[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

"Gestapo" Müller - Hunting Hitler's Secret Police Chief

How Michelle Obama Could Become Democrats' Nominee after Biden's Terrible Debate, with Steve Bannon

Was This Lethal Spitfire Ace Killed by His Own Tactics?

Welsh Police Pay Home Visit To Man For Displaying Reform UK Political Sign

Liz Harrington Drops a BOMBSHELL on How Georgia Was Stolen

Trudeau govt to make all bathrooms in Parliament buildings GENDER NEUTRAL

French official admits censorship is needed for government to control public opinion

Bill Maher Predicts Trump Victory: The Left Is Aggressively Anti-Common Sense

Google is suppressing Blaze Media. Heres how you can help.

Large-scale prisons being secretly erected in all 50 states will they be used to house illegals or force Americans into concentration camps?

Hezbollah is ready to confront Israels military, with Jon Elmer

Balloons Land in Southern Lebanon, Warning Locals the Land Belongs to Jews

German Politician Hit With Hate Crime Investigation For Demanding Migrant Criminals Be Deported

DNC Caught Funneling Millions to Law Firms Involved in Unprecedented Lawfare Campaign Against Trump

Here Are The 20 Biggest Whoppers Biden Told During His Debate With Trump

NYC to ban cellphones in public schools.

New York Times Columnists Turn On Biden After Disastrous Debate Performance

8 Armed Men With Venezuelan Accents Violently Rob Denver Jewelry Store

Uvalde Police School Chief Indicted, Arrested Over Response To 2022 Shooting

Greetings from the Horse

Tonight confirmed every Democrats worst fear.

Five Women Soon To Die In 1928

How Trump Can Lose The Debate

Tucker Carlson Savagely Dismantles ‘Dumb’ and ‘Stupid’ Far-Left Reporter at Australian Freedom Conference

James Clapper, Mr. October Surprise: How Obama's Intel Czar Rigged 2016 And 2020 Debates Against Trump

Biden Campaign Balks Wont Commit to Drug Test

S-500 Prometheus: Designed To Kill Stealth Jets, ICBMs

The US military chases shiny new things and the ranks suffer

USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Now in the Med, USS Theodore Roosevelt Heads to the Middle East

Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi mocks Democrat judge acting like a ‘confused simpleton’


Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: Orly Taitz: Obama policies are 'clear and present danger to Israel'
Source: haaretz
URL Source: http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1108110.html
Published: Aug 18, 2009
Author: Benjamin L. Hartman
Post Date: 2009-08-18 01:07:40 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 975
Comments: 74

Orly Taitz: Obama policies are 'clear and present danger to Israel'

By Benjamin L. Hartman, Haaretz Correspondent, and The Associated Press

Tags: Israel News, birthers The driving force behind the 'birther' movement has found her star is rising in Israel. U.S. President Barack Obama's domestic and foreign policies pose "a clear and present danger to Israel," says the driving force behind the campaign to prove Obama was not born in the United States and therefore ineligible to serve as president.

The so-called "birther" movement that alleges that Obama was born in Kenya found fertile ground for publicity during the perennially slow news days of late July and early August. As cable and online news outlets devoted more and more time to the phenomenon, Israeli-American activist Orly Taitz emerged at the forefront of the campaign, and her star steadily rose until a fateful MSNBC interview in which she referred to her detractors as "Obama's brownshirts."

Last month, state officials in Hawaii said they have once again checked and confirmed that Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen, and therefore meets a key constitutional requirement for being president. Speaking to Haaretz on Monday, Taitz slammed what she calls Obama's support for Hamas, citing an executive order signed by the U.S. president shortly after taking office, which funneled $900 million to the Gaza Strip. To Taitz, the executive order was a form of political subterfuge meant to prop up the enemies of the United States and Israel, in spite of widespread American Jewish support for the new president.

"During the campaign, Obama was telling American Jews that he is for Israel... but sure enough, just as he was elected, look at his first actions, he issued an executive order to give $900 million to Gaza with no preconditions."

Taitz says that the money given to Hamas, which "has declared war on Israel and the United States," will not be used to help the people of the Gaza Strip but rather to build Qassam rockets, posing a serious threat to the State of Israel.

She believes Obama poses a threat to Israel not only because of his support of radical Islamic groups such as Hamas, but also because of his "radical socialist" policies, that will bring the United States to "totalitarianism and Stalinism." According to Taitz, these policies "pose a threat to all democracies, not only Israel."

