[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Orly Finally finds an Honest Journalist
Source: youtube
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 19, 2009
Author: Orly?
Post Date: 2009-08-19 13:32:00 by IDon'tThinkSo
Keywords: None
Views: 1479
Comments: 76

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-36) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#37. To: Rhino369 (#36)

No other officer holder has such a questionable background, but hey, start a crusade.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-20   10:13:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Jethro Tull (#37)

No other officer holder has such a questionable background, but hey, start a crusade.

What is questionable? What leads you to believe he wasn't born a citizen?

Rhino369  posted on  2009-08-20   10:14:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: IDon'tThinkSo, Jethro Tull (#7)

Hannity is a half-wit political hack...

...Who just happens to be cleaning 0bama's clock day in and day out. And somehow exposing 0bama, 0bama's weak socialist policies, 0bama's hypocrisy, and 0bama's incompetence make Hannity a "hack"?

Whatever.

Fund works for the WSJ and ghostwrites books for conservatives on the side.

Wow. That's your "evidence" which supposedly invalidates John Fund's observations that 0bama is a disaster in every sense of the word?

Oh I forget - Brian Williams, Olbermann, HuffPo, and The Daily Kos are "credible."

Tell me - Just what has 0bama and his regime achieved thus far that actually benefits America? ANYONE??

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   10:18:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Jethro Tull, IDon'tThinkSo (#4)

Is the material [of John Fund] in error?

If so, where?

I be interested in that erroneous material or claims of 0bama and the Regime as well...

Can you point to anything specific, IDTS?

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   10:21:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Rhino369 (#38)

Gee, I don't know if he is or isn't a citizen. Where I differ with you is that I believe the American people should know - very well - the background of our political hires. You seem to shrug off any such effort which I find to be a byproduct of MSM brain damage.

Lemming is a suitable word.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-20   10:21:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: F16Fighter (#39)

I bet you buy tickets to every Hannity event. LOLOL

Tell me - Just what has 0bama and his regime achieved thus far that actually benefits America? ANYONE??

About the same as Bush's. Hmmmmm he was gearing up to push amnesty IIRC but then in what will be a few days he got his 911 and then the Patriot Act and that vaunted DHS you love so much.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   10:24:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: F16Fighter (#39)

Oh I forget - Brian Williams, Olbermann, HuffPo, and The Daily Kos are "credible."

Bingo.

It's funny how they defend the Big O, even to the point of using the pointmen of the MSM.

Dolts explain the current state of our nation.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-20   10:25:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: mininggold, IDon'tThinkSo, Jethro Tull (#11)

JT's job today is to go around and try to play "pin the label on the poster". He can't wrap his little mind around the two party collusion theory.

Firstly, it can't help but be noticed that some posters (like YOU and IDTS) find it necessary to defend the so-called "honor" of the Socialist-in-Chief and his fascist hijacking of the US Government. Why is that?

Secondly, do you actually really believe 0bama and Sarah Palin are actually "colluding" and playing for the same "team"?

Wow.

P.S. - *hiccup*

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   10:27:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Jethro Tull (#43)

It's funny how they defend the Big O, even to the point of using the pointmen of the MSM.

Dolts explain the current state of our nation.

Yep.

My fear is that we run out of gin and saltines for these parrots.

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   10:29:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Jethro Tull (#41)

Gee, I don't know if he is or isn't a citizen. Where I differ with you is that I believe the American people should know - very well - the background of our political hires. You seem to shrug off any such effort which I find to be a byproduct of MSM brain damage.

Lemming is a suitable word.

The voters chose to vote for a candidate who wasn't forthcoming. What's so unusual about that?

I never saw a push from the GOP or any party either concerning his BC during what seemed like the longest election season of my lifetime. It was brought up a couple of times in cursory fashion, usually with the qualification that this was a gentleman's election and neither of the main candidates were going to unearth the sordid details of each others pasts. And for insurance the GOP dangled a cutsy bimbopoo VP candidate for the party faithful to drool over. All thought of vetting Obama seemed to stop AT THAT POINT..

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   10:36:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: mininggold (#42)

I bet you buy tickets to every Hannity event. LOLOL

Naah. It's more convenient to watch him slice and dice all-things-0bama right on FOX.

[0bama has achieved] About the same as Bush's.

