[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago! Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain? Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish' Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow? Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst. Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan. Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand? LOOK AT MY ASS! Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency Stealing JFK's Body Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda Biden's Missile Crisis British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon

4play
See other 4play Articles

Title: LP NOTICE: Server crash, downtime: donations are needed
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... .cgi?ArtNum=270728&Disp=22#C22
Published: Aug 1, 2009
Author: Goldi Robinson
Post Date: 2009-08-01 23:53:12 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 2000
Comments: 96

Hi guys;

We had a hardware malfunction, and our sysop has jerry-rigged a repair.

One of the fans that cools the system/ motherboard (?) malfunctioned and died. The motherboard overheated and the entire system shut down.

We do not know yet if irrepairable damage has occurred on the motherboard. If we have more crashes we will need to replace the motherboard.

We did do a memory upgrade which should help the processor from overworking, and with that and the jerry rig, it may hold for a while. The memory was purchased a while back but this is the first time we've been inside the facility to have it installed in our server.

I'd like to take this opportunity to ask for donations so if the motherboard crashes we can quickly replace it.

Service calls are $300 for one hour and $125 an hour for each additional hour and an appointment has to be made. Having some funds available for these repairs will ensure the downtime is as minimal as possible.

Since we have not had a decent fundraiser in sometime due to the system instability (our last fundraiser was disrupted after 2 hours) we need to raise money now.

I paid the $425 from my personal funds. If we need a follow up repair visit, we can't depend on me having the funds available from my personal account.

I may or may not be able to monitor this thread as a fundraising thread, as I don't want to keep the thread too active - and crash the system.

Right now I'm a little concerned about ongoing operations until we get the fan replaced and know if the motherboard was heat damaged.

I am sorry for having to ask you all for donations during these hard times. However, we still owe our ISP funds in arrears of about $800 plus a couple months of usage for about $1200 total. They have been very understanding but they have bills too, and we do need to pay them. It's a bit embarrassing to have to ask them for assistance to access the server when we owe them so much.

I hope we can raise about $2000 to $3000 to clear our bills, have funds to pay bandwith fees, and have some funds available for necessary repairs.

Thanks and I'll keep you apprised of our situation as I get more information...unless the system crashes. At that point, you'll know that repairs will have to be made.

Thanks everyone!

Poster Comment:

I told you so. She's another Rimmy Robinson.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 92.

#6. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

Just goes to show ya, mentally ill white trash pretending to be jewish, should be in psychiatric lockdown, not running a website.

Anybody stupid enough to give the POS so much as a penny, should be locked up with her.

Esso  posted on  2009-08-02   6:13:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

"Just goes to show ya, mentally ill white trash pretending to be jewish, should be in psychiatric lockdown, not running a website."

According to Goldi-lox, she is Jewish.

".....Every Jew I've ever met is really smart...and I mean REALLY smart. Some are even brilliant. A couple who stick out to me are....Isaac Asimov..... Einstein.....

I recently learned that I have the Ashkenazi Jewish genes (Mitochondria type K), and my IQ was tested at 145 some time ago......"

Goldi-Lox posted on 2009-06-25 15:35:54 ET Reply Trace.... (ABRIDGED)

Big Meanie  posted on  2009-08-02   16:53:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

June 05, 2005

IQ And Disease:  The Curious Case of the Ashkenazi Jews

By Steve Sailer

The slow liberation of the Mainstream Media from the deathgrip of political correctness accelerated last week with startlingly courageous coverage in The Economist and the New York Times of the potentially epochal scientific paper by Gregory Cochran, Henry Harpending, and Jason Hardy entitled The Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence [PDF file].

The Economist headlined its anonymous article:

"Natural Genius? The evolution of intelligence: The high intelligence of Ashkenazi Jews may be a result of their persecuted past." (June 2, 2005).

