See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Akridge Energy Buys 400 MW Free Energy Generator from BlackLight Power
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2009 ... idge-energy-hydrino-generator/
Published: Aug 10, 2009
Author: n
Post Date: 2009-08-10 19:32:34 by gengis gandhi
Keywords: None
Views: 321
Comments: 14
I know it may sound like science fiction, but if you remember we talked about BlackLight Power’s invention last year, you surely do remember it was about free energy. BlackLight’s hydrino (a hydrogen atom with a lower energy state than it was previously thought possible) stirred controversy in scientists’ world, bringing them bad fame as seekers of “free energy” and associating BlackLight Power with a scammer’s image. On July 30, BlackLight Power announced a commercial license agreement with Maryland-based Akridge Energy. BLP will allow Akridge to use their energy producing process for generating electricity in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Colombia, up to a maximum continuous capacity of 400 MW. “We believe BlackLight Power has developed a new energy technology that will have a profound impact on the environment and the economy and will help us achieve our goal in becoming a major, green-power producer in the greater-DC market,” said John E. Akridge III, chairman and owner of Akridge Energy. “We are excited to be one of the early-adopters of BLP’s energy technology .” Mr. Akridge is also a shareholder of BlackLight Power. The trust that Akridge Energy is giving BlackLight by investing in them should give the science community a reason to think more about hydrinos and accept newer physics concepts that, even if not fully understood and demonstrated, work. We’ll keep you updated with any other news about BlackLight’s evolution. Liked/disliked this article? Share your thoughts!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: christine (#0)
shift ahoy, existing power structure irrelevancy phase bump. dig it, baby.
if a people will not prosecute officials who subvert and violate the constitution, then the constitution has no authority over officials. Gengis Gandhi, Troubled Genius
hmmm. Scam?
"This is suspicious at best. Sounds like a bunch of nutty conspiracy theorists, or, as others have pointed out, a government program to find nutty conspiracy theorists who could be dangerous."
why? because it doesn't fit existing belief systems of 'science'? http://www.blacklightpower.com/ New Energy Source BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new primary energy source with applications to heating, distributed power generation, central power generation, and motive power. It is based on a new chemical process of releasing the latent energy of the hydrogen atom, the BlackLight Process. On October 20, 2008, BlackLight announced off-site validation of a 50 kW reactor. Rowan Scientists confirmed BLP's 1 kW and 50 kW power source tests corresponding to 20 kilojoules and 1.0 megajoules respectively. Chemical analysis of the reactant and product R-Ni powder could account for less than 1% of the observed energy from known chemistry. BlackLight's results have been published widely and replicated by independent groups.
if a people will not prosecute officials who subvert and violate the constitution, then the constitution has no authority over officials. Gengis Gandhi, Troubled Genius
Here's a schematic: At first glance it seems like the extra energy from the "H2" gas may be useful but the fuel seems like it will be a lot more important.
Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle
No, because the government would never, ever allow a technology to be released that would benefit the citizens.
theres things a lot bigger than the government.
if a people will not prosecute officials who subvert and violate the constitution, then the constitution has no authority over officials. Gengis Gandhi, Troubled Genius
Not according to Nikola Tesla and he knew more about energy than any person on the planet today and he died in 1943. We have Tesla to thank for wireless, robotics, AC power, radio, ignition systems, x-rays, induction motors and so much more. Tesla had patents for free energy dating back to 1901. The government confiscated all of his writings and work when he died, many patents have been sealed from public view. Anybody who has ever studied Tesla agrees that free energy is possible and certainly not a scam.
If it's cost competitive with conventional then it may be the paradigm shift that will reactivate the economy. Should "generate" some discussion on C2C.
When it works commercially, let me know.
"This is suspicious at best. Sounds like a bunch of nutty conspiracy theorists, or, as others have pointed out, a government program to find nutty conspiracy theorists who could be dangerous."
If the process generates enough electricity to split H2 off water then we should have a perpetual motion machine. Or am I missing something?
yes, I've placed that at the top of my list.
if a people will not prosecute officials who subvert and violate the constitution, then the constitution has no authority over officials. Gengis Gandhi, Troubled Genius
I wanna see it work.
"This is suspicious at best. Sounds like a bunch of nutty conspiracy theorists, or, as others have pointed out, a government program to find nutty conspiracy theorists who could be dangerous."
lol
"This is suspicious at best. Sounds like a bunch of nutty conspiracy theorists, or, as others have pointed out, a government program to find nutty conspiracy theorists who could be dangerous."
Not good enough. I wanna perpetual-motion device that goes faster and faster.... :-P
NO to Lisbon! I fear a YES verdict more than Swine Flu....
#2. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
#3. To: Clitora (#2)
#4. To: Clitora (#2)
#5. To: gengis gandhi (#3)
why? because it doesn't fit existing belief systems of 'science'?
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#6. To: Esso (#5)
#7. To: Clitora (#2)
Scam?
#8. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
#9. To: gengis gandhi (#3)
#10. To: Clitora (#9)
#11. To: Clitora (#9)
#12. To: Tatarewicz (#10)
If the process generates enough electricity to split H2 off water then we should have a perpetual motion machine. Or am I missing something?
#13. To: gengis gandhi (#11)
yes, I've placed that at the top of my list.
#14. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest