[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cash Jordan: “We’re Coming In"... Migrant Mob ENTERS ICE HQ, Get ERASED By 'Deportation Unit'

Opioids More Likely To Kill Than Car Crashes Or Suicide

The association between COVID-19 “vaccines” and cognitive decline

Democrats Sink to Near Zero in New Gallup Poll, Theyre Just Not Satisfied

She Couldn't Read Her Own Diploma: Why Public Schools Pass Students but Fail Society

Peter Schiff: Gold To $6,000 Next Year, Dollar Index To 70

Russia Just Admitted Exactly What Everyone – But Trump – Already Knew About Putin's Ukraine Plans

Sex Offenses in London by Nationality

Greater Israel Collapses: Iran the Next Target

Before Jeffrey Epstein: The FINDERS

Cyprus: The Israeli Flood Has Become A Deluge

Israel Actually Slaughtered Their Own People On Oct 7th Says Israeli Newspaper w/ Max Blumenthal

UK Council Offers Emotional Support To Staff "Discomforted" By Seeing The National Flag

Inside the Underground City Where 700 Trucks Come and Go Every Day

Fentanyl Involved In 70% Of US Drug Overdose Deaths

Iran's New Missiles. Short Version

Obama Can't Bear This. Kash Patel Exposes Dead Chef Revelation. Obama’s Legacy DESTROYED!

Triple-Digit Silver Imminent? Critical Mineral, Backwardation & Remonetization | Mike Maloney

Israel Sees Sykes-Picot Borders As 'Meaningless' & 'Will Go Where They Want': Trump Envoy

Bring Back Asylums: It's Time To Talk About Transgender Fatigue In America

German Political Parties (Ex-AfD) Sign 'Fairness Pact' That Prevents Criticizing Immigration

CARVING .45 CALIBER AUTOMATICS OUT OF STEEL WWII UNION SWITCH AND SIGNAL MOVIE

This surprising diabetes link could protect your brain

Putin and Xi to lay foundations for a new world order in Beijing

Cancer Natural Solutions Q&R

Is ANYONE buying this anymore? (Netanyahu)

Mt Etna in Sicily Eupting

These Soviet 4x4 Sedans Are Cooler Than You Think!

SSRIs and School Shootings, FDA Corruption, and Why Everyone on Anti-Depressants Is Totally Unhappy

St. Louis Man Who Gunned Down Police Officer Demond Taylor Is Released on $5,000 Bond


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Rereading 'Our Enemy, the State'
Source: Mises Daily E-Mail
URL Source: http://mises.org/story/3614
Published: Aug 6, 2009
Author: Cecil Palmer
Post Date: 2009-08-06 14:59:05 by Original_Intent
Keywords: State, tyranny, totalitarianism, libertarianism
Views: 334
Comments: 13

Rereading Our Enemy, the State

Mises Daily by Cecil Palmer | Posted on 8/6/2009

For many more years than I now care to revive in my memory, I have publicly and privately proclaimed that there are at least three outstanding books in the English language which, if they had been read as widely and thoughtfully as they deserve to be, might have spared the world many of its present misfortunes. The books I have in mind are Milton's Areopagitica, Mill's On Liberty, and Spencer's Man versus the State.

The lamps of liberty are going out, one by one, throughout the whole world. Indeed, this widening darkness is the supreme human tragedy of the age in which we live. In our desire to flirt with knowledge, we have jilted wisdom. There is only one end to this illicit kissing of the ephemeral – a stubborn, stupid unwillingness to embrace the eternal. Moral rot is eating away the very roots of individualism, and thereby destroying the soul of man at the fearful price of granting secular exaltation to a soulless State.

From now onwards I, for one, intend to add a fourth book to the jeweled necklace of libertarian literature. Our Enemy, the State, by the late Albert Jay Nock, is given this high precedence in my humble estimation because it has in common with the classics I have mentioned, all those qualities of clear thinking, objective presentation and lucid exposition which distinguish the wise philosopher from the merely intellectual pamphleteer. The one writes for all eternity: the other for the moving moment that must inevitably pass away.

Superficially, one of the grimmest paradoxes of the twentieth century is the emergence of the atom bomb at a time when it is painfully evident that the overwhelming majority of mankind is afflicted with delayed adolescence. Substantially, however, it is not a paradox at all. May it not be that the universality of the adolescence and the splitting of the atom are patterned in the natural law of cause and effect? Is it unlikely that we have been inflicted with the super-scientific bomb because we have refused to grow up and because we have failed to cherish and honor the spiritual bounty of our inheritance?