And in "Researche rs Say Intelligence and Diseases May Be Linked in Ashkenazic Genes,"[ June 2, 2005]  the NYT's redoubtable genetics reporter Nicholas Wade reported

"'It would be hard to overstate how politically incorrect this paper is,' said Steven Pinker, a cognitive scientist at Harvard, noting that it argues for an inherited difference in intelligence between groups. Still, he said, 'it's certainly a thorough and well-argued paper, not one that can easily be dismissed outright.'"

The high average intelligence of the Ashkenazi Jews (essentially, Jews from Northern Europe whose ancestors spoke Yiddish, ancestors of the great majority of Jewish Americans) has had an enormous impact on the modern world.

(Jews from the Muslim world score somewhat lower than Ashkenazis, which leads to a sizable social gap within Israel.)

The Economist reported:

"Ashkenazim generally do well in IQ tests, scoring 12-15 points above the mean value of 100..."

Which is not an enormous gap. Assuming a 12 point difference between Ashkenazis and white gentiles, it suggests that the median Ashkenazi scores somewhere around the 80th percentile among all whites. Many gentiles have higher IQs than many Jews.

But this difference in median intelligence does lead to large differences at the far right edge of the bell curve.

For example, some back-of-an-envelope math suggests that Ashkenazi Jews are roughly an order of magnitude more likely than white gentiles to have IQs above 145. Roughly one in 70 Ashkenazi Jews score above 145 compared to one in 700 white gentiles. There are about 30 times as many white gentile adults as Ashkenazi Jews in the U.S. So that implies one-fourth of white Americans with IQs above 145 are Ashkenazi Jews.

Ashkenazi levels of real world accomplishment are impressive and thus support the IQ studies. Jewish Americans make up no more than three percent of the U.S. adult population. But in the 1995 book Jews and the New American Scene, the prominent social scientist Seymour Martin Lipset, a Senior Scholar of the Wilstein Institute for Jewish Policy Studies, and Earl Raab, Director of the Perlmutter Institute for Jewish Advocacy at Brandeis University, pointed out

"During the last three decades, Jews have made up 50% of the top two hundred intellectuals, 40 percent of American Nobel Prize Winners in science and economics, 20 percent of professors at the leading universities, 21 percent of high level civil servants, 40 percent of partners in the leading law firms in New York and Washington, 26% of the reporters, editors, and executives of the major print and broadcast media, 59 percent of the directors, writers, and producers of the fifty top-grossing motion pictures from 1965 to 1982, and 58 percent of directors, writers, and producers in two or more primetime television series." [pp 26-27]

Interestingly, the Ashkenazi cognitive advantage seems to be mostly in verbal and numeric, rather than visual, skills. For example, in Hollywood, fewer top cinematographers are Jewish compared to screenwriters or agents.

Ashkenazi intelligence is one of those facts that are obvious, important, and interesting, yet, is largely unmentionable in polite society… at least until this week.

The Cochran-Harpending theory may turn out to justify the audacity of The Economist and the NYT in breaking this taboo. If validated, it would prove a landmark in the fields of medicine, population genetics, IQ research, and even history.

Wade reported in the NYT:

"A team of scientists at the University of Utah has proposed that the unusual pattern of genetic diseases seen among Jews of central or northern European origin, or Ashkenazim, is the result of natural selection for enhanced intellectual ability. The selective force was the restriction of Ashkenazim in medieval Europe to occupations that required more than usual mental agility… Ashkenazic diseases like Tay-Sachs, they say, are a side effect of genes that promote intelligence."

Wade goes on to note that this theory was anticipated by Jared Diamond, the celebrated author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning Guns, Germs, and Steel (here's my review). Diamond pointed out in 1994 that one possible explanation for these Ashkenazi hereditary diseases is:

"selection in Jews for the intelligence putatively required to survive recurrent persecution, and also to make a living by commerce, because Jews were barred from the agricultural jobs available to the non-Jewish population."

In their brilliant cross-disciplinary essay, which will appear soon in the Journal of Biosocial Science, the three University of Utah researchers show that from about 800 to 1700 A.D., Yiddish-speaking Jews were almost completely confined to cognitively-demanding occupations such as finance, fields in which intelligence pays off more than in peasant farming.

