[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israeli VS Palestinian Connections to the Land of Israel-Palestine

Israel Just Lost Billions - Haifa and IMEC

This Is The Income A Family Needs To Be Middle Class, By State

One Big Beautiful Bubble": Hartnett Warns US Debt Will Exceed $50 Trillion By 2032

These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Republican pundits open fire on Sarah Palin
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw ... op13-2009jul13,0,2642211.story
Published: Jul 13, 2009
Author: LA Times
Post Date: 2009-07-13 10:01:35 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 1592
Comments: 57

Since announcing her resignation, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has been pummeled by critics who have called her incoherent, a quitter, a joke and a "political train wreck."

And those were fellow Republicans talking.

Palin has been a polarizing figure from the moment she stepped off the tundra into the bright lights last summer as John McCain's surprise vice presidential running mate. Some of that hostility could be expected, given the hyper-partisanship of today's politics.

What is remarkable is the contempt Palin has engendered within her own party and the fact that so many of her GOP detractors are willing, even eager, to express it publicly -- even with Palin an early front-runner for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination. Some admit their preference that she stay in Alaska and forget about any national ambitions.

"I am of the strong opinion that, at present day, she is not ready to be the leading voice of the GOP," said Todd Harris, a party strategist who likened Palin to the hopelessly dated "Miami Vice" -- something once cool that people regard years later with puzzlement and laughter. "It's not even that she hasn't paid her dues. I personally don't think she's ready to be commander in chief."

Others suggest a delayed response to last year's shaky campaign performance, now that the race is over and Republicans feel free to speak their minds.

"I can't tell you one thing she brought to the ticket," said Stuart K. Spencer, who has been advising GOP candidates for more than 40 years. "McCain wanted to shock and surprise people, and he did -- in a bad way."

It is more than cruel sport, this picking apart of Alaska's departing chief executive. The sniping reflects a serious split within the Republican Party between its professional ranks and some of its most ardent followers, which threatens not only to undermine Palin's White House ambitions -- if, indeed, she harbors them -- but to complicate the party's search for a way back to power in Washington.

Consider a USA Today/Gallup poll released last week. About 7 in 10 Republicans said they would be likely to vote for Palin if she ran for president. Other surveys place Palin in a statistical dead heat with Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, the former governors of Massachusetts and Arkansas, respectively, who sought the White House in 2008 and give every indication that they will try again in 2012.

Although any presidential poll taken this far out has to be taken with a sea's worth of salt, that is not the reason so many Republican strategists and party insiders dismiss Palin.

"People at the grass roots see a charismatic personality who is popular with other people at the grass roots. But their horizon only goes so far as people who think like them," said Mike Murphy. The veteran GOP ad man eviscerated Palin -- a "political train wreck," "an awful choice" for vice president, her resignation an "astonishing self-immolation" -- in a column published Thursday in the New York Daily News.

"Professional operatives keep their eye on a broader horizon and understand, without independents and swing voters, she can't win," Murphy said. "She's a stone-cold loser in a general election."

That, of course, is debatable and subject to any number of developments over the next few years. A Palin spokeswoman did not respond to requests for comment.

In an interview Sunday in the Washington Times, Palin said she planned to write a book and campaign for candidates nationwide, regardless of party affiliation, who shared her views on limited government, national defense and energy independence.

But the reaction to her resignation from Republican candidates around the country has been telling. Asked if they planned to invite Palin to visit and campaign on their behalf, several of those facing tough races -- the ones who need to do more than turn out the party faithful or collect their contributions -- were not rushing out the welcome mat.

"I don't generally need people from outside my district to do a fundraiser," Rep. Frank R. Wolf, a Republican from the Democratic-leaning suburbs of northern Virginia, told the Hill newspaper.

"There's others that I would have come in and campaign, and most of them would be my colleagues in the House," Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) said in the same piece.

Whatever one thinks of Palin, there is no question she has been subjected to a level of internal sniping -- friendly fire seems like a misnomer -- that is extraordinary.

The Republican criticism of Palin, 45, began during McCain's presidential run, privately at first, then breaking into the open during the last troubled days of the Arizona senator's campaign. Finger-pointing and back-stabbing are hardly unusual in politics, especially on the losing side. But like so many things Palin-related -- the crowds, the adoration, the antipathy -- the verbal strafing seems of a whole other magnitude. (How many other losing vice presidential candidates would merit a 10,000-word exegesis in Vanity Fair, which depicted Alaska's governor as a narcissistic, one-woman demolition derby?)

Some blame sexism, though again there is sharp disagreement between Palin's supporters and detractors. Some think the former beauty queen has always been hurt by her looks, whereas others think her appearance has helped her considerably. "If Sarah Palin looked like Golda Meir, would we even be talking about her today?" Murphy asked.

Others see a knee-jerk reaction from the political establishment, which will always frown on any populist outsider (think Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, Howard Dean), much less a governor who quits midterm and shows up on TV in hip waders.

