[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
History See other History Articles Title: ‘DID HITLER HAVE REASON TO HATE THE JEWS?’ RESPECTED HISTORIAN RALF GEORG REUTH ARGUES THAT HITLER may have had a ‘real’ reason to hate the Jews. Noted for his breadth of knowledge on World Wars I and II and its prominent figures, German historian Reuth has enjoyed much acclaim for his numerous books covering the World Wars era. In his new 2009 book, Hitler’s Jewish Hatred - Cliche and Reality, Ralf Georg Reuth recounts that Hitler blamed the Jews for both the collapse of the German economy and the Russian revolution. Drawing on numerous archives, Reuth paints the social backdrop during Adolf Hitler’s rise to power. “Almost half of all German private banks were Jewish owned,” writes Reuth, “the stock exchange was dominated by Jewish stockbrokers, and almost half of the nation’s newspapers were Jewish run as were 80 per cent of chain stores.” Reuth’s groundbreaking book was reviewed in the June 19, 2009 issue of London’s The Daily Mail in an article entitled, Has Historian Finally Discovered Real Reason For Hitler’s Hatred Of Jews? Of particular note is one of the comments attached to the article made by a British subscriber regarding Jewish influence in Pre-WWII Germany: “I thought this was all fairly obvious.” Indeed, Jewish control of the banks, the stockmarket, the press and commerce, is “fairly obvious” - BUT - to state this obvious fact OUT LOUD will have all the Jews breathing down our necks crying, “Anti-Semitism!” Thank God that finally a historian with repute among the general public has no fear of Jewish attempts to censor the truth. “BLAMING THE LOSS OF WORLD WAR I ON JEWISH FINANCIERS and the budding Weimar Republic at home,” writes Ralf Georg Reuth, “Hitler subscribed to the Stab In The Back theory which was growing in popularity in Germany in 1919.” The Stab In The Back theory attributed Germany’s losing the war not to military defeat on the battlefield, but to the intentional sabotaging of the war effort by Jewish financiers, socialists, and international Bolsheviks. Hitler would later blame Jewish journalists who fled Nazi Germany for inciting belligerence against Germany leading to WWII. To Hitler and many others, it was left liberal politicians and supporters, (German Jewish bankers and their international Jewish network), of the Weimar Republic who ‘stabbed Germany in the back’ by signing the armistice on November 11, 1918. They would soon become known as the November Criminals. HITLER INCLUDED IN HIS LIST of November Criminals, the international Jewish bankers who financed and controlled the Weimar Republic. These Jewish bankers operated both out of Frankfort, (known as the ‘mother city’ of Jewish bankers), and abroad. Frankfort produced its Rothschilds, Lazards, Warburgs, Dreyfuses, Seifs, as well as sending to New York, Jacob Schiff, an agent for Walter Rothschild. (The Jews of Germany, Marvin Lowenthal, 1936). Thus, the ‘Stab in the Back’ theory became hugely popular among Germans who found it impossible to swallow defeat. During the war, Adolf Hitler became obsessed with this idea, especially laying blame on Jews and Marxists in Germany for undermining the war effort. “WITH WORLD WAR ONE LOST and Germany in financial ruin, Hitler came to view the Jews as solely responsible for the growth of Bolshevism,” writes Reuth. In his book, Reuth quotes Nobel prize-winning novelist, Thomas Mann, who equated the Bolshevik revolution in Russia with the Jews. Continuing, Reuth writes: “When a Soviet Republic (Munchner Raterepublik) was declared briefly in Munich in 1919, the die was cast for Hitler to point to the Jews as bearing responsibility for the nation’s ills. Hitler saw that many German Jews played prominent roles in the growing communist movement, which was against everything Hitler the nationalist stood for. Two events - Germany’s defeat of the war due to Jewish financial intrigues together with the Russian revolution and its threat to Germany - shaped Hitler’s views of Jews and his subsequent plan to rid Germany of them all.” View Entire Story Here. A defining moment in the political formation of Adolf Hitler, was the January 1919 Spartacus Uprising (Spartakusaufstand) in Berlin. The prominent figure in the uprising was