[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: The 'Second American Revolution' Has Begun
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general87/second.htm
Published: Aug 13, 2009
Author: Gerald Celente
Post Date: 2009-08-13 08:39:12 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 865
Comments: 83

KINGSTON, NY -- The natives are restless. The third shot of the "Second American Revolution" has been fired. History is being made. But just as with the first two shots, the third shot is not being heard.

America is seething. Not since the Civil War has anything like this happened. But the protests are either being intentionally downplayed or ignorantly misinterpreted.

The first shot was fired on April 15, 2009. Over 700 anti-tax rallies and "Tea Parties" erupted nationwide. Rather than acknowledge their significance, the general media either ignored or ridiculed both protests and protestors, playing on "tea bagging" for its sexual innuendo.

Initially President Obama said he was unaware of the tea parties. The White House later warned they could "mutate" into something "unhealthy."

Shot #2 was fired on the Fourth of July, when throngs of citizens across the nation gathered to again protest "taxation without representation." And as before, the demonstrations were branded right-wing mischief and dismissed.

The third volley, fired in early August, was aimed point blank at Senators and House members pitching President Obama's health care reform package to constituents. In fiery town hall meetings, enraged citizens shouted down their elected representatives. It took a strong police presence and/or burly bodyguards to preserve a safe physical space between the politicians and irate townspeople.

The White House and the media have labeled protestors "conservative fringe elements," or as players in staged events organized by Republican operatives that have been egged on by Fox news and right-wing radio show hosts.

In regard to this latest wave of outbursts, health industry interests opposed to any reform are also being blamed for inciting the public. But organized or spontaneous is not the issue. While most protestors exhibit little grasp of the complex 1000 page health care reform document (that nary a legislator has read either), their emotion is clearly real and un-staged.

Rightly or wrongly, the legislation is regarded as yet another straw on the already overloaded camel's back. A series of gigantic, unpopular government-imposed (but taxpayer-financed) bailouts, buyouts, rescue and stimulus packages have been stuffed down the gullet of Americans. With no public platform to voice their opposition, options for citizens have been limited to fruitless petitions, e-mails and phone calls to Congress all fielded by anonymous staff underlings.

Now, with Congress in recess and elected representatives less than a stone's throw away, the public is exploding. The devil is not in the details of the heath care reform, the devil is the government mandating health care. Regardless of how the plan is pitched or what is being promised, to the public the legislation is yet another instance of big government taking another piece out of their lives and making them pay for it; again telling them what they can or cannot do.

Though in its early stages, the "Second American Revolution" is underway. Yet, what we forecast will become the most profound political trend of the century ­ the trend that will change the world ­ is still invisible to the same experts, authorities and pundits who didn't see the financial crisis coming until the bottom fell out of the economy.

Trend Forecast: Conditions will continue to deteriorate. The global economy is terminally ill. The recession is in a brief remission, not the early stages of recovery. Cheap money, easy credit and unrestrained borrowing brought on an economic crisis that cannot be cured by monetary and fiscal policies that promote more cheap money, easy credit and unrestrained borrowing.

Nevertheless, Washington will continue to intervene, tax and exert control. Protests will escalate and riots will follow.

Fourth Shot of the "Second American Revolution": While there are many wild cards that could light the fuse, The Trends Research Institute forecasts that if the threat of government-forced Swine Flu vaccinations is realized, it will be the fourth shot. Tens of millions will fight for their right to remain free and unvaccinated.

Publisher's Note: The power of the Internet and new technologies is inexorably fermenting the "Second American Revolution." However widespread and emotionally charged, had the tax rallies, tea parties and healthcare reform protests occurred in years past, they might have been covered by the local media, but might not have made national headline news and thus would have died stillborn.

Now, with the ubiquitous camera-equipped cell phone, universal access to YouTube, and millions of twitters and tweets, the uprisings cannot be ignored, contained, managed, spun or edited down. The revolutionary fervor will prove contagious.

Can anything stop it?

Trend Forecast: Before the momentum of the "Second American Revolution" becomes unstoppable, it could be derailed through some false flag event designed to deceive the public, or a genuine event or crisis capable of rallying the entire nation behind the President. In a worst-case scenario, according to Trends Research Institute Director, Gerald Celente, "Given the pattern of governments to parlay egregious failures into mega-failures, the classic trend they follow, when all else fails, is to take their nation to war."

A false flag attempt, a genuine crisis, or a declaration of war, may slow the momentum of the "Second American Revolution," but nothing will stop it.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 43.

