenly it's actionable, and either someone should explain why it never happened before (especially in NJ where Zionists and minorities have so much influence-Hell, why didn't his IP would have shut him down if he was the real thing?) or why it's suddenly happening now that Hal needs to be rehabbed so he can serve as a govt snitch again.

Why do some Americans convict their fellow Americans for non existent tax "crimes"?

Well the answer is simple: They'd rather remain a tax slave themselves than to admit that they were duped for so many years, and some would send a person to prison to avoid facing the unpleasant truth about themselves.

Given a choice between believing that the defendant is a criminal or they the juror is stupid they choose the former, and this is made easier by never examining the evidence of the fraudulent nature of the income tax.

RADIO CAROLINE ONLINE

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-06-26   0:34:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Jethro Tull (#23)

An admission by Turner, perhaps arrests of 'followers' with Turner being the documented informant, an FBI agent ID'ing Turner as a CI. Any of those would convince me.

According to your criteria the Rosenbergs should never have been arrested never mind executed.

If the govt admits that the COINTEL project is alive and well then you'll believe? While you're at it why don't you get the FBI to admit that they set up the OKC bombing?

The day the govt admits to having penetrated the Patriot Movement to that extent will be the day that their other CIs will draw suspicion, and AJ would never survive that. Once we have proof of govt penetration and manipulation AJ will stick out like a turd on a wedding cake.

RADIO CAROLINE ONLINE

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-06-26   0:48:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: HOUNDDAWG (#34)

Apparently there is enough proof that Hal has a relationship with the feds to suddenly warrant a flurry of "corrective actions"

Maybe in your mind, but that still doesn't make your case. Again, that's my only interest in Turner. I don't know whether he (or anyone else who hosts a show) is a fed or not, but until I know much, much more I'll leave that particular smear alone. We're all opinionated people, but when AJ says bluntly "he was a fed", I get to say that AJ is full of shit until he can prove the charge.

What I see in Turner is a guy who couldn't get on the air but once a week, and that sporadically. That's hardly a way for a federal asset to attract disciples, which would be the sole purpose of a Turner. I guess some will have to see the man sentenced and doing time before the obvious hits them, and that's fine. But it doesn't make a premature leap to conclusion any less despicable. It's despicable not because it's Turner, but because it can then happen to anyone else on our side of the political ledger. And Lord knows it does. Hal is but the latest of a long line of radio hosts who have been accused without proof by folks who comfortably sit on the sidelines. I could care less where he spends the next decade, but I suppose if he does go to prison that still wouldn't convince some. Then examples of how the FedGov tosses used assets overboard will be rolled out as "evidence" of his guilt.

As far as your Rosenberg example they were tried and convicted. Subsequently much evidence has since proven the state's case against them. Why you chose to weave them into this is beyond me unless it was to buttress my examples oh how guilt is firmly be established, given the limits of the system.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-26   8:39:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Jethro Tull (#36)

We're all opinionated people, but when AJ says bluntly "he was a fed", I get to say that AJ is full of shit until he can prove the charge.

To my mind, the FBI would throw Turner away before they go thru these gyrations, because if he walks, no one would ever trust him again.

If he goes to jail, the government gets hurt, because some people might wake the hell up.

Odds....he is now tainted meat NEITHER sides wants.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-06-26   9:01:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Cynicom (#37)

Cyni,

From my experience the average person will never, ever know who the agents are. That's the nature of the business here in the States and in every other nation on the planet. My best take on Turner is that he was a very outspoken, pro-white guy and that simply isn't allowed. I'll be the first to change that benign opinion when and if additional info comes along. But as for now he just might be the beginning of the Internet purge we all suspect His Highness has promised. The one the Os clamored for.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-26   9:12:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Jethro Tull (#38)

My rule is never trust anyone, and work from there.

There are many paid snitches or informants, and then there are hordes of patriotic citizens that do their duty and inform on their own Grandmother.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-06-26   9:25:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Cynicom (#39)

My rule is never trust anyone, and work from there.

Absolutely. There is a point in a relationship where trust enters, but it has to be earned over a period of time and under certain conditions. But even if I didn't trust someone, it would be wrong to accuse h/she of collaboration w/o proof. Just my opinion.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-26   9:33:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: All (#40)

HERE

200 rounds of ammo, hollow-point bullets seized from hate blogger Turner's home

by Michaelangelo Conte/The Jersey Journal
Thursday June 25, 2009, 1:47 PM

Jersey Journal file photoHate blogger Hal Turner, right, appears in a Hudson County courtroom with his laywer, Michael Orozco, on June 8.

Infamous hate blogger and Internet radio host Hal Turner had a small arsenal in his home that included 200 rounds of ammunition and 150 hollow-point bullets when it was searched by the FBI yesterday, it was disclosed in court today.

Federal officials told the court of the ammo and guns at Turner's hearing this afternoon in Newark. Turner, who is charged with threatening to kill federal judges in Chicago in a blog post on June 2, was held without bail.


Turner will be held until the value of his mother's Pennsylvania home, which would be used to secure the $200,000 bail bond, could be proven. At that point the judge would reconsider setting a bail.

FBI seized the ammunition as well as three handguns and one shotgun, officials said. Turner's attorney, Michael Orozco, said Turner had permits for the guns.

Turner, wearing a gray t-shirt and blue jeans, appeared relaxed in court today. His hands were cuffed in front of him and his feet were shackled. There was a U.S. Marshal at his sides and a number marshals posted at the door of the courtroom. The hearing was attended by Turner's wife, mother and brother, who spoke with Turner briefly before the hearing.

District Court Judge Michael Shipp said at the hearing he found Turner is a danger to the community based on the remarks in his blog. Illinois authorities say Turner wrote on his blog June 2: "Let me be the first to say this plainly: These judges deserve to be killed."

The Chicago judges apparently has angered Turner with their ruling on a handgun ban.

Shipp today gave Turner a list of conditions that must be adhered to if he posts bail. He order Turner to refrain from using the Internet; he can have no contact with the judges he's accused to threatening; Turner's barred barred from blogging or broadcasting his show; he must surrender all broadcasting equipment he owns; he must remain under house arrest and wear an electronic bracelet; he must forfeit all travel documents like his passport.

Also the judge ordered his wife to serve as a third-party custodian for the government.

Turner is also facing charges that his comments in a blog post -- also posted on June 2 -- was inciting violence against two lawmakers who championed a bill that would provide more oversight of the finances of Catholic parishes.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-06-26   14:17:06 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (42 - 76) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]