They cite records showing that wealthy Jews had more children survive to adulthood than poor Jews. Moreover, medieval Jews were sufficiently endogamous (marrying within the ethnic group) to prevent gene flow from the gentile population, which might have diluted the effects of this selection mechanism.

Contrary to the layman's assumption that Darwinian selection can only putter along at geological speeds, the authors mathematically demonstrate that the 35 generations during these nine centuries offered enough time for mutations conferring greater business acumen to spread widely among the Ashkenazi.

Sadly, however, there haven't been enough generations for natural selection to refine away the downsides to some of these intelligence-boosting mutations.

Cochran, Harpending, and Hardy cite evidence that the victims of three hereditary diseases that primarily afflict Ashkenazis tending to be smarter than even other Ashkenazis. For example, a study of patients with torsion dystonia, which until recently put 10 percent of its victims in wheelchairs, found their average IQ was 121.

Tay-Sachs and several other Ashkenazi sphingolipid neurological diseases could be analogous to sickle cell anemia, which is the snag in nature's initial attempt to provide genetic protection against the horrendous tropical killer, falciparum malaria.

That mosquito-borne disease appears to have only become a devastating threat a few thousand years ago, when agriculture began in Sub-Saharan Africa. Enough generations have since gone by for the sickle cell mutation to emerge and spread in tropical Africa and other warm places ravaged by this most deadly of malarias. If you inherit a copy of the sickle cell gene from one of your parents, you are more likely to survive falciparum malaria. But, unfortunately, if you inherit copies from both of your parents, you will die in infancy—unless you get modern medical care.

The sickle cell gene increases until the benefit it provides in surviving malaria is equaled by the toll it takes in sickle cell anemia.

The Ashkenazi sphingolipid disorders could be similar. In the great tradition of Einstein's paper on the General Theory of Relativity, the Utah authors have proposed a straight-forward test of one part of their theory: people with one copy of the genes that cause the Ashkenazi sphingolipid diseases should have higher IQs than their siblings who have no copies.

If validated, the implications of this discovery would be extraordinarily broad.

With luck, it could lead to better treatments of victims of these diseases.

It could also aid understanding of the genetics of intelligence, which in turn might lead to "smart pills" or genetic engineering to boost IQ.

Whether or not that would be a good thing for the human race is difficult to say at present. But allowing the honest study of the social impact of existing genetic differences would help us make better informed decisions about whether we want to permit bioengineers to create new genetic disparities in the lab.

The savage persecutions suffered by Jews suggest that high intelligence can generate resentment among the masses. No doubt there will be some who will suggest that the Cochran-Harpending paper should have been suppressed to prevent awareness of the secret of Ashkenazi intelligence from seeping out.

But you have to be a true-blue intellectual to assume that the only way anybody would ever notice anything as obvious as Jewish brainpower is if it gets mentioned in the New York Times. Political correctness doesn't keep facts from being talked about—just from being written about in an intelligent, constructive manner.

On the other hand, the happier experience of another ethnic minority that may also have evolved stronger intellectual capacities under similar urban conditions—the prosperous Parsis of Bombay—may offer clues to mitigating envy.

In any case, the Cochran-Harpending paper offers a fairly new but crucial perspective on the old nature and nurture question. The researchers have demonstrated that it's quite possible for nurture to change nature. Culture can drive heredity. Economics and social customs alter gene frequencies.

Of course, we already knew that from examples such as lactose intolerance. Once, virtually no adult could easily digest milk. But after some tribes started herding and milking dairy livestock, one or more mutations providing lactose tolerance popped up and spread among them. Thus today, only two percent of Danes are lactose intolerant, compared to 90 percent of Asian Americans.

There may be many more examples of the environment molding genes. For instance, I recently described how the economics of tropical agriculture, in which mothers could frequently raise enough food to feed their children without much help from the fathers, tend to differ from the economics of temperate agriculture, where the labor of fathers often made the difference between their kids' survival or starvation. This leads to different family structures and different behavioral tendencies between tropical and Eurasian men -- what Harpending calls the "Cad vs. Dad" pattern of low vs. high paternal investment.

