[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: The Pentagon Wants Authority to Post Almost 400,000 Military Personnel in U.S.
Source: http://www.progressive.org/wx081209b.html
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 15, 2009
Author: Matthew Rothschild
Post Date: 2009-08-15 16:50:02 by Freedomsnotfree
Keywords: None
Views: 1852
Comments: 68

The Pentagon Wants Authority to Post Almost 400,000 Military Personnel in U.S. By Matthew Rothschild, August 12, 2009

The Pentagon has approached Congress to grant the Secretary of Defense the authority to post almost 400,000 military personnel throughout the United States in times of emergency or a major disaster.

This request has already occasioned a dispute with the nation’s governors. And it raises the prospect of U.S. military personnel patrolling the streets of the United States, in conflict with the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878.

In June, the U.S. Northern Command distributed a “Congressional Fact Sheet” entitled “Legislative Proposal for Activation of Federal Reserve Forces for Disasters.” That proposal would amend current law, thereby “authorizing the Secretary of Defense to order any unit or member of the Army Reserve, Air Force Reserve, Navy Reserve, and the Marine Corps Reserve, to active duty for a major disaster or emergency.”

Taken together, these reserve units would amount to “more than 379,000 military personnel in thousands of communities across the United States,” explained

Paul Stockton, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and America’s Security Affairs, in a letter to the National Governors Association, dated July 20.

The governors were not happy about this proposal, since they want to maintain control of their own National Guard forces, as well as military personnel acting in a domestic capacity in their states.

“We are concerned that the legislative proposal you discuss in your letter would invite confusion on critical command and control issues,” Governor James H. Douglas of Vermont and Governor Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, the president and vice president of the governors’ association, wrote in a letter back to Stockton on August 7. The governors asserted that they “must have tactical control over all . . . active duty and reserve military forces engaged in domestic operations within the governor’s state or territory.”

According to Pentagon public affairs officer Lt. Col. Almarah K. Belk, Stockton has not responded formally to the governors but understands their concerns.

“There is a rub there,” she said. “If the Secretary calls up the reserve personnel to provide support in a state and retains command and control of those forces, the governors are concerned about if I have command and control of the Guard, how do we ensure unity of effort and everyone is communicating and not running over each other.”

more at link

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#1. To: Freedomsnotfree (#0)

If that means pulling troops back from the foreign countries they have no business being in, then I'm alright with this. Then we can begin working on replacing our over-sized standing army with a Switzerland-type military in which we are ALL bonafide members of the militia, even in the eyes of the scum who claim that the 2A doesn't apply to individuals. This would knock out two birds with one stone.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2009-08-15   16:54:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Hayek Fan, original_intent, psusa (#1)

If that means pulling troops back from the foreign countries they have no business being in, then I'm alright with this. Then we can begin...

You're falling into a common trap. You're limiting yourself to two choices, and giving in rhetorically because it's "the lesser of two evils," when there is are more choices to be had - including the more likely one that wasn't mentioned: Barry will keep the troops overseas and turn us into a giant concentration camp. But did you see how you gave in to it by rationalizing something that wasn't true? These are the things you have to be aware of with psyops. Regardless of any fictional trade-off, this defies every legal and ethical rule in the book and rational people should be outraged at it. This is what desensitization has done. It's made people tend to give up and give in to obscenity whether it be social engineering by the electronic jew via hollywood or tactical engineering by TheStateInc.

IndieTX  posted on  2009-08-15   17:31:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: IndieTX (#3)

You're falling into a common trap. You're limiting yourself to two choices, and giving in rhetorically because it's "the lesser of two evils," when there is are more choices to be had - including the more likely one that wasn't mentioned: Barry will keep the troops overseas and turn us into a giant concentration camp. But did you see how you gave in to it by rationalizing something that wasn't true? These are the things you have to be aware of with psyops. Regardless of any fictional trade-off, this defies every legal and ethical rule in the book and rational people should be outraged at it. This is what desensitization has done. It's made people tend to give up and give in to obscenity whether it be social engineering by the electronic jew via hollywood or tactical engineering by TheStateInc.

I don't know what you are talking about. I said nothing about the lessor of two evils. Nor do I know what you are talking about when you say that I am rationalizing something that isn't true. What's not true? It is a fact that we have troops spread across the world that have no business being there. Bring them home.

I'm afraid I do not know exactly where you are coming from.

including the more likely one that wasn't mentioned: Barry will keep the troops overseas and turn us into a giant concentration camp.

So you believe that 400,000 Americans will rush to join a domestic military? I don't see it happening.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2009-08-15   17:44:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Hayek Fan (#6)

400,000 Americans will rush to join a domestic military?

Of course they will, it will be open season for them to bash citizens heads and get on youtube.

sizzlerguy  posted on  2009-08-15   17:49:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: sizzlerguy (#7)

400,000 Americans will rush to join a domestic military?

Of course they will, it will be open season for them to bash citizens heads and get on youtube.

Then those 400,000 Americans will be killed by the 60,000,000 gun owners who won't put up with this kind of bullshit.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2009-08-15   17:54:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#11. To: Hayek Fan (#8)

60,000,000 gun owners

The whole idea of troops on US streets is to provoke violence. So, when that violence erupts, those troops can justifiy taking prisoners to the camps.

sizzlerguy  posted on  2009-08-15 17:57:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]