#6. To: Horse (#0)

The Second Amernment is going to lose in this debate. Your guy in New Hampshire didn't do it any favors.

war  posted on  2009-08-13   10:03:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: war, PaulCJ (#6)

The Second Amernment is going to lose in this debate. Your guy in New Hampshire didn't do it any favors.

You demonstrate that the Second remains an accurate litmus for statist liberals.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-08-13   11:18:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: TooConservative (#11)

You demonstrate that the Second remains an accurate litmus for statist liberals.

Nope. I demonstrate how the swell of public sentiment is moving against "...my cold dead fingers..."

Story warned the republic that keeping and bearing were contigent upon regulation and DISCIPLNE and that ignoring this would imperil the "right".

Someone else - not sure who - once observed that "the Bill of Rights are just amendments" implying they could be repealed and repealed they can be and while I may not agree with the implied threat behind that observation I can tell you that I fear it.

war  posted on  2009-08-13   11:50:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: war (#13)

Someone else - not sure who - once observed that "the Bill of Rights are just amendments" implying they could be repealed and repealed they can be and while I may not agree with the implied threat behind that observation I can tell you that I fear it.

No, the Bill of Rights were those guarantees which were required by the states before they would ratify the Constitution.

They rank above any other amendments legally and the Constitution itself loses a substantial portion of its own legitimacy.

The Constitution has no legal moorings without the Bill of Rights. And you have no rights with it.

And you sure sound like someone who desires the repeal of the Second.

TooConservative  posted on  2009-08-13   13:55:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: TooConservative (#26)

No, the Bill of Rights were those guarantees which were required by the states before they would ratify the Constitution.

They rank above any other amendments legally and the Constitution itself loses a substantial portion of its own legitimacy.

The Constitution has no legal moorings without the Bill of Rights. And you have no rights with it.

And you sure sound like someone who desires the repeal of the Second.

While repealing the bill of rights would be a slap in the face to Americas legacy, it is possible to repeal them legally. No part of the constitution is uneditable. The first amendment could be repealed as easily as the inauguration was change from march to January, legally speaking.

Rhino369  posted on  2009-08-13   14:46:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Rhino369 (#30)

Which would affect our rights in no way whatsoever. We'd simply have to guarantee them ourselves as individuals. We'd still, however, continue to hold those rights. They're inalienable, you see. :)

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-08-13   14:49:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: SonOfLiberty (#32)

Which would affect our rights in no way whatsoever. We'd simply have to guarantee them ourselves as individuals. We'd still, however, continue to hold those rights. They're inalienable, you see. :)

They rather clearly are not inalienable. Nature doesn't care about you or your rights. In fact it doesn't care about anything, nor can it care.

Rhino369  posted on  2009-08-13   14:52:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Rhino369, SonOfLiberty (#34)

Nature doesn't care about you or your rights. In fact it doesn't care about anything, nor can it care.

If not from nature or programmed by God, from whom or what do you derive your "moral code"? Who should define "good"? "Evil"? "Right or wrong"?

OR, does "Might = Right"? IS peace "logical," Spock? Afterall, according to The Church of Darwin, no one deserves to live but the strongest.

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-13   15:11:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: F16Fighter (#38)

If not from nature or programmed by God, from whom or what do you derive your "moral code"?

The human mind. Very clearly you do as well since you probably don't support the slavery or child murder the Abraham god sanctions.

Who should define "good"? "Evil"? "Right or wrong"?

Good and evil, right and wrong are person opinions just as beautiful and ugly.

OR, does "Might = Right"?

In my opinion no. In yours yes, because your view of morality is based upon what you think a God would punish you for.

IS peace "logical," Spock?

No, peace is not always logical. And morality is never purely logical, because it always requires a subjective starting point as an axiom. Though logic should be used to construct moral codes from subjective starting points. For example valuing human life isn't logical, it is a feeling. From there we can say murder is wrong in most cases since it takes away human life.

Afterall, according to The Church of Darwin, no one deserves to live but the strongest.

How ignorant are you? Aside from your childish name for a scientific field of study, you make an extremely inaccurate claim about it. Anyone who thinks evolution says the strongest deserve to live, doesn't understand evolution in even the most basic level.

The most adapted to their environment survive. That is a fact, not an opinion. And you can't get from is to aught.

Rhino369  posted on  2009-08-13   15:19:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 43.

        There are no replies to Comment # 43.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 43.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]