Title: Gerald Celente Calls For New Party in 2012 Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4RgiuskjeA&feature=channel Published:Jul 11, 2009 Author:Gerald Celente Post Date:2009-07-11 21:23:56 by Horse Keywords:None Views:302 Comments:17
In an interview with Jeff Rense Gerald Celente calls for a new party. The Progressive Libertarians, in 2012. Those of you thought Gerald Celente was a pessimist.
Celente needs FRN's. He is optimistic he can get them, too, obviously.
"This is suspicious at best. Sounds like a bunch of nutty conspiracy theorists, or, as others have pointed out, a government program to find nutty conspiracy theorists who could be dangerous."
Those of you thought Gerald Celente was a pessimist. It boggles my mind to think that he is so optimistic that he believes America will he a sovereign and holding elections 40 months from today.
Yes, I too was surprised by Celente's optimism. lol
Celente has held true to the people retaining the constitution and fighting for it. I think the new party would have Progressive Libertarian ideology but go by a different name.
#6. To: Old Friend, Original_Intent, lodwick, IndieTX, grace_is_by_our_lord (#5)
Liberals suck. Even the progressives as they call themselves. They are actually regressive. We need true conservatives such as myself.
No we need CLASSIC liberals interested in limited government, greater personal liberties coupled with personal responsibility.
… in the past CO2 (or water) was pumped, at some cost, into depleting oil and gas fields to get out more. This will continue, but the taxpayer will contribute to these costs as the oil companies will be paid for taking the unwanted stuff off governments emission balance sheets! No wonder the oil companies are keen on CCS…
If by personal liberty you mean deviants then you are wrong. That isn't true liberty its just sickos twisting words.
And this is why I use the term CLASSIC liberal rather than "conservative". "Conservatives" tend to be just as dictatorial as the "liberals" they despise. Fascism by any other name is still fascism.
… in the past CO2 (or water) was pumped, at some cost, into depleting oil and gas fields to get out more. This will continue, but the taxpayer will contribute to these costs as the oil companies will be paid for taking the unwanted stuff off governments emission balance sheets! No wonder the oil companies are keen on CCS…
Liberals suck. Even the progressives as they call themselves. They are actually regressive. We need true conservatives such as myself.
Uh huh. OF would make "israel" our 51st state. Or maybe just surrender whats left of our sovereignty to them and turn us into their colony. Might as well make it official, right? But then again, you suck too.
Liberals suck, conservatives suck, you suck, it all sucks.
Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism. Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States.
Tending to give freely; generous: a liberal benefactor. Generous in amount; ample: a liberal serving of potatoes. Not strict or literal; loose or approximate: a liberal translation. Of, relating to, or based on the traditional arts and sciences of a college or university curriculum: a liberal education.
Archaic Permissible or appropriate for a person of free birth; befitting a lady or gentleman. Obsolete Morally unrestrained; licentious. NOUN:
A person with liberal ideas or opinions. Liberal A member of a Liberal political party.
lib·er·tar·i·an (lbr-târ-n) KEY
NOUN:
One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state. One who believes in free will.
Problem is, Old Friend, that you fail to understand the terminology. Celente is discussing a LIBERTARIAN progressive party, not a LIBERAL progressive party. A LIBERTARIAN, by definition, is conservative.
This will not be, strictly speaking, a "third" party -- more like a 23rd party. This fragmentation of Obama critics into a multitude of third parties makes it more and more likely that the Republicans will be unable to focus sufficient energy to beat Obama in 2012.