No, 0bama has actually "achieved" faaaaar more than Bush; Though you have nothing to worry about, calling half the country "terrorists," accusing whites of being "racist," tripling our debt, taking over banks, car companies, and health care is quite the "achievement."

Hmmmmm he was gearing up to push amnesty IIRC but then in what will be a few days he got his 911 and then the Patriot Act and that vaunted DHS you love so much.

If Bush was a dope and traitor, 0bama is a Dope x10 and Traitor x100.

Or do you consider 0bama a "American Patriot"?

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   10:40:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: F16Fighter (#44)

rstly, it can't help but be noticed that some posters (like YOU and IDTS) find it necessary to defend the so-called "honor" of the Socialist-in-Chief and his fascist hijacking of the US Government. Why is that?

Please post a link to where I defend Obamer's honor. You really need to stop your delusional pathology here.

One thing I do notice is that you trolls never comment on the offending parties and their antics. I guess that paycheck must come in handy in your old age.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   10:43:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Jethro Tull, Rhino369 (#37)

No other officer holder has such a questionable background, but hey, start a crusade.

LOL...

Whatchoo talkin' about Willis? 0bama's background is TOTALLY "transparent." Bwaahaa!

It is truly amazing to watch supporters of a man who refuses to divulge so much much as an iota of personal documentation....accept as "credentials" an empty slate of documentation, but what's the big deal? It's only about controlling and dictating their lives. No biggie.

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   10:47:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: mininggold (#48)

Please post a link to where I defend Obamer's honor.

Shirley, you jest. Funny. Hah-ha!

Can you ever defend 0bama on his own merit (of lack of) without mentioning Bush?

Never mind.

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   10:50:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: F16Fighter (#47)

If Bush was a dope and traitor, 0bama is a Dope x10 and Traitor x100.

Just your opinion at this point and nothing more... I will admit he has the potential but I'm waiting for the link to my comment ..... certainly an "astute" poster such as yourself had a particular comment in mind instead of your usual distraction.

All you GOPbots have proven lately is that you can lie and spin. And not perform due deligence before the election.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   10:52:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: mininggold, Jethro Tull (#46)

I never saw a push from the GOP or any party either concerning his BC during what seemed like the longest election season of my lifetime.

You seem painfully unable to discern between "GOP," and "conservative" and their respective beliefs. I realize that you are totally oblivious that the RNC has been at odds with conservatives...

And for insurance the GOP dangled a cutsy bimbopoo VP candidate for the party faithful to drool over. All thought of vetting Obama seemed to stop AT THAT POINT.

Lame diversion, but shall we expect anymore of a shill? We understand. ANYTHING that helps detract from the elephant in the room that is 0'BOMBA is helpful to your cause.

Btw, have you noticed that "cutsy bimbopoo" has now positioned herself to absolutely HAMMER your guy 0bama with impunity? That you continue to obsess and kvetch over Palin makes her even more scrumptious - Better put some ice on that.

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:01:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: mininggold (#51)

All you GOPbots have proven lately is that you can lie and spin.

I am willing to consider your specific charges of "lies".

HAVE you any?

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:04:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: mininggold (#46)

The voters chose to vote for a candidate who wasn't forthcoming. What's so unusual about that?

Not much, but why would anyone concerned with our nation not encourage a full investigation of HIS background, however belated?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-08-20   11:05:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Jethro Tull (#54)

Not much, but why would anyone concerned with our nation not encourage a full investigation of HIS background, however belated?

What's the point when it uses up all the energy needed to clean the GOP house and either gets us Biden or opens the possibility of Obama choosing his own successor. Has anyone here ever thought this through?

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:10:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: F16Fighter (#44)

Firstly, it can't help but be noticed that some posters (like YOU and IDTS) find it necessary to defend the so-called "honor" of the Socialist-in-Chief and his fascist hijacking of the US Government.

Care to show me where I've done that, or are you just talking out of your ass like JT is?

If you can't back up what you just claimed, then stop pinging me to your crap postings.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-08-20   11:10:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: F16Fighter (#40)

Is the material [of John Fund] in error?

If so, where?

Care to quote me saying that it was?

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-08-20   11:11:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#56)

Stop playing dumb.

Knocking Orly and Limbaugh is "discrediting" critics of your Dear Leader, isn't it?

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:13:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: F16Fighter (#39)

Fund works for the WSJ and ghostwrites books for conservatives on the side.

That's just a fact, not "evidence".

