[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: What Constitutes Racial Profiling? Harvard Scholar, Henry Louis Gates, was arrested on his front porch on July 16th by police responding to a call from witnesses reporting a possible break-in at a residence in Cambridge, Massachusetts. It seems Mr. Gates and another man had to use force to gain entry through a jammed door be it his own. Apparently, he would not have been arrested and charged with disorderly conduct had he simply cooperated with police and shown some identification something an officer must have upon arrival at a potential crime scene in order to make sure the parties involved are indeed who they claim to be. For an officer to simply assume someone at a potential crime scene is not the perpetrator would be careless, irresponsible and dangerous for everyone involved. Verifiable identities must first be established. Gates not only refused to cooperate with officers investigating, but also became belligerent in his objections to their request for identification, reportedly getting loud and tumultuous with police calling their demands racial profiling. Mr. Gates, you see, is an African-American and the arresting officer is not. The fact that Barack Obama commented on the incident at a Wednesday news conference, saying that police acted stupidly, seemed rather odd to me, bringing to mind another controversial identity issue in the news: Obamas own refusal to provide a copy of his original long-form, hospital-generated, birth certificate to prove his American citizenship something every candidate for president must do to satisfy the Constitutional requirement of being a natural born citizen. To simply assume that he is, just because he claims to be, would also be careless, irresponsible and dangerous for everyone involved. If it is eventually discovered that he is not a natural born citizen, then everything he has signed into law, every Executive Order he has given and every appointment he made as the President of the United States of America would instantly become invalid and we would have a national crisis on our hands. You see, Obamas Certificate Of Live Birth, which is posted online, is not the same thing as an original long-form birth certificate something every American citizen must provide a copy of to get, among other things, a drivers license, passport or handgun carry permit. Not only has Obama refused to provide a copy of his original birth certificate, he has also reportedly spent millions of dollars in legal fees trying to prevent its release to the public that is, assuming he has one. This reminded me of the African-American woman I wrote about in January who refused to pay her rent, telling the landlord, We have a new president now and some things are going to change and political activist, Donna Brazile, also an African-American, who, when playfully questioned on live television by ABC News anchor, Charles Gibson about whether or not her stealing the fleece blanket from Obamas chair at his swearing-in ceremony was a felony or misdemeanor, responded: We have a black president its neither. So, Im left to wonder: Is it because we have a black president now that Mr. Obama doesnt have to provide Americans a copy of his original birth certificate? Legally, it would appear that we dont really have one until he does or would that Constitutional requirement also be considered racial profiling?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#2. To: christine, psusa, indietx, jethro tull (#0)
sorry, i had to stop right there anbd back up. because the news is reporting that even the cop and professor agree on several things: among them being the fact that the cop already knew who the homelowner was BEFORE he arrested him. so the guy was not atrrested for refusing to ID himself. the pig knew damned well who he was when he arrested him. now when the guy told the cop who he was. the cop was done, and should have left. but no, as usual, the control freak pig kook showed to the world his power-starved kook nature. the racial issue is irrelevant here, to me at least,. the issue is, why did the cop not leave when the guy id'd himself? as far as the cop not liking the guys attitude, that should not be an arrestable offense.
Not under multiculturalism, no. If they want to live among whites, blacks must abide by whites' definition of disorderly conduct.
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|