Albert Jay Nock obviously absorbed every word of Herbert Spencer's masterpiece and, having done so, his own mighty pen began where Spencer left off. Nock's prescience is uncanny. Reading his book in this Year of Grace, 1952, it is difficult to realize that it was written in 1935. It reads like contemporary journalism, but with this tremendous difference: it is written in prose of such majesty and simple beauty that it will rank, for all time, as imperishable literature. Furthermore, it states a case against Statism that is as fearless and provocative as it is profound and unchallengeable.

The State, as Nock implies over and over again, is merely the politicians' dreams come true. It is political conjuring, whereby "all the people all the time" are invited to believe that the State and Government are one and the same thing. The truth is, of course, that whereas Government has its roots in society, the State is a parasitical, malignant growth that seeks to destroy society by bribery, corruption and compulsion.

Our Enemy, the State, as the very title emphasizes, warns every thinking man and woman to remember that the price of human liberty is eternal vigilance. It stresses, also, that liberty, unlike justice, is not a right. It is an attitude of mind, and a beatitude of the soul.

This very great book reminds us that the State is at once a myth and a terrible reality. It is a myth in the sense that it has no validity outside the twisted, crooked mentalities of totalitarians. It is also a reality in the sense that, whenever it is allowed to usurp the throne of Government, it not only commandeers the power that corrupts but, in order to give finality to its ascendancy, it must acquire for itself, and for itself alone, the absolute power that corrupts absolutely.

Albert Jay Nock made the point that history divorced from political economy is a story without background. The present writer ventures the assertion that political economy divorced from history is about as utilitarian as a teapot without a spout.

The great value of Nock's diagnosis of Statism, and all its implications, is that it establishes a pregnant matrimonial alliance between philosophical history and political science. We are able, therefore, to see the evolutions and revolutions of human understanding, and misunderstanding, in perspective.

In other words, the author enables us to contemplate objectively the State's progressive efforts to subjugate society. Statism is political ideology, seeking outlets in the body politic whereby it can subtly transmute social power into State power. Communism, socialism, fascism, and all the other left-wing ideological variations, are the outward and visible signs of this inward and secular infiltration.

Herbert Spencer invited his generation to recognize the natural antagonisms that must exist between man, as man, and the State, as master. Nock was able to extend and widen the invitation for his own day and generation. Much that Spencer conceived in creative and prophetic intuition, Nock saw with his own eyes as contemporary phenomena. But, like Spencer, he too reinforced his fine scholarship with intuitive "second sight" into the future.

It is impossible to read this burning, passionate essay on the State as tyrant without realizing that man himself is all too frequently his own worst enemy.

It would be bad enough if we merely admitted that man is in danger of selling his soul for a mess of political pottage, in terms of the so-called Welfare State. Unhappily, truth demands the unequivocal admission that man is, today, showing too many signs of his guilty willingness to give his soul away, in blind obedience to a State masquerading as Father Christmas.

I could wish that a thousand millionaires would pool their petty cash in support of a literary crusade dynamically inspired with the will and purpose to make this dead man's masterpiece a living monument in the land of his birth, and beyond. Our Enemy, the State should be in the hands, and in the minds, of the new and rising generation which is being so cleverly and so wickedly seduced by power-drunk State idolaters. It is a book which offers inspired guidance to those who have ventured off the known way, only to find themselves in a jungle of frustration and perplexity.

Above all, it is a sincere, honest, courageous and finely documented libertarian approach to the urgent spiritual, social and economic problems which beset us, and which mankind must resolve if declining civilization is to escape total eclipse.

[VIEW THIS ARTICLE ONLINE]


Cecil Palmer, noted British publisher, author, and lecturer, was a founder and executive officer of the Society of Individualists. His sudden death on January 18, 1952, came shortly before the publication of his book The British Socialist Illfare State. See his article archives. Comment on the blog.

This article was originally published as "Our Enemy, the State: A Re-Review" in The Freeman, February 25, 1952.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Original_Intent (#0)

"Prejudice is the bedrock of individuality."

Anti-racism is code for white genocide

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-08-06   16:26:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#1)

Prejudice is the bedrock of irrationality.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-08-06   16:45:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Original_Intent (#0)

Thanks for post, one of my all time favs.

Oppenheimer's "The State" is also excellent.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2009-08-06   16:48:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lysander_Spooner (#3)

"The State" is also excellent.

"Anthem" by Ayn Rand predicts our future.

sizzlerguy  posted on  2009-08-06   17:31:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Original_Intent (#2)

Prejudice is the bedrock of irrationality.