Are those disparities, which appear to manifest themselves in the large racial inequality in illegitimacy rates seen in modern America, cultural or innate?

Certainly they started out being cultural. But it's possible that selection made them partially inborn over time.

Finally, it's not surprising that Henry Harpending and Gregory Cochran came up with such a stunning paper.

Harpending, who is with the University of Utah's outstanding anthropology department, is one of the leading population geneticists. Unusually for such a mathematically-oriented scientist, he has also lived for 42 months in the field with African tribes. Indeed, his love of Africa is so great that he almost left academia at one point to become a safari guide.

I stay in touch with some quite smart people, but even among them, Gregory Cochran is legendary for the ferocity of his scientific originality.

The Economist describes Gregory Cochran as:

"… a noted scientific iconoclast... He is that rare bird, a scientist who works independently of any institution. He helped popularize the idea that some diseases not previously thought to have a bacterial cause were actually infections, which ruffled many scientific feathers when it was first suggested. And more controversially still, he has suggested that homosexuality is caused by an infection."

The Atlantic Monthly's February 1999 cover story by Judith Hooper, "A New Germ Theory," was about Cochran and another of his research partners, Paul Ewald, and their Darwinian theory for why more diseases will turn out to be caused by infections that doctors then expected. This year, the American Academy of Microbiology endorsed liberalizing Koch's Postulates, which have been the basis for determining if a disease is infectious since the 19th Century, along the lines Cochran and Ewald proposed. 

The Atlantic noted:

"Cochran is a solo player, with an encyclopedic mind (he is a former College Bowl contestant) and a manner that verges on edginess."

I can attest that, although a physicist by education and the leading theorist of evolutionary medicine by avocation, Cochran also has memorized almost the entire political and military history of the human race. (Here's an amusing piece by him in The American Conservative showing the similarities between Bush's Iraq adventure and Napoleon's invasion of Spain.)

When I'm reviewing a historical film such as Master and Commander or Hero and I need to pretend to actually know something about the Age of Nelson or China's Warring States era, a call to Cochran will not only fill me in on what happened, but, more importantly, why it happened.

All the evidence isn't in yet. But it could be that Cochran and Harpending have opened the door to explaining why some of history's most important developments happened—and that, finally, the political culture is beginning to listen.

[Steve Sailer [email him] is founder of the Human Biodiversity Institute and

movie critic for The American Conservative. His website www.iSteve.blogspot.com features his daily blog.]

>

christine  posted on  2009-08-02   19:02:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

"'It would be hard to overstate how politically incorrect this paper is,' said Steven Pinker, a cognitive scientist at Harvard, noting that it argues for an inherited difference in intelligence between groups. Still, he said, 'it's certainly a thorough and well-argued paper, not one that can easily be dismissed outright.'"

The high average intelligence of the Ashkenazi Jews (essentially, Jews from Northern Europe whose ancestors spoke Yiddish, ancestors of the great majority of Jewish Americans) has had an enormous impact on the modern world.

(Jews from the Muslim world score somewhat lower than Ashkenazis, which leads to a sizable social gap within Israel.)

The Economist reported:

"Ashkenazim generally do well in IQ tests, scoring 12-15 points above the mean value of 100..."

Note the bias in the hypothesis - it is assumed, without proof, that intelligence is a genetically inheritable trait. A hypothesis for which there is no evidence.

Because of that assumed bias then it becomes a "self fulfilling prophecy" i.e., that all differences between population groups can be ascribed to genetic cause i.e., nature not nurture.

As well, at play, is the fallacy of division i.e., that what is true for an individual is true for a group.

