[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Americans: Serfs Ruled by Oligarchs Americans think that they have freedom and democracy and that politicians are held accountable by elections. The fact of the matter is that the US is ruled by powerful interest groups who control politicians with campaign contributions. Our real rulers are an oligarchy of financial and military/security interests and AIPAC, which influences US foreign policy for the benefit of Israel. Have a look at economic policy. It is being run for the benefit of large financial concerns, such as Goldman Sachs. It was the banks, not the millions of Americans who have lost homes, jobs, health insurance, and pensions, that received $700 billion in TARP funds. The banks used this gift of capital to make more profits. In the middle of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, Goldman Sachs announced record second quarter profits and large six-figure bonuses for every employee. The Federal Reserves low interest rate policy is another gift to the banks. It lowers their cost of funds and increases their profits. With the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, banks became high-risk investment houses that trade financial instruments such as interest rate derivatives and mortgage backed securities. With abundant funds supplied virtually free by the Federal Reserve, banks are paying depositors virtually nothing on their savings. Despite the Federal Reserves low interest rate policy, beginning October 1 banks are raising the annual percentage rate (APR) on credit card purchases and cash advances and on balances that have a penalty rate because of late payment. Banks are also raising the late fee. In the midst of the worst economy since the 1930s, heavily indebted Americans, who are losing their jobs and their homes, are to be bled into bankruptcy by the very