That would be the one point on which you disagree with Nock?

Anti-racism is code for white genocide

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-08-06   17:36:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Original_Intent (#0)

That the state is the enemy should be obvious from the nature of its initial origins. People became "citizens" of a state when criminal gangs rampaged through a territory, intimidating inhabitants into obedience and servitude by force of arms with the gang leader designating himself as king. Still going on today and the illegal Israeli state is the best current (despicable) example of this.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2009-08-07   1:20:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Original_Intent, prefrontal vortex (#2)

Prejudice is the bedrock of irrationality.

Dr. Walter Williams would disagree. Prejudice (freedom of choice or freedom to avoid those with whom one does not wish to associate) is an integral component of Liberty.

"Midway upon the journey of our life I found myself within a forest dark,
For the straightforward pathway had been lost." - Dante's Inferno

IndieTX  posted on  2009-08-07   1:24:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: IndieTX (#7)

Prejudice is the bedrock of irrationality.

Dr. Walter Williams would disagree. Prejudice (freedom of choice or freedom to avoid those with whom one does not wish to associate) is an integral component of Liberty.

Look at the definition of prejudice. I am not opposed to people holding their own opinions whether rational or irrational but I am careful in my use of words.

My Oxford New American Dictionary (Concise Edition on the Mac Dashboard) defines it thusly:

prejudice

noun


1. Preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.
related sub-definition: dislike, hostility, or unjust behavior formed on such a basis.

(Def. 2. is a legal definition that does not apply.)

So, while one might be free to be prejudiced doing so is not a rational choice.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-08-07   3:09:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Prefrontal Vortex, IndieTX (#5)

Prejudice is the bedrock of irrationality.

That would be the one point on which you disagree with Nock?

See my comment to Indie. I did not say one is not free to be prejudiced I said it was irrational, and irrational it is.

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-08-07   3:12:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Original_Intent, IndieTX (#9)

I did not say one is not free to be prejudiced I said it was irrational, and irrational it is.

Thomas Sowell would disagree, because it ignores knowledge costs. It is not irrational or unjust to be unwilling to pay knowledge costs.

Anti-racism is code for white genocide

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-08-07   9:02:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Original_Intent (#2) (Edited)

Prejudice is the bedrock of irrationality.

Can you think of any circumstances or situations where prejudice would be rational?

How about stereotyping?

How about racism? Can you think of any circumstances or situations where racism could be considered rational or, perhaps, prudent?

Think about a job as a pizza delivery person or cab driver in a high crime, crack infested type neighborhood with concomitant and rational precautions taken. Prejudicial? Stereotyping? Racist?

Consider your decision to take your sweetheart on a midnight stroll through one of these areas (some may consider this decision itself to be abjectly irrational). Would the decision to forgo the stroll or pick another area be irrational? Prejudicial? Stereotyping? Racist?

TRAITORS TO AMERICA AND BRAINWASHED IDIOTS SUPPORT AND DEFEND ISRAEL. TO HELL WITH ZIONISTS AND THIER AMERICAN FRONTS: AIPAC/PNAC/ADL/JPCA/NAACP/CFR/FEDERAL RESERVE/NWO/SPLC/JINSA/ACLU/FPI/CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS/AEI/FEDERAL MEDIA/HOLLYWOOD, et. al.

wbales  posted on  2009-08-07   10:01:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: sizzlerguy (#4) (Edited)

Yep, on my shelf. Hopefully not, but time will tell.

What replaces the dying Nation State, will be interesting, The USSA may dissolve quickly or perhaps the alure of so-called power will entice some to clutch on to this idiocy until finally it's tossed into the dustbin.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2009-08-07   11:08:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: wbales (#11) (Edited)

Would the decision to forgo the stroll or pick another area be irrational? Prejudicial? Stereotyping? Racist?

No, because liberals make the same choice.

Liberals don't care if you don't go into certain neighborhoods, because they don't.

They care if you refuse entry to your neighborhood to people from certain neighborhoods. That's not a choice liberals ever had to make, so they made it illegal. When it becomes unavoidable by other means, they either stop being liberals or stop breathing/breeding.

A typical anti-white like Ferret Mike won't strongly object to avoiding certain neighborhoods, but will strenuously object to whites excluding anybody else or having a place of their own.

But you can't really object to that and still reasonably claim to be indifferent. Ferret Mike is at least self-aware and fairly honest on this point.

Remember: Africa for blacks, Asia for Asians, white countries for EVERYBODY!

Anti-racism is code for white genocide

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-08-07   13:34:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]