One of the known biases of I.Q. testing is literacy level i.e., persons with higher literacy levels have better comprehension of a written I.Q. test and will score higher than those with a lower literacy and/or different vocabulary than that assumed in the writing of the test. A great case study of this was WWII vintage Military I.Q. Tests which used a vocabulary common to city dwellers. Thus recruits coming from rural areas, and small towns, who had a different common vocabulary scored lower, sometimes much lower, not because they were less intelligent but because the test was written in a vocabulary they did not use.

Returning to the article and its presumptions: "Interestingly, the Ashkenazi cognitive advantage seems to be mostly in verbal and numeric, rather than visual, skills."

So, we return to vocabulary and its affect on I.Q. testing. Given that someone with a richer vocabularly is going to score higher than someone of equal intelligence with a smaller vocabulary then we can begin to understand the data in a different light - that of culture. So, I would offer as a counter hypothesis that one could, and in fact must in order to make an accurate measurement, control for literacy level. To ascribe the differences to any cause other than vocabulary, thus literacy level, is inherently erroneous. One can just as easily, and not without merit, assign the differences noted to the particular cultural bias toward or against education and literacy. That is not to say that there are differences in intelligence from individual to individual but to ascribe those differences to genetics is to assume a conclusion a priori' i.e., to a common genetic characteristic of a human subgroup. Differences between individuals are easily observable - we a all know people who are quick and bright and others who are just a little slow (or even a lot slow). And intelligence, raw I.Q. as measured on I.Q. tests, is not the only factor in evaluating the worth, or survival potential, of another individual.

As the article pointed out the occupations open to Jews historically put a premium upon literacy. Throughout Western History one can find that Jews were often used as scribes and accountants. From the fall of Toledo in 1085, where the Muslim rulers used Jews in just that capacity, through the rise of literate Western "Civilization" one can find that Jews were heavily over represented in fields requiring literacy as those were among the few fields open to them. Therefore it became a cultural imperative, a survival necessity, to be literate, and to pursue a literate education. One can find this same trait of prizing literacy common to all of the groups who score high in I.Q. testing as a group. The Chinese, and Japanese, who have for centuries valued scholarship as one of the highest attainments an individual can seek, score highest among all groups. Is this because the Chinese are endowed genetically as a group with higher intelligence or is it because in their culture literacy is pushed almost manically?

A quote I am fond of, and have used before, is that what you see is determined in no small part by what you know. So, if someone "knows" that intelligence is solely and only a genetic trait that is what they will "see". That is what their "knowledge" tells them and their viewpoint is established by that knowledge.

If one goes through this article one can see that there is an underlying and unquestioned premise of Darwinian Selection i.e., that Darwin was right and that it is simply a matter of nature and not nurture, and yet that is not what the data tells us. It tells us that groups that have a cultural imperative valuing literacy score higher on I.Q. tests and that we also know that I.Q tests are as much a test of literacy as they are of intelligence. So, it seems perfectly natural to see individuals coming from cultural groups valuing literacy score higher on I.Q. Tests.

As check on this we should be able to predict that groups that have a cultural bias against literacy would, as a group, score below average. So, is that true? Well we can take the mistaken hypothesis of the "Bell Curve", discarding the conclusion that it is genetic, and look at which groups fare best and worst. The group in America that fares worst are Black Americans, taken as a group, and therein we find a cultural bias against learning i.e., "you actin' white". In fact there is a strong cultural pressure to remain illiterate and poorly educated. Those who do not conform to that sadly twisted cultural bias are picked on, ostracized, and otherwise pressured to conform to the group norm of not valuing education. It is no mystery that with that viewpoint in place that blacks score lower on I.Q. tests - but it is because their group literacy level is lower and thus as a group they do worse on I.Q. tests which do demand literacy.

Q.E. D.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-08-03   2:02:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

thank you for this excellent analysis and rebuttal to the article.

christine  posted on  2009-08-03   11:13:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You are most welcome and I in turn thank you for the kind words. It is a subject upon which I have a great deal of interest. I do wish I had a late "edit" function since I caught another typo, and might tweak the wording here and there. However, I wrote it late at night and it shall stand as is. ;-)

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-08-03   13:02:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 92.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 92.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]