the communist Jew, Rosa Luxemburg. Luxemburg, along with other left-wing Jews including Karl Liebknecht, founded the socialist Spartacus League (Spartakusbund) in 1914. During the war, Luxemburg drafted the Spartacus programme, Leitsatze, which called upon socialists to turn the nationalist conflict in Germany into a revolutionary war with international consequences. WHILE NOT ADVOCATING VIOLENCE against any specific group, a solution to the “Jewish Question” must be arrived at. For as Reuth points out, and it is certainly applicable today, Pre-WWII Germany saw a tremendous rise of Jewish influence in every sphere of its societal infrastructure. This overwhelming Jewish influence is indeed the situation we now find ourselves in today - both in America and in Europe. The question remains, “What can we do about this preponderance of Jewish influence?” Jews are the most organized power bloc in the world. Thus, to combat Jewish supremacy, Gentiles must ALSO become an organized power bloc. The Jewish-occupied media have convinced the Gentiles that the one organization that can oppose them, the historic Christian Church, (not the Zionist-Protestant innovation), is an institution to be shunned. Thus, many Gentiles will say, “I don’t believe in organized religion.” This is a piece of Jewish brainwashing - exactly what the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion planned. But Jews do believe in organized religion, their own synagogue. The synagogue of the Jews is called in the Bible, “The Synagogue of Satan.” The Church, however, the Bible calls, “The New Jerusalem,” that is, “The City of Peace.” Thus, if Gentiles, who once loved going to Church, can get organized, whether in Church buildings, home groups, or foundations, they can STOP the Jews from taking over America and all the nations that host them.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#3. To: X-15 (#0)
I think this information is about half correct or complete. And it is the half that cannot be discussed or acknowledged directly due to the choke hold the chosen ones have exerted on the US politic. Interesting fact is that about one third of Germanic name words are Semitic in origins.
This may partially explain that phenomenon: "Prior to the nineteenth century the Jews resident in Germany did not use family names. It was “Joseph the son of Jacob,” “Isaac ben Abraham,” the son being designated as the son of his father. But the Napoleonic era, especially following upon the assembly of the Great Sanhedrin under Napoleon’s command, caused a distinct change in Jewish customs in Europe. In 1808 Napoleon sent out a decree commanding all Jews to adopt family names. In Austria a list of surnames was assigned to the Jews, and if a Jew was unable to choose, the state chose for him. The names were devised from precious stones, as Rubenstein; precious metals, such as Goldstein, Silberberg; plants, trees, and animals, such as Mandelbaum, Lilienthal, Ochs, Wolf, and Loewe. The German Jews created surnames by the simple method of affixing the syllable “son” to the father’s name, thus making Jacobson, Isaacson; while others adopted the names of the localities in which they lived, the Jew resident in Berlin becoming Berliner, and the Jew resident in Oppenheim becoming Oppenheimer. Now, in the region of Schoenberg, in the German Rhine country, a settlement of Jews had lived for several generations. When the order to adopt surnames went forth, Isaac Simon, the head of the settlement, chose the name of Schoenberg. It signifies in German, “beautiful hill.” It is very easily Frenchified into Belmont, which also means beautiful hill or mountain. A Columbia University professor once tried to make it appear that the Belmonts originated in the Belmontes family of Portugal, but found it impossible to harmonize this theory with the Schoenberg facts. It is noteworthy that a Belmont became American agent of the Rothschilds, and that the name of Rothschild is derived from the red shield on a house in the Jewish quarter of Frankfort-on-the-Main. What the original family name is has never been divulged." Source: freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i? ArtNum=102561&Disp=7#C7
#7. To: X-15 (#5)
Many Thanks for that info.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||