Since her explosive MSNBC appearance, the "birther" movement has largely faded, supplanted by the health care debate and a new, more-vocal stream of detractors swarming the town hall meetings on health care, leaving Taitz and her movement as yesterday's news; outside of Israel that is.

Over the last two weeks, Taitz has been featured in a segment on Channel 10 television's popular nightly news show "London and Kirschenbaum," filmed a segment for the far-right Arutz 7 Web site and recorded a show for their radio channel, was featured in a three-page article in mass circulation daily Ma'ariv, and was the subject of a feature on Channel 1 TV.

Israel's Russian press has also taken notice, and interviewed Taitz for a feature for Russian radio and Israel's Russian-language Channel 9. Taitz will also be the subject of a lengthy article in "Vesty," Israel's largest Russian-language newspaper.

When asked if her reception has been more positive in Israel, the polyglot Taitz (she speaks English, Russian, Hebrew, Romanian, and Spanish) said in both the United States and Israel she has been met by widespread support, albeit most of it expressed privately.

"I think the vast majority of the population [in Israel] is supportive. There are some leftists, and some people in the media who are pro-Obama, but even they in private will say they're with me."

In Israel on a month-long vacation to celebrate her parents' 50th wedding anniversary, Taitz has watched from afar as the "birther" phenomenon gained steam in the United States, only to be largely supplanted by the debate over health care.

While on vacation, Taitz took her family to pay a visit to her native Moldova, where they saw where she grew up as well as the cemetery that houses some of her ancestors. Taitz spoke of how her grandmother witnessed the famous Kishniev pogrom of 1903, where 43 Jews were slaughtered and dozens wounded.

Taitz found motivation in this kernel of family history, saying that "the women and children murdered and the houses ransacked" during the pogrom have proved to her "why it's important for citizens to have their second amendment right to bear arms."

Taitz, who argues that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is building internment camps for "anti-Obama dissidents," said that on the road in the United States "people have shown me they want to have guns so they aren't rounded up into FEMA camps," a scenario which she says the Obama administration is planning.

Taitz's recent brush with fame and Google infamy (she says for a short period of time last month she and the birther movement placed in the top two of Google queries behind Obama himself) seem to have inspired her to campaign against a series of threats she feels are facing the United States, from FEMA-run interment camps for dissidents to Venezuela President Hugo Chavez's bulk investment in voting machines in Obama's hometown, Illinois. Taitz sees as no coincidence in these events.

In a classic, Americana twist, the matriarch of the birthers has not ruled out her own stint in politics. "You know I never ran for office, but I would not exclude this as a possibility."

Of course, she knows that the highest office of all is not an option. "I wasn't born in the United States, so I can't run for president."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 58.

#4. To: abraxas (#0)

Taitz's recent brush with fame and Google infamy (she says for a short period of time last month she and the birther movement placed in the top two of Google queries behind Obama himself) seem to have inspired her to campaign against a series of threats she feels are facing the United States, from FEMA-run interment camps for dissidents to Venezuela President Hugo Chavez's bulk investment in voting machines in Obama's hometown, Illinois.

Wait till she discovers the conspiracy of fluoridated water.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-08-18   11:18:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#4)

Wait till she discovers the conspiracy of fluoridated water.

Wait till America discovers the strain of black nationalism Obama has in his veins. But that wouldn't bother white guilters, eh?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-18   12:45:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jethro Tull (#7)

But that wouldn't bother white guilters, eh?

I wouldn't know about that.

I do know that Orly is a complete crackpot and incompetent lawyer.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-08-18   13:53:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#8)

I wouldn't know about that.

You would have fooled me.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-18   14:01:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jethro Tull (#11)

You would have fooled me.

Just because one isn't a birther and doesn't fall for every trick put out by the GOP doesn't mean they supported or support Obama. Why would you want Biden as president anyway? And Pelosi probably as Vice Pres. It's NOT like the GOP will gain from it. In fact it's distracting them from doing some much needed house cleaning.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-18   14:15:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: mininggold (#12)

Why would you want Biden as president anyway?

According to Orly, we'd only have Biden as president until there was a special election - about three months.

lucysmom  posted on  2009-08-19   0:01:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: lucysmom (#13)

According to Orly, we'd only have Biden as president until there was a special election - about three months.

I guess Ford was an illegal president.The only man to be president who was never elected and a Pubbie to boot. lolol

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-19   0:44:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: mininggold (#14)

I guess Ford was an illegal president.

