[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Enlisting in the Military and the Decision To Kill
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/crovelli/crovelli31.1.html
Published: Aug 3, 2009
Author: Mark R. Crovelli
Post Date: 2009-08-03 06:24:06 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 187
Comments: 11

In the fall of 1999, I walked into an Army-Navy recruiting station in Boulder, Colorado in an attempt to enlist in the United States Armed Services. At the time, I was almost fanatically devoted to the Republican Party, (having gone so far as to re-found the Young Republicans’ Club at Fort Lewis College the year before), and I thought it was my duty in some sense to "serve my country" with a few years of my life spent in the military. I had always been an athlete, having played both soccer and rugby in high school, and I thought that recruiters would be literally tripping over themselves trying to enlist me into their respective branches of service. As it turned out, I was right to think that I was a prime candidate that recruiters would love to claim credit for enlisting. After I took a sample ASVAB test (which is apparently utilized, based upon its level of sophistication, to weed out the stupendously stupid from the only slightly moronic), the recruiters turned into my best friends – offering to help me to get into an officer-training program, since my scores were high enough.

I spoke with the recruiters for a few hours, with my mind all but settled on enlisting in some capacity, and I happened to ask them about several injuries I had suffered in high school. I had broken both of my legs playing soccer – including a femur – and I wanted to know whether the military would care that I had five screws in my legs. The question was on my mind because my father had been evaluated for military service in his youth and was deemed to have such flat feet that he would not qualify. The recruiters’ faces darkened when they heard the question, but they told me that I shouldn’t have any problems enlisting as long as I "forgot" to tell anyone that I had them. (You have to remember that back in those days the military actually had criteria for enlistment. This might be hard to believe, but it was possible, way back then, to be denied the ability to enlist because you were too fat, dumb, blind, or criminally inclined.) They informed me, however, that if I did choose to "forget" to tell anyone about the screws and I got injured, the injuries might not be covered by the military if it was related to my "previously existing condition" (You didn’t really think that phrase would cease to exist under socialized healthcare, did you?)

I left the recruiting station with seriously mixed feelings about enlisting. I still felt that I had a responsibility to enlist, if I could, in order to "serve my country," (I used that phrase incessantly at the time), but I was wary of having to lie my way in. I was also very aware that I could break another bone in one of my legs – as I did in fact do, several years later – which would have left me with a huge unfunded medical bill on my hands. To top things off, I felt seriously insulted that they thought I wasn’t a top-notch potential enlistee, just because I had a few titanium screws in my legs. I was playing collegiate rugby at the time, in the top physical condition of my life, and I felt that I could compete with the best of the best that the army could scrounge up. It shook my faith in the competence of the military to think that it would deem my father unfit for service just because he had flat feet, (even though he was an accomplished collegiate sprinter), and deem me unfit for service just because I had screws in my legs.

With the passage of several months, however, the thought of enlisting in the military completely faded from my thoughts. Then, in the fall of 2001, all my thoughts about enlistment in the military came flooding back to me. It wasn’t that the sight of the 9-11 attacks suddenly rekindled my previous desire to join up. On the contrary, by that time I had already definitively decided that the military wasn’t right for me anyway. What brought all my previous thoughts back to me was the realization that if I had chosen to enlist in the military that fateful day in 1999, as I truly intended to do when I walked into that recruitment center in Boulder, I would almost certainly have been on my way to war. I would have been preparing to board a plane or ship in order to cross the ocean in order to try to kill or subdue people that I had never met.

I had not thought about the seriousness of what I was doing when I walked into that recruitment center. Bill Clinton was in office at the time, and his belligerency had always been confined to invading only the most obscure and irrelevant countries in the world in a dilettantish (albeit deadly) fashion. It never occurred to me when I told the recruiter that I wanted to enlist that I was essentially giving my consent to go fight in a future decade-long guerrilla war in a tribal wasteland or to go fight in an urban free-for-all in the desert.

That’s what really troubled me when I thought about how very close I had come to joining the military; the realization that I would have had to go to war whether I thought it was just or not. I would have voluntarily put myself in a position where other people – people I had never met – would have been able to tell me when and under what circumstances I would have to board a plane or a ship to go kill other people I had never met. And to top things off, those people I had never met who would have the right to tell me when to kill were politicians – the very same slippery scoundrels I had heard lying to me with a straight face my entire life. It was truly bone chilling to realize how close I came to surrendering my moral sovereignty to people I not only didn’t know, but in whom I had no trust to begin with.

To surrender the ability to decide when and under what circumstances a man will kill other human beings is a serious matter – one that ought not to be taken lightly or entered into as though he is signing a car lease. Indeed, the decision to kill is the most serious moral decision a man can make in his life, which is precisely why he ought not to surrender the decision to anyone under any circumstances. The decision to kill ought not to be surrendered to a man’s wife, to his mother, or to his brother – and it especially ought not to be surrendered to the most mendacious creatures to walk the face of the Earth: politicians. If a man finds himself in a position where he must kill in order to protect himself or his family, he will know what decision he must make, but to kill other human beings just because a politician says so is the height of moral recklessness and irresponsibility.

So, if you are a young man like I was, seeking to "serve his country" by enlisting in the military, I beg of you to consider the seriousness of your decision. Realize that you will be signing over your ability to decide when to kill real, living human beings to the very same people who have made a living for themselves by lying to us. Think about whether you will really be serving this country by killing or dying in some far-off desert or rocky wasteland. Think about whether you could do more for this country by buying a rifle, learning how to use it, and being ready to use it in actual self-defense of yourself and your family.