"The fact that she is a woman who's extremely attractive and dynamic and charismatic throws them for a loop," said Bay Buchanan, who strategized for her brother's two insurgent presidential campaigns. "Once they sense the first little sign of weakness, that's when they go in for the kill."

No one knows where the future will take Palin, not even the governor herself. Her reemergence on the national scene and the scathing response from so many of her party peers underscore one thing, however: Republicans may hold dear their memories of the late Ronald Reagan. But his famous 11th commandment -- "Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican" -- was laid to rest a long time ago.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

#15. To: christine (#0)

The assault continues.

Regardless of whether one agrees with her or not the attacks are clear evidence that she is not under the control of the establishment Military-Bankster Complex and wised up enough during the campaign to figure out some of what is actually going on.

Thus she has to be destroyed as a public figure because were she elected she would be a danger to the plans of those seeking to control the planet and turn all but their own small clique into slaves - both mental and physical.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-13   13:13:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Original_Intent (#15)

Regardless of whether one agrees with her or not the attacks are clear evidence that she is not under the control of the establishment Military-Bankster Complex and wised up enough during the campaign to figure out some of what is actually going on.

Indeed.

We cannot afford to have one from the masses in a position to arouse the passions of the unwashed.

Partisans here attack Palin, not realizing they are doing so...because they are programmed...

Fear brings out hate, and the partisan sheep have not a clue.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-13   13:22:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Cynicom (#17)

We cannot afford to have one from the masses in a position to arouse the passions of the unwashed.

Partisans here attack Palin, not realizing they are doing so...because they are programmed...

Fear brings out hate, and the partisan sheep have not a clue.

Bingo. Anything which cuts across the control lines by causing people to stop and think is something that the Banksters/Psychiatrists want to immediately crush.

Sarah Palin is dangerous to them because she is not from the Plutocrat Class, and as a fundamentalist Christian has a pull in the fundy community which at this point has been firmly neutralized. If they actually got active again they are a powerful force - when united. I don't always agree with them but they are generally pro-constitution and opposed to the sexual perversions of the elites.

As an outsider she has no familial ties in the elite that can be used to corral her, and they do not want to shovel enough money her way to raise her "status" - even if she could be bought - of which I do have doubts. She seems to have a strength of character that defies their control paradigm and she has wised up quite a bit since being picked as the running-mate of the designated loser. For one I am pretty sure figured out that con i.e., that her and McLame were programmed to lose from square one. That recognition on her part has caused her to start looking at and reassessing other things - something the Plutocracy does not want.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-13   13:33:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Original_Intent (#18)

Can you imagine a family so far down the social ladder????

Her husband belongs to the Steelworkers Union, actually gets his hands dirty, how gross can one be???????

Hate being spewed by the elite and MSM is to be expected, but for people calling themselves Americans, to join the chorus is incredible.

People from the masses helping the elite is beyond comprehension.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-07-13   13:57:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Cynicom, Jethro Tull (#19)

Can you imagine a family so far down the social ladder????

Her husband belongs to the Steelworkers Union, actually gets his hands dirty, how gross can one be???????

Hate being spewed by the elite and MSM is to be expected, but for people calling themselves Americans, to join the chorus is incredible.

People from the masses helping the elite is beyond comprehension.

That is because they are firmly plugged into the Matrix. Those who parrot what the Controlled Mediawhores tell them to think are no better than mind controlled via information control.

Unfortunately not everybody is as intellectually curious as the denizens of this forum and of the 'net in general. I would guess that the people who visit forums like this and actually sift through the information are no more than 2 or 3 percent of the population. Of course something most people are not aware of is that only about 3% of the population actually fought in the Revolutionary War. The elites are aware of that and that is why they, through the layers of superficial disdain, actually fear us.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-13   14:31:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Original_Intent, Cynicom, all (#21)

The disproportionate size of the attack should be a dead give away that it's much, much more than a personality squabble.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-07-13   16:19:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Jethro Tull, Cynicom, all (#22)

The disproportionate size of the attack should be a dead give away that it's much, much more than a personality squabble.

An excellent point. They only do this full court smear when someone is perceived as a threat to the established interests. This is the kind of tactic that was used on Ron Paul, and it is used anytime someone threatens the PsyOp envelope which keeps the sheeple corralled.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-07-14   1:38:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Original_Intent, Cynicom, all (#28)

An excellent point. They only do this full court smear when someone is perceived as a threat to the established interests.

I see Cyni touched on some of the others who have suffered the "full court press." I'd add to the list Buchanan, Nader, and going way back, George Wallace who rumbled on about "not a dimes worth of difference."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-07-14   9:00:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 33.

#34. To: Jethro Tull (#33)

If McCain dies before 2012 we could have had a real anti establishment president.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-07-14 09:03:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Jethro Tull (#33)

Wallace was such a very real threat to .gov that he had to be taken out.

Lod  posted on  2009-07-14 11:29:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]