[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water

Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body

Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger

17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES

Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low

Locals Fear Demolitions as Israeli Troops Set Up New Base in Syrias Quneitra

Russian forces discover cache of Ukrainian chemical drone munitions FSB

Clarissa Ward: Gaza is what is turning people overseas against the US

What Parents Wish Their Children Could Grow Up Without

WHY SO MANY FOREIGN BASES IN AFRICA?

Trump called Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron's P*NIS?

New Mexico Is The Most-Dependent State On The Federal Govt, New Jersey The Least

"This Is The Next Level": AI-Powered "Digital Workers" Deployed At Major Bank To Work Alongside Humans

Cash Jordan: ICE Raids Taco Trucks... Deports 'Entire Parking Lot' of Migrants

Jaguar Went Woke & The Results Were Catastrophic


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Republican pundits open fire on Sarah Palin
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw ... op13-2009jul13,0,2642211.story
Published: Jul 13, 2009
Author: LA Times
Post Date: 2009-07-13 10:01:35 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 1474
Comments: 57

Since announcing her resignation, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has been pummeled by critics who have called her incoherent, a quitter, a joke and a "political train wreck."

And those were fellow Republicans talking.

Palin has been a polarizing figure from the moment she stepped off the tundra into the bright lights last summer as John McCain's surprise vice presidential running mate. Some of that hostility could be expected, given the hyper-partisanship of today's politics.

What is remarkable is the contempt Palin has engendered within her own party and the fact that so many of her GOP detractors are willing, even eager, to express it publicly -- even with Palin an early front-runner for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination. Some admit their preference that she stay in Alaska and forget about any national ambitions.

"I am of the strong opinion that, at present day, she is not ready to be the leading voice of the GOP," said Todd Harris, a party strategist who likened Palin to the hopelessly dated "Miami Vice" -- something once cool that people regard years later with puzzlement and laughter. "It's not even that she hasn't paid her dues. I personally don't think she's ready to be commander in chief."

Others suggest a delayed response to last year's shaky campaign performance, now that the race is over and Republicans feel free to speak their minds.

"I can't tell you one thing she brought to the ticket," said Stuart K. Spencer, who has been advising GOP candidates for more than 40 years. "McCain wanted to shock and surprise people, and he did -- in a bad way."

It is more than cruel sport, this picking apart of Alaska's departing chief executive. The sniping reflects a serious split within the Republican Party between its professional ranks and some of its most ardent followers, which threatens not only to undermine Palin's White House ambitions -- if, indeed, she harbors them -- but to complicate the party's search for a way back to power in Washington.

Consider a USA Today/Gallup poll released last week. About 7 in 10 Republicans said they would be likely to vote for Palin if she ran for president. Other surveys place Palin in a statistical dead heat with Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, the former governors of Massachusetts and Arkansas, respectively, who sought the White House in 2008 and give every indication that they will try again in 2012.

Although any presidential poll taken this far out has to be taken with a sea's worth of salt, that is not the reason so many Republican strategists and party insiders dismiss Palin.

"People at the grass roots see a charismatic personality who is popular with other people at the grass roots. But their horizon only goes so far as people who think like them," said Mike Murphy. The veteran GOP ad man eviscerated Palin -- a "political train wreck," "an awful choice" for vice president, her resignation an "astonishing self-immolation" -- in a column published Thursday in the New York Daily News.

"Professional operatives keep their eye on a broader horizon and understand, without independents and swing voters, she can't win," Murphy said. "She's a stone-cold loser in a general election."

That, of course, is debatable and subject to any number of developments over the next few years. A Palin spokeswoman did not respond to requests for comment.

In an interview Sunday in the Washington Times, Palin said she planned to write a book and campaign for candidates nationwide, regardless of party affiliation, who shared her views on limited government, national defense and energy independence.

But the reaction to her resignation from Republican candidates around the country has been telling. Asked if they planned to invite Palin to visit and campaign on their behalf, several of those facing tough races -- the ones who need to do more than turn out the party faithful or collect their contributions -- were not rushing out the welcome mat.

"I don't generally need people from outside my district to do a fundraiser," Rep. Frank R. Wolf, a Republican from the Democratic-leaning suburbs of northern Virginia, told the Hill newspaper.

"There's others that I would have come in and campaign, and most of them would be my colleagues in the House," Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) said in the same piece.

