[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Many Gun Owners, the State and Media Agree; 2a Is No Longer Relevant
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/gaddy/gaddy67.1.html
Published: Aug 14, 2009
Author: Michael Gaddy
Post Date: 2009-08-14 07:02:02 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 1108
Comments: 80

As a government grows more and more intrusive on individual liberties, that government’s fear of the armed citizen increases exponentially, just as an armed robber fears a well-armed potential victim. Here in America in the last seventy plus years, our government and their stooges in the media have sought to relegate the right of a free people to keep and bear arms into a privilege, subject to government approval, rather than an inalienable right. Sadly, many gun owners have agreed to participate in this madness.

I have been consistent in my objections to asking permission and paying for the privilege to carry a weapon on my person, if and when I chose to do so. Yet, the majority of objections I receive to my position come from people who currently own guns and have jumped at the opportunity for government approval to do what they already have the right to do. Is this not an open acknowledgement to those in power the Second Amendment, and the remainder of the Bill of Rights, mean nothing and are subject to the whim of some elected criminal, bureaucrat, or an agenda wearing a black robe?

When I decided to write this article, I did not contact the government, submit to a background check, submit fingerprints, take a government endorsed writing class and pay for permission. What is the difference in the exercise of my inalienable right to free speech and my inalienable right to keep and bear arms? The difference is: the state currently fears my ability to resist tyranny with a firearm more than with words, but as we can see from the reaction of the government and its media lackeys to the spoken objections to the tyranny of socialized medicine, that is about to change.

In today’s political climate, if one dares to speak out about the intrusion of the state into every crevice of liberty and freedom, they are compared by the socialist mouth organ to Nazis, Hamas and Hezbollah.

If the First Amendment rights follow the pattern of the Second Amendment, only those who have been vetted by the state will be allowed to speak or write publicly, and then only after passing the prerequisite courses, state scrutiny, and of course, pay the required amount for the privilege.

I can see the stooges proudly proclaiming their newly paid-for right to speak and write, just as they do now with their permits to carry a concealed weapon. Then, many will lobby for reciprocity from other states the right to speak or publish, or perhaps even campaign for a national permit to exercise their First Amendment rights.

An American, exercising his inalienable right to keep and bear arms, recently became the focus of the state and the media in New Hampshire near where Obama was to appear. Chris Matthews and other members of the propaganda ministry were apoplectic. How dare anyone other than a government bottom feeder be allowed near the Messiah with a firearm? What would have happened had this man decided to exercise his First Amendment rights at the same time he was exercising his Second?

What did the state and the media fear most about this man with a gun? Was it the man, the gun, the spirit of the man, or perhaps it might have been his ethnicity? After all, according to the media, if he were there to object to the socialist plans of Obama that would reveal his latent racism. We all know, white people concerned about government taking over their health care want to shoot anyone who is only half white.

What a masterstroke it was for the state to get Boobus to admit the only rights he has are those subject to the "reasonable" restrictions of his masters. The precedent has been set and we have agreed; you must submit yourself before the god called government, pass their background checks, take their approved qualification course, submit the required monies and wait for your ID card certifying you have permission from the state to exercise at least one of your former inalienable rights!

If you, and/or a member of your family, are assaulted by a madman with a weapon while in a restaurant, on a school campus, in church, at the mall, in a bank, in the parking lot where you shop or work, in a carjacking or a mugging, or visiting Obama’s home town, you must remember, the only people allowed to defend their lives and those of their loved ones are those who have been sanctioned by the state to do so. That is freedom in America today, granted by the state, bought and paid for.

Through our inactions and apathy we have acknowledged the state to be the masters of our lives; perhaps we can apply for the privilege of having our own health care, the right not to be forcibly injected by some vaccine whose side effects are worse than the disease or the right not to be imprisoned in a FEMA camp. Remember, we traded our rights for security. It is turning out to be one heck of a bad bargain.

Resistance, anyone?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 73.

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Right on.

I've NEVER advocated going for a concealed carry "permit". Permit being short for permission. Since keeping AND BEARING arms is a RIGHT, the need to seek permission from government is null and void. If you, or me, or anybody feels a need to pack heat, then we have the right to do so without government permission. It's that simple.