Well, yes. But then we didn't have Orly the Russian/Israeli/American, to channel the intent of the founding fathers for us.

lucysmom  posted on  2009-08-19   10:16:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: lucysmom (#15)

Quick question. Who has verified Obama's qualifying documentation?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-19   10:28:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Jethro Tull (#17)

Quick question. Who has verified Obama's qualifying documentation?

Chief Justice Roberts by swearing him in and the entire HOR and Senate for voting 100% approval for the results of the presidential election.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-19   12:17:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: mininggold (#21)

And they have all seen the documents?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-19   12:20:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Jethro Tull (#22)

And they have all seen the documents?

You are free to ask em..... every damned one of them. They put their sig on the line..... that' all that counts in this country at this time. Take it up with your trusted representatives. Remember.....a representative republic? That's what we live in at this time. Surely someone (Ms Orly?) can presssure one of them to draw up articles for impeachment.

I still don't see what everyone sees in Biden that they would want him as president. It's not like he's got Agnew's problems and will be asked to step down at least yet. Maybe you want Obama to name his successor like Nixon. Now that would be interesting.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-19   12:28:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: mininggold (#23)

You are free to ask em..... every damned one of them.

So YOU have NO answer to the very simple question, "WHO (as in person) has seen the Obama documents."

Thank you and have a nice day.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-19   12:37:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Jethro Tull (#27)

So YOU have NO answer to the very simple question, "WHO (as in person) has seen the Obama documents."

Thank you and have a nice day.

Are you saying Chief Justice Roberts didn't do his job. LOLOL

And every representative by their sign of approval has said they have done this also. Don't you understand what is the def of a representative republic? Quit relying on bureaucrats to do the voters and their party's jobs. If you had questions you should have demanded the GOP get to the bottom of it in the period set aside for all the candidate stuff PRIOR to the election. That's what that period is for.

The voter's and their parties evidently squandered it.... oh well. Maybe next time they will stop oogling a cutsy broad put in as a distractor and get down to the real business of vetting the candidates. I hope they learned but it looks more like sour grapes and a desire for a coup.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-19   12:47:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: mininggold (#28)

So Roberts has seen them?

When?

What is his background regarding forensic evidence?

Does he have ANY experience, if yes, please provide some the specifics.

Thanks again.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-19   12:57:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Jethro Tull (#30)

Are you saying that Roberts confides in me and I'm privy to the private details of his job? LOLOL

He put his reputation on the line the only way he can, by swearing in Obama and signing on the dotted line.

Quit putting your faith in bureaucrats and do your own vetting next time if you are so unhappy. Personally I don't want a coup of any sort and I certainly don't want the possible circumstance of Obama being able to name his own replacement.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-19   13:02:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull, All (#31)

Quit putting your faith in bureaucrats and do your own vetting next time if you are so unhappy. Personally I don't want a coup of any sort and I certainly don't want the possible circumstance of Obama being able to name his own replacement.

Especially with a Dem loaded Congress.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-19   13:07:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: mininggold (#34)

Again, name anyone who has seen Obama's documents and then verified them as original and valid.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-19   13:09:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Jethro Tull (#35)

Again, name anyone who has seen Obama's documents and then verified them as original and valid.

Name anyone who saw Bush's, or Clinton's, or Bush's, or Reagan's, or Hoovers, or Buchanan's. The President doesn't have to show documents to be sworn in.

Rhino369  posted on  2009-08-19   13:17:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Rhino369 (#43)

Name anyone who saw Bush's, or Clinton's, or Bush's, or Reagan's, or Hoovers, or Buchanan's. The President doesn't have to show documents to be sworn in.

So you're claiming neither Bush I, nor Clinton, nor Bush II, nor Reagan, nor Hoover, nor Buchanan nor ANY previous President had provided ANY legitimate documentation before being sworn in as President?

And you know this how....???

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-19   13:28:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: F16Fighter (#55)

So you're claiming neither Bush I, nor Clinton, nor Bush II, nor Reagan, nor Hoover, nor Buchanan nor ANY previous President had provided ANY legitimate documentation before being sworn in as President?

And you know this how....???

You were posting about a bureaucrat verifying the documentation, so there should be signed documentation attesting to the legitimacy of all the presidents by signed some vaunted bureaucrat that you can find on the internet from the government archives. Go find it, ball in your court.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-19   13:32:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 58.

        There are no replies to Comment # 58.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 58.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]