In the article http://www.rense.com:80/general87/reality.htm a complete takeover of America is described. I have never disagreed with anything Kirwan has written until now. I don't blame him for what he's quoting, but I do blame the sources for fabricating this. This is scare-mongering and it's happened before. And often government sources for this kind of material is never fully available. Even if there is such a plan, it may only have been written as a contingency plan, and the person quoting it has expanded it completely out of control. Alex Jones is well-noted for his fear-mongering and sensationalism on his radio show and website, without providing solutions to problems he presents. When he's been confronted by that with callers, he immediately resorts to the excuse "I only report the news" to get out of it.
We need to consider that such a move to takeover America would easily require more than a million troops to pull it off, and even more to secure every city, town and village in America. I once calculated awhile back that if the entire military was mobilized on the ground, the most the military could have in place would be about one or two soldiers per square mile all across America. This is hardly enough to secure America, whereas in cities they would need hundreds of soldiers per square mile or even more.
We have most of our entire military engaged in Iraq, which is about the size of the state of Texas. The Iraq war was never completely resolved and now we're pulling out of it, albeit slowly. America is many times the size of Texas, and the American people as a whole are heavily armed as well.
A military take-over of America just isn't realistic. We need to ask ourselves, "WHY would a foreign power want to be involved in such a takeover?
Why would any other country care to participate?
What would another country get out of it?
Are there countries in the world where foreign troops are assisting a government take-over like?
And if so,for what purpose?
If the country is placed under martial law and the economy is destroyed, what purpose will that serve?
Surely the NWO already knows it's far easier (and cheaper, since everything always comes down to the buck) to change laws and policies in subtle ways as it is now than to collapse the economy and start over. The UK is a great example of this. In the article's Red Dawn like scenario, a military action would only breed contempt and create independent counter-revolutionaries, that would cause "insurgent" fighting to go on for decades.
I think all of these factors need to be considered when serious talk of a military takeover is considered.
tedtw@frontiernet.net