See other Immigration Articles
Title: Dengue fever outbreak in Mexico causing concern in Texas
Source:
KENS 5 Eyewitness News
URL Source: http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/me ... 1805.kens.dengue.88b9f586.html
Published: Aug 19, 2005
Author: Angela Kocherga
Post Date: 2005-08-19 00:34:51 by robin
Keywords: outbreak, causing, concern
Views: 188
Comments: 20
Angela Kocherga An outbreak of dengue fever in Mexico has health officials here in Texas keeping a watchful eye across the border. More than 100 people have been infected in the southern state of Morelos. Several people have the hemorrhagic strain of the disease that causes bleeding and, if untreated, possibly death. To prevent the spread of the disease, health workers need to enlist the help of the residents. Oswaldo Zambrano, dengue fever prevention program director, says the enemy lives among them. He warns residents that they are providing a safe haven for the mosquitoes that carry dengue fever. Many homes have standing water, which provides a perfect breeding ground for infected mosquitoes. A chemical that is safe for human and animal consumption must be mixed into the water to prevent new infestations. The movement of people poses another challenge. If someone from an area where there's been an outbreak of dengue fever travels to another place, that person can be bitten by mosquitoes in the new location and the infection will spread. Thus, it is critical to control the disease in every region of Mexico and reach every home during the rainy season. And if you're planning a trip to an area of Mexico where there's outbreak, use mosquito repellant.
KENS 5 Eyewitness News
Submit feedback to Angela To report a news tip, press #5 on your Cingular phone. More coverage Center for Disease Control
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#1. To: Red Jones, robin (#0)
At the risk of hijacking robin's thread (please forgive me), I made the point on another thread: Well, dengue is contagious and spreads among squalor. So, robin's article reports: And if years from now we find that chemical wasn't as safe as scientists thought, will the Mexican and Texan health officials be guilty of mass murder, or only Israeli's if they use use it also?
Fartwind, if Sharon ever came to a sudden halt your face would cram halfway up his ass.
Ah, the ad hominem attack, last refuge of the bankrupt argument.
Nah, more like a simple observation. You're not looking for valid argument. You're looking for yes-men like your creed insists on. I've argued you into corners and you know it. Just search comments from "Lebowski" to "wind" if you need a refresher.
lol - yeah, with you leading the way into those corners everytime. Here's your most recent: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=6940&Disp=67#C67 Lurkers can back track from there
http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=6940&Disp=67#C67 Lurkers can back track from there Thanks for bringing that up. You never did explain why I should be impressed with Dr. Schroeder's skills at division. Following speculation that the universe is X amount of years old, extrapolate a number for each of the six days in creation and viola they all add up. I can do it too! More importantly, since you're so good at timelines why did dinosaurs and other featherless bipedal hominids precede man on this earth already equipped mentally any physically to be mean to each other? Doesn't that pretty much blow the concept of original sin to shit? Or has the Asiatic sky-emperor and son that you debase yourself before just not sat down in their rightful place in history next to Osiris and Horus?
lol - that would be because he didn't use division, though his math was laid out in front of you, you didn't understand it. And now I'm done hijacking robin's thread.
I know the Hebrew (Dr. Schroeder is an Orthodox) mind as well as anyone. Their science always starts out with a conclusion and works it's way backwards. From your own post: The calculations come out to be as follows: The first of the Biblical days lasted 24 hours, viewed from the "beginning of time perspective." But the duration from our perspective was 8 billion years. The second day, from the Bible's perspective lasted 24 hours. From our perspective it lasted half of the previous day, 4 billion years. The third 24 hour day also included half of the previous day, 2 billion years. The fourth 24 hour day -- one billion years. The fifth 24 hour day -- one-half billion years. The sixth 24 hour day -- one-quarter billion years. When you add up the Six Days, you get the age of the universe at 15 and 3/4 billion years. The same as modern cosmology. Is it by chance? Forward: And now I'm done hijacking robin's thread. What scared you away Fartwind? The dinosaur question? What does Dr.Schroeder have to say about that?
#9. To: Dude Lebowski (#8)
What you see were the results of Dr.Schroeder's "calculations", the answers. The math, as previously explained repeatedly to you which you still don't seem to get, were Einstein's relativistic time dilation between two accelerating reference frames. Essentially the formula is: I'll leave it to you now to show us all the "division".
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest they had a contagious disease resulting from their prior squalid living conditions (not unlike the squalid living conditions in other countries that today give rise to other diseases).
A chemical that is safe for human and animal consumption must be mixed into the water to prevent new infestations.
#2. To: Starwind (#1)
will the Mexican and Texan health officials be guilty of mass murder, or only Israeli's if they use use it also?
#3. To: Dude Lebowski (#2)
>> Fartwind, if Sharon ever came to a sudden halt your face would cram halfway up his ass.
#4. To: Starwind (#3)
Ah, the ad hominem attack, last refuge of the bankrupt argument.
#5. To: Dude Lebowski (#4)
I've argued you into corners and you know it.
#6. To: Starwind (#5)
Here's your most recent:
#7. To: Dude Lebowski (#6)
You never did explain why I should be impressed with Dr. Schroeder's skills at division.
#8. To: Starwind (#7)
lol - that would be because he didn't use division, though his math was laid out in front of you, you didn't understand it.
Replies to Comment # 8. The calculations come out to be as follows:
T1 - T2 = ( t1 - t2 ) [1 - (v2/c2)].05
Dr. Schroeder plugged in his understanding of the velocity v at given delta's of time t for the inertial reference frame and computed the resulting delta's of time T you see for the object reference frame.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.