Whatever one thinks of Palin, there is no question she has been subjected to a level of internal sniping -- friendly fire seems like a misnomer -- that is extraordinary.

The Republican criticism of Palin, 45, began during McCain's presidential run, privately at first, then breaking into the open during the last troubled days of the Arizona senator's campaign. Finger-pointing and back-stabbing are hardly unusual in politics, especially on the losing side. But like so many things Palin-related -- the crowds, the adoration, the antipathy -- the verbal strafing seems of a whole other magnitude. (How many other losing vice presidential candidates would merit a 10,000-word exegesis in Vanity Fair, which depicted Alaska's governor as a narcissistic, one-woman demolition derby?)

Some blame sexism, though again there is sharp disagreement between Palin's supporters and detractors. Some think the former beauty queen has always been hurt by her looks, whereas others think her appearance has helped her considerably. "If Sarah Palin looked like Golda Meir, would we even be talking about her today?" Murphy asked.

Others see a knee-jerk reaction from the political establishment, which will always frown on any populist outsider (think Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, Howard Dean), much less a governor who quits midterm and shows up on TV in hip waders.

"The fact that she is a woman who's extremely attractive and dynamic and charismatic throws them for a loop," said Bay Buchanan, who strategized for her brother's two insurgent presidential campaigns. "Once they sense the first little sign of weakness, that's when they go in for the kill."

No one knows where the future will take Palin, not even the governor herself. Her reemergence on the national scene and the scathing response from so many of her party peers underscore one thing, however: Republicans may hold dear their memories of the late Ronald Reagan. But his famous 11th commandment -- "Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican" -- was laid to rest a long time ago.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: christine (#0)

Sarah has values some of the others don't. I don't know if she would be my first choice in the primaries as the field isn't clear as yet. But if she got the nomination I would vote for her. If she ran third party I would also strongly consider voting for her. If little twit songbird Robin hates and is jealous of her. That is a sign that she must be good. Since the little twit songbird favors totalitarianism and murder of babies.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-13   10:05:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: christine, Jethro tull (#0)

The...FEAR...within the political establishment is palatable as evidenced by their crusade against Palin.

Why fear???? Palin gives every evidence of being...OF THE MASSES...

History tells us that the ruling elite always fear and destroy anyone coming from the masses. There is NO OTHER common thread of interest within the establishment.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-13   10:10:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Cynicom (#2)

so cynic. Is that enough for you to vote for her or at least consider it. Inquiring minds are anxiously awaiting your response.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-13   10:18:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#0)

Look at how the "insiders" of that party handled the Ron Paul "insurgency." He was allowed NOWHERE NEAR the nomination and there were probably many votes cast for him in caucuses and primaries which were NEVER COUNTED.

If the GOPers want to, they can strangle Palin's candidacy in the crib — IN THEIR PARTY, that is.

The question then is whether she wants to be Perot in a skirt and then, when the inevitable "messenger" from Rockefeller comes to tell her what will happen to her and her family should she continue, whether she has the guts to keep going.

“I would give no thought of what the world might say of me, if I could only transmit to posterity the reputation of an honest man.” - Sam Houston

Sam Houston  posted on  2009-07-13   10:20:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Sam Houston, Christine, Jethro tull (#4)

Sam...

It does bother ALL in the establishment that Palin just might be of the unwashed.

If that were to be true, and she were to voice a dissatisfaction with Israel/Jews, her insurance company would cancel her policy at once.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-13   10:35:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: christine (#0)

Since announcing her resignation, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has been pummeled by critics who have called her incoherent, a quitter, a joke and a "political train wreck."

Had a commie democrat done the same thing (omessiah for instance), the decision would have been lauded as reflective of strength and character, which is also how broken campaign promises are characterized by the obamaphiles and their Minsitry of Propaganda at the MSM.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

IndieTX  posted on  2009-07-13   10:46:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Cynicom (#2)

History tells us that the ruling elite always fear and destroy anyone coming from the masses. There is NO OTHER common thread of interest within the establishment.

yes, i think you're correct.

this leads me to believe that this was the reason she was selected. she was to be the blame for the R loss.