Don’t make the same mistake that I did in failing to consider the seriousness of enlistment. You might not have flat feet or screws in your legs to prevent you from doing something you will regret for the rest of your life.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Think about whether you will really be serving this country by killing or dying in some far-off desert or rocky wasteland. Think about whether you could do more for this country by buying a rifle, learning how to use it, and being ready to use it in actual self-defense of yourself and your family.

If you care about the young people and the country, discourage enlistment.

We have to disassemble the empire.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-08-03   7:18:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

They informed me, however, that if I did choose to "forget" to tell anyone about the screws and I got injured, the injuries might not be covered by the military if it was related to my "previously existing condition" (You didn’t really think that phrase would cease to exist under socialized healthcare, did you?)

This young man speaks of "decisions" he had to make.

He may rest assured that there will come a time when all decisions regarding military service will be made for him. That is one problem he may erase from his mind.

As for the screws, in 1950 a brand new war was unleashed for young Americans, we were invited to serve, I had one leg that was shattered a year before and was held together by screws, with the very visible ugly scars.

Being a volunteer to avoid the infantry, the Air Force never questioned the obvious, later even passing a flight physical, and no one asked.

Of 713 of us that fateful day, not one man failed. Every man jack went off that very night.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-08-03   8:23:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada (#0)

The decision to kill ought not to be surrendered to a man’s wife, to his mother, or to his brother – and it especially ought not to be surrendered to the most mendacious creatures to walk the face of the Earth: politicians. If a man finds himself in a position where he must kill in order to protect himself or his family, he will know what decision he must make, but to kill other human beings just because a politician says so is the height of moral recklessness and irresponsibility.

Excellent article. Thanks for posting it.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-08-03   8:41:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: James Deffenbach (#3)

but to kill other human beings just because a politician says so is the height of moral recklessness and irresponsibility.

recklessness and irresponsibility??????

That decision does not rest with the individual, never has and never will.

Such high mindedness carries itself even further in that when your friends and neighbors are called to serve, will this person stand up and fight the system to save his neighbors etc?????

Sounds good James but it never happens.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-08-03   8:51:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

Keep in mind that it is the socialists in government, who demonize the military every chance they get, that are pushing for a military draft.

PaulCJ  posted on  2009-08-03   9:08:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: PaulCJ (#5)

Keep in mind that it is the socialists government, who demonize the military every chance they get, that are pushing for a military draft.

Conscription may be the only way they can continue to obtain the talented healthy males they need. Also, the wars keep the most combat-able men overseas and busy, not at home protecting their state and their home from the despot feds.

Quality of enlistees has really dropped. Now it's any warm body will do. But they need talented men with some brains to operate and keep all their high-tech gadgets working.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-08-03   11:20:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Cynicom. JD, all (#4)

recklessness and irresponsibility??????

That decision does not rest with the individual, never has and never will.

What he may have been alluding to is the time when we will all be called to account for ourselves and our actions.

Iran Truth Now!

Lod  posted on  2009-08-03   11:24:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: TooConservative (#1)

If you care about the young people and the country, discourage enlistment.

We have to disassemble the empire.

I am in the fortunate position to be able to do this. As a person who spent 15+ years in the army and have returned to college, kids in my class ask me about military service on a somewhat regular basis. I do my best to steer them away from joining. So far it's worked.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976

The purpose of the legal system is to protect the elites from the wrath of those they plunder.- Elliott Jackalope

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2009-08-03   11:48:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Hayek Fan (#8)

Of the handful of times I weighed in, none of them signed up. One kid did sign up before I could talk to him.

You know, so much of the time they just need to hear one adult say, "Don't go, don't sign up to die for Obama in Afghanistan for people who hate you."

Really, most of them want someone to talk them out of it.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-08-03   13:46:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: TooConservative, Hayek Fan (#9)

Of the handful of times I weighed in, none of them signed up. One kid did sign up before I could talk to him.

You know, so much of the time they just need to hear one adult say, "Don't go, don't sign up to die for Obama in Afghanistan for people who hate you."

Really, most of them want someone to talk them out of it.

The fundamental problem is that most of us, the sane ones, desire to serve our fellows and to stand in defense of that which we love. That is why I joined and it is why many join. That the military is held out at a way to do this, falsely, makes it attractive.

So, the problem boils down to pointing out how military service is not and has never, except in times of national danger, been an avenue to do that. It offers excitement, adventure, danger, risk, and has been perverted to ignoble causes. It takes idealistic young men and women and turns them into tools of oppression for a government controlled by psychotics.

Pointing that out, convincingly, to a young person is what is required to convince them not to join that war machine and serve the wishes of wealthy psychotics who regard them as little better than dumb animals.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-08-03   13:59:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: TooConservative (#6) (Edited)

Conscription may be the only way they can continue to obtain the talented healthy males they need. Also, the wars keep the most combat-able men overseas and busy, not at home protecting their state and their home from the despot feds.

You miss my point. The only ones in government for the draft are the same ones want soldiers tried for the wars the same socialists (for the draft) claim to be against.

The socialists want literal sacrifices of lives for their own sick agendas.

PaulCJ  posted on  2009-08-03   15:25:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]