The author makes a point I've been preaching for years. About time somebody else figured it out.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-08-14   8:31:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: SonOfLiberty (#1)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2009-08-14   8:59:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Eric Stratton (#3)

I agree, but the problem is that the FedGov and StateGovs take their laws too seriously. LOL

At this point in time in history, I no longer care.

I just don't.

Me, you, all of us, are already guilty of so many crimes we don't even know about, what is one more added to the pile that they could potentially charge any of us with at any time?

I mean seriously. When we are afraid to exercise a right without permission, then it's time to reassess reality and to defy the authority that demands permission.

They play seriously, no doubt. So should we.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-08-14   9:03:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: SonOfLiberty (#4)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2009-08-14   9:39:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Eric Stratton (#5)

I honestly and truly believe that the time has passed for us to continue to justify being meek and submissive. We have to stop being afraid of asserting our rights, openly and boldly. The job now is to convince others that this is the case, IMO. There will be no other time in what's left of our country's life where we'll have such a sympathetic audience, or the means to get the word out.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-08-14   9:43:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: SonOfLiberty (#6)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2009-08-14   9:45:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Eric Stratton (#7)

No question. But it has to start with somebody. That guy in NH that they couldn't find a reason to nail to the wall for exercising his 2a right is a good place to look for an example of how to do this. He made perfect arguments about this very thing. More of us need to get out and start this movement rolling faster.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-08-14   9:49:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: SonOfLiberty (#8)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2009-08-14   9:55:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Eric Stratton (#13)

It's one of the articles on this very forum. Some radio sneering head was laying into him on a youtube video, and he remained calm. It was, I think, 2 days ago-ish?

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-08-14   9:58:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: SonOfLiberty (#14)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2009-08-14   10:26:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Eric Stratton (#31)

I have on a number of occasions, mostly at LP, seen people post about how they simply don't pay any income taxes b/c it's unConstitutional.

Upon my asking, I have yet to get one response asking how they do it, whether it's simply not filling out the forms, or by an objection letter, or whatever. They just say it an then never answer back.

I'd be interested, but I'm not going to be society's ginea pig either since I know several people personally that have served prison time for not partaking of the program. It's kinda like being "dead right" in a traffic accident.

It's simple. If you're self employed, ya just don't file. The IRS doesn't get you until you file again. What gets you flagged is when you haven't filed in a number of years and then you suddenly file, f'rinstance, if you get married and start filing jointly. They'll notice you're not on their records and they'll go back 3 years and check for 10-99s under your name-ss#.

Obnoxicated  posted on  2009-08-14   14:14:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Obnoxicated (#57)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2009-08-14   18:08:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Eric Stratton (#58)

Again, you tried this?

Do you know anyone that's tried this and it's worked?

I know at least one person that did just that and ended up serving 18 months. Yeah, it took a number of years for it to catch up, but they got him.

Eric,

You ask very good questions.

There are meaningful answers. Unfortunately, I'm struggling hard to stay awake as I type this. I'll come back to this tomorrow.

SCPO Blackshoe Retired  posted on  2009-08-25   3:02:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: SCPO Blackshoe Retired (#66)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2009-08-25   8:47:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Eric Stratton (#69)

It's simple. If you're self employed, ya just don't file. The IRS doesn't get you until you file again. What gets you flagged is when you haven't filed in a number of years and then you suddenly file...

The 'income tax' in the U.S. is literally shrouded in 'mystery' because those who developed it (Those behind the New Deal, the Internal Revenue Code and the 'new' system of taxation for the U.S.) desire it to be so. If you've ever tried reading the Internal Revenue Code, and every American should at least once, you'll come away from your effort very much confused. It has been made very large, very difficult (some have said impossible) to understand, and further obfuscated by an enormous array of forms.

It's really no wonder that the average TAXPAYER accepts the FORM 1040 that is mailed out and, out of fear and ignorance, does as 'everyone else' seems to do.

The 'New System of Taxation' came into existence with the 'New Deal' and the Social Security Act of 1935. In order to realize the benefit of the Old Age Pension it became necessary for the American Citizen to apply for the Social Security Account and to be issued the Card bearing the NAME and NUMBER of the ACCOUNT which the Citizen then 'signed.'

What was not revealed regarding this 'contract' was that the ACCOUNT with its NAME and NUMBER was a LEGAL PERSON (in the same sense that a CORPORATION is a PERSON) which came to be later called a TAXPAYER.