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-07-13   10:59:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine (#7)

this leads me to believe that this was the reason she was selected. she was to be the blame for the R loss

You are incorrect. She was chosen to appeal to regular people. She made McCains numbers much better. The polls bear this out. McCain wanted to win.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-13   11:03:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Sam Houston (#4)

He was allowed NOWHERE NEAR the nomination and there were probably many votes cast for him in caucuses and primaries which were NEVER COUNTED.

and Ron Paul HAD TO HAVE KNOWN THAT. why was he silent? this is what i'll never understand. imo, this is where he could have made the most impact. he should have screamed from the capitol roof the illegitimacy that are our (ha) elections.

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-07-13   11:03:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: christine (#9)

No one seems to want to account for the record setting $700 million dollars that appeared as if by magic for Obumski.

Hillary STILL owes millions for her run.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-13   11:07:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Cynicom (#10)

Hillary STILL owes millions for her run.

So does John Glenn. That should tell you the timetable for repayment. NEVER!

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-13   11:07:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Old Friend (#8)

mccain knew he was selected to lose.

The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama

christine  posted on  2009-07-13   11:10:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: christine (#12)

mccain knew he was selected to lose.

I disagree with you on that point. I have always despised McCain but Obama makes him seem like a nice old man.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-13   11:11:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: christine (#0)

"If Sarah Palin looked like Golda Meir, would we even be talking about her today?" Murphy asked.

Not legally, no.

“The blacks are very vain but in the Negroes’ way, and so talkative that they must be driven apart with thrashings.” -- Immanuel Kant

“I’m apt to suspect the negroes to be naturally inferior to the whites.” -- David Hume

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-07-13   13:10:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: christine (#0)

The assault continues.

Regardless of whether one agrees with her or not the attacks are clear evidence that she is not under the control of the establishment Military-Bankster Complex and wised up enough during the campaign to figure out some of what is actually going on.

Thus she has to be destroyed as a public figure because were she elected she would be a danger to the plans of those seeking to control the planet and turn all but their own small clique into slaves - both mental and physical.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-13   13:13:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: christine, Old Friend (#12)

mccain knew he was selected to lose.

Exactly - like BobDole, Algore, and the designated losers before him McNutz was selected because he, unlike Ron Paul or Mitt Romney, could not possibly win the (s)Election and thus cause an embarassing repeat of the Bush-Gore "race" where it was pretty apparent that Gore won and so they had to engineer, almost openly, an after--fact defeat for Algore. Not that Gore would have been a prize package but from a PsyOps perspective Algore could not have started all the wars the Duhbya the Beast could.

Poor pathetic souls like Old Fiend don't get it. They are totally controlled by the PsyOps mantras and have ceased rationale thought - instead substituting PsyOps tag lines and believing all their diseased hearts the Psychiatric Control buttons which have been drummed into them.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-13   13:19:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Original_Intent (#15)

Regardless of whether one agrees with her or not the attacks are clear evidence that she is not under the control of the establishment Military-Bankster Complex and wised up enough during the campaign to figure out some of what is actually going on.

Indeed.

We cannot afford to have one from the masses in a position to arouse the passions of the unwashed.

Partisans here attack Palin, not realizing they are doing so...because they are programmed...

Fear brings out hate, and the partisan sheep have not a clue.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-13   13:22:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Cynicom (#17)

We cannot afford to have one from the masses in a position to arouse the passions of the unwashed.

Partisans here attack Palin, not realizing they are doing so...because they are programmed...

Fear brings out hate, and the partisan sheep have not a clue.

Bingo. Anything which cuts across the control lines by causing people to stop and think is something that the Banksters/Psychiatrists want to immediately crush.

Sarah Palin is dangerous to them because she is not from the Plutocrat Class, and as a fundamentalist Christian has a pull in the fundy community which at this point has been firmly neutralized. If they actually got active again they are a powerful force - when united. I don't always agree with them but they are generally pro-constitution and opposed to the sexual perversions of the elites.

As an outsider she has no familial ties in the elite that can be used to corral her, and they do not want to shovel enough money her way to raise her "status" - even if she could be bought - of which I do have doubts. She seems to have a strength of character that defies their control paradigm and she has wised up quite a bit since being picked as the running-mate of the designated loser. For one I am pretty sure figured out that con i.e., that her and McLame were programmed to lose from square one. That recognition on her part has caused her to start looking at and reassessing other things - something the Plutocracy does not want.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-13   13:33:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Original_Intent (#18)

Can you imagine a family so far down the social ladder????

Her husband belongs to the Steelworkers Union, actually gets his hands dirty, how gross can one be???????