It simply shows he has a particular point of view, just like almost everyone does.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-08-20   11:13:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: F16Fighter (#58)

Can't come up with a quote to back your statement up, can you?

Then I'm calling you out as a liar.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-08-20   11:14:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: F16Fighter (#53)

I am willing to consider your specific charges of "lies".

HAVE you any?

I'm still waiting but I won't hold my breath for you to make good. You can't support your claim of what I supposedly posted so what you stated is a lie. Or are you deficient in cognitive functioning too? See your doc about changing your diabetic meds please. Your thinking is becoming contorted.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:16:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: IDon'tThinkSo, Jethro Tull (#57)

JT: Is the material [of John Fund] in error?

If so, where?

These were questions posed to in response to your "ghost-writer" criticism as it related to Rush Limbaugh.

Now...WERE there errors of fact by Fund?

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:17:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#60)

Can't come up with a quote to back your statement up, can you?

Then I'm calling you out as a liar

F-whatever has always played fast and loose with the facts. It's the thrill of the chase it craves, being accurate isn't even in it's top ten.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:18:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: mininggold (#61)

You can't support your claim of what I supposedly posted so what you stated is a lie. Or are you deficient in cognitive functioning too? See your doc about changing your diabetic meds please. Your thinking is becoming contorted.

Lol, that's quite the methane cloud.

Well done.

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:20:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: F16Fighter (#62)

hese were questions posed to in response to your "ghost-writer" criticism as it related to Rush Limbaugh.

Now...WERE there errors of fact by Fund?

Quit spinning IDTS's statement. IDTS said nothing derogatory about Fund, merely stated an accurate, verifiable fact. You should try stating accurate facts. It doesn't hurt and you may come to even like it.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:21:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: mininggold (#63)

F-whatever has always played fast and loose with the facts.

Please provide some (or one)... if you can.

Thank You.

(tick...tick...)

*hiccup*

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:21:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: F16Fighter (#64)

Lol, that's quite the methane cloud.

Well done.

I'm waiting for your evidence all the distracting BS you post not withstanding. I'm with IDTS.... please don't ping me to your non verifiable BS. Talk about methane, they could hook you up to a tank and power three houses, just today. Take some Tums. LOLOLOLOL

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:24:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: F16Fighter (#66)

Please provide some (or one)... if you can.

Thank You.

My statement proving your assertion for one. LOLOLOL I'm still waiting.......

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:27:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: mininggold (#67)

LOLOLOLOL

They have a cure for that; It's called a "Straight-Jacket."

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:27:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: F16Fighter (#69)

They have a cure for that; It's called a "Straight-Jacket."

Still waiting...... your so called humor wears thin. Evidently your purpose here is to spread lies.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:28:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: mininggold (#67)

don't ping me to your non verifiable BS.

You mean you didn't assert a "two party collusion theory" up-thread?

Again, I can assure you that Sarah Palin and your Dear Leader are NOT colluding toward the same goal.

Of course you're welcome to believe ANYTHING you want.

LOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLLOLLOLOLOLLOL!

(did I embellish the post with sufficient LOLs?)

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:33:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: mininggold (#70)

your purpose here is to spread lies.

Which ones, Roberta Gibbs?

Liberator  posted on  2009-08-20   11:34:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: F16Fighter (#71)

You mean you didn't assert a "two party collusion theory" up-thread?

Pray tell, what position of power does Ms Palin now occupy in either party except in your delusional mind that is? Can't get your "mind" off quitters can you?

And you evidently weren't around when Frist and Lott handed the Senate to the Dems. No collusion there.... no siree. LOLOLOL BWAHAHAHAHA

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:39:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: F16Fighter (#72)

Which ones, Roberta Gibbs?

I have no idea what you are distracting about again. You really are tedious in your continued dishonesty. You can twist and BS all you want but you can't deny facts or produce accurate statements. No wonder you Birthers love Ms Orly. LOLOLOL

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   11:42:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: mininggold (#73)

Pray tell, what position of power does Ms Palin now occupy in either party except in your delusional mind that is?

Republican Party Bimbo doesn't count?

Rhino369  posted on  2009-08-20   12:01:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Rhino369 (#75)

Republican Party Bimbo doesn't count?

She did her job nicely!!

But age, a toll will take !!!!!

Must be the work of Satan!!!!!!

lolol

I know, I know... my imitation of BY isn't very good.

mininggold  posted on  2009-08-20   12:08:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]