By signing the CARD the American Citizen agreed to 'activate' that LEGAL PERSON by 'acting' in the position of TRUSTEE in order to 'lend' to the LEGAL PERSON consciousness and physical ability. The American Citizen would also 'act' as the FIDUCIARY for the LEGAL PERSON in order to manage its Financial and Business Affairs. Note carefully: The American Citizen is NOT the CONTRACT CREATED SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT TAXPAYER LEGAL PERSON. The American Citizen merely 'fills the positions' of TRUSTEE and FIDUCIARY for the LEGAL PERSON in order to 'lend' it 'life.'

As Designated Trustee for the LEGAL TRUST PERSON the American Citizen is able to enjoy certain 'immunities' provided for in LAW.

Mistake Number One that the People make is that they 'assume' that They are the CREATED LEGAL PERSON and so 'act' accordingly. Seeing this 'error' the LEGAL SYSTEM and the COURTS eagerly take advantage of this 'ignorance' and thereby deprive the confused American Citizen of the RIGHTS and IMMUNITIES provided for in LAW.

The Sovereign American Citizen of the Declaration and the Bill of Rights has not been 'done away with.' The Sovereign American Citizen in a confused state however, may 'voluntarily' take on the STATUS of the CREATED LEGAL TRUST PERSON as their own and thereby 'waive' the Rights and Immunities provided for in Law. Confusing one's own self for the CREATED LEGAL TRUST PERSON results in unwittingly assuming all RESPONSIBILITIES and OBLIGATIONS of the CREATED LEGAL PERSON and being held liable for all subsequent PENALTIES, FINES, INCARCERATION or other 'justice' imposed by the LEGAL SYSTEM and the COURTS.

Mistake Number Two is to 'assume' that the LEGAL PERSON TAXPAYER is 'required' to utilized Form 1040 in order to fulfill the TAXPAYER'S obligation to 'file' an Annual Report of Income. In so doing, the TAXPAYER PERSON is obligating ITSELF to the 1040 TAX. Is anyone able to find the 1040 TAX anywhere in the Internal Revenue Code?

The COURTS have already ruled that the 'use of Form 1040' is not required by the Code. What is required of the TAXPAYER is to 'submit the annual report of income' by whatever means the TAXPAYER PERSON deems best. In fact, the Courts have added, the TAXPAYER PERSON may use a Form of ITS OWN making rather than any particular Federal Tax Form.

The income tax 'problem' is truly a 'lack of understanding.' Of course, the Federal Government hasn't openly revealed these truths (wanting instead to capitalize on the 'fear' and 'ignorance' of the people) but will 'acknowledge' these truths (never published) within the LEGAL SYSTEM and its COURTS.

There is much to learn and verify and an excellent place to begin is reading the web pages at TeamLaw.org. Take advantage of the articles on those pages which are available freely for your own research. Then continue the research where-ever it leads to finally 'see' what has been done and how we've unwittingly given our support.

(http://www.teamlaw.org/)

Once one is able to discern what 'the law' really means, who it applies to, and how to properly 'activate' the CREATED SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT TAXPAYER PERSON to best advantage, the SYSTEM becomes far less burdensome.

All that one needs to learn and verify is freely available.

Sorry to take so long getting back to this Eric; a couple of 'priority' items needed tending to for maintenance of 'marital bliss.'

SCPO Blackshoe Retired  posted on  2009-08-27   22:23:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: SCPO Blackshoe Retired (#72)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2009-08-28   9:04:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 73.

#74. To: Eric Stratton (#73) (Edited)

If every single argument the anti-income-legalists made were true, and I'm not suggesting that some of them might not be actually factually and legally true, that doesn't alter the fact that if you don't "voluntarily comply", the government will take your home and auction it off, and throw you in jail at the point of a gun.

The law means nothing to these people. Not one damned thing. The legalists are somehow under the impression that if they just make that one grand case before a judge, he'll throw up his hands and say "gosh, how could we have missed that part, sorry, you're free to go and you don't have to pay income tax any longer".

It doesn't work that way. The law is there only to make people feel better about being raped by thugs and goons. It serves no other purpose.

In short, if you're going to not pay income tax (or any other tax), do it on principle alone and good luck to you. Don't think however that you stand a snowball's chance in hell in a court of law run by the government you're not paying taxes to.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-08-28 09:21:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 73.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]