Hate being spewed by the elite and MSM is to be expected, but for people calling themselves Americans, to join the chorus is incredible.

People from the masses helping the elite is beyond comprehension.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-13   13:57:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Original_Intent, Cynicom, all (#18)

The personal attacks she has undergone is off the chart, this from both the Rs and Ds. They fear the Perot Factor, biting out 20% of the electorate, hence the attack by the MSM and the dupes who feel comfortable remaining inside the cocoon. I have no idea if she will run, and could care less, but the fact that she's now not 'answerable' to the Party doesn't sit well with them. Despite their best efforts she hasn't left the stage and it's killing them.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-07-13   14:07:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Cynicom, Jethro Tull (#19)

Can you imagine a family so far down the social ladder????

Her husband belongs to the Steelworkers Union, actually gets his hands dirty, how gross can one be???????

Hate being spewed by the elite and MSM is to be expected, but for people calling themselves Americans, to join the chorus is incredible.

People from the masses helping the elite is beyond comprehension.

That is because they are firmly plugged into the Matrix. Those who parrot what the Controlled Mediawhores tell them to think are no better than mind controlled via information control.

Unfortunately not everybody is as intellectually curious as the denizens of this forum and of the 'net in general. I would guess that the people who visit forums like this and actually sift through the information are no more than 2 or 3 percent of the population. Of course something most people are not aware of is that only about 3% of the population actually fought in the Revolutionary War. The elites are aware of that and that is why they, through the layers of superficial disdain, actually fear us.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-13   14:31:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Original_Intent, Cynicom, all (#21)

The disproportionate size of the attack should be a dead give away that it's much, much more than a personality squabble.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-07-13   16:19:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Old Friend (#1)

I don't know if she would be my first choice in the primaries as the field isn't clear as yet. But if she got the nomination I would vote for her. If she ran third party I would also strongly consider voting for her.

Hey stooge! You'd vote for her if she is the pubbie nominee but you would "maybe" vote for her if she ran third party. Why, you're an ass licking neo-con fool just like all the other zionists running the show and your buddy obanger.

What an incredible embicillic statement you've made. I really have never run across anyone close to your ignorance but jim robbersom, the furher of freak republic.

LACUMO  posted on  2009-07-13   16:55:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: LACUMO (#23)

Hey stooge! You'd vote for her if she is the pubbie nominee but you would "maybe" vote for her if she ran third party. Why, you're an ass licking neo-con fool just like all the other zionists running the show and your buddy obanger.

There is a possibility of a better third party candidate. Do you discount that?

Here is a surprise for you. I would even consider voting for Jesse Ventura.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-13   20:30:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Original_Intent (#18)

I agree with what you said to cynicom. Except that McCain was a designated loser.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-13   20:33:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Jethro Tull (#22)

The disproportionate size of the attack should be a dead give away that it's much, much more than a personality squabble.

Yes indeed, very astute.

Whether the hate mongers are correct in their assessment of Palin or not is of no interest, the fact that they are attacking in a very organized fashion is...OF GREAT INTEREST TO AMERICANS...

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-13   23:33:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Old Friend (#24)

There is a possibility of a better third party candidate. Do you discount that?

No I don't. Any candidate would be better as long as they don't fly the israhelli flag and put israhell ahead of the USA they would be a better candidate. Drop the zionist bulls**t and you would be an alright guy!

LACUMO  posted on  2009-07-14   0:36:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Jethro Tull, Cynicom, all (#22)

The disproportionate size of the attack should be a dead give away that it's much, much more than a personality squabble.

An excellent point. They only do this full court smear when someone is perceived as a threat to the established interests. This is the kind of tactic that was used on Ron Paul, and it is used anytime someone threatens the PsyOp envelope which keeps the sheeple corralled.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-14   1:38:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Original_Intent, Jethro Tull, Christine (#28)

This is the kind of tactic that was used on Ron Paul, and it is used anytime someone threatens the PsyOp envelope which keeps the sheeple corralled.

OI...

Go back to the Ron Paul, Trotsky memo...

Anyone that has ever read to any extent about the Russian Revolution and its aftermath, would attach much significance to Pauls usage of the name...Trotsky...

After the memo, Paul swore on bended knee his faith, love and fidelity to the "republican party", forever and always. Why on earth this sudden love and affection for a "party" he was totally against and trying to unseat????????

Trotsky and his friends were trying to unseat Stalin and his cabal, they thirsted for the total power of life and death that Stalin alone held. Trostsky was told to hew the line or else. He continued to agitate and had to run for life, until Stalin finally caught him. No more Trotsky, dead, gone.

The other republican candidates berated Paul on national TV, night after night, making him look very bad, very foolish...AND A VERY WEAK MAN.

The infamous Trotsky memo followed, with his announcement that he would not ever resort to a third party run. That was what the system wanted, and Paul was then marginalized and ignored.

Now recall Perots words about threats against his family??? Odd?? Not really.

And that leads us to Palin.

And to this universal crusade by the system to seek and destroy, all by happenstance?

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-14   5:37:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: LACUMO (#27)

Drop the zionist bulls**t and you would be an alright guy!

That is the nicest thing you have ever said to me.

I am an American. We could cut and should cut off aid to all countries including Israel. I don't think it is right for everyone to blame Israel for everything. It sounds like Nazi Germany. I don't like Nazi Germany. I think if you give up your nazi philisophy you would have to change a few other things to be an alright guy.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-14   8:54:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Cynicom (#29)

After the memo, Paul swore on bended knee his faith, love and fidelity to the "republican party", forever and always. Why on earth this sudden love and affection for a "party" he was totally against and trying to unseat????????

That is an easy one cynic. I would have thought a man of your old age and alleged wisdom would understand it. It is simple. People only elect D's or R's. He also knew Obama was far worse then McCain. A fact lost on the helplessly hopeless. You know the people who whine about everything then don't even vote. They are disenfranchised of nothing. What is it they say. Oh yes...shit or get off the pot.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-14   8:57:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Cynicom (#29)

Now recall Perots words about threats against his family??? Odd?? Not really.

I believe it Perot wouldn't have temporarily dropped out he would have won. I voted for him in 92.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-14   8:58:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Original_Intent, Cynicom, all (#28)

An excellent point. They only do this full court smear when someone is perceived as a threat to the established interests.

I see Cyni touched on some of the others who have suffered the "full court press." I'd add to the list Buchanan, Nader, and going way back, George Wallace who rumbled on about "not a dimes worth of difference."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-07-14   9:00:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull (#33)

If McCain dies before 2012 we could have had a real anti establishment president.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-14   9:03:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Old Friend (#34)

She'll never be president. She might be useful in breaking the stranglehold the National Party has on the nation by laying the groundwork for a new movement. She'd have to dump her war language among some other things for that to happen.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-07-14   9:27:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Old Friend (#30)

I think if you give up your nazi philisophy you would have to change a few other things to be an alright guy.

I don't have a nazi philisophy and I don't have hatred for the jews. I disagree with the way they look at the rest of us and the way they go about killing innocent women, children, and babies. I also do not like how they control just about everything in the U.S. and are destroying it with their control.

They ruined the economy by controlling the banks. They own the illegal federal reserve and have taken over our media, entertainment industries. What's to like about them having seen what they have done in every country they have taken over around the globe. The dislike I and others have for them has been rightly earned.

Our country is fast becomming very socialistic, just a notch below outright communism, and we can thank our jewish brothers who are in control. Do you like what is happening in this country? What they are doing around the globe?

LACUMO  posted on  2009-07-14   10:58:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: LACUMO (#36)

Our country is fast becomming very socialistic, just a notch below outright communism, and we can thank our jewish brothers who are in control. Do you like what is happening in this country? What they are doing around the globe?

I agree with your sentiments. Except to blame it all on Jews is a bit ridiculous. There are plenty of Lindsay Grahams, Barack Obamas, Nancy Pelosis, Dick Cheneys, and other caucasions that are screwing us over. In fact if you got rid of every jew in congress and the senate and every governor and city councilman we would still be in the same mess.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-14   11:03:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Jethro Tull (#33)

Wallace was such a very real threat to .gov that he had to be taken out.

Iran Truth Now!

Lod  posted on  2009-07-14   11:29:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: LACUMO (#36)

Our country is fast becomming very socialistic, just a notch below outright communism, and we can thank our jewish brothers who are in control. Do you like what is happening in this country? What they are doing around the globe?

This can't be argued. I suppose Karl Marx would be hugged by some simply because he was Jewish.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-07-14   11:35:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: lodwick (#38)

He would have gotten my vote.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-07-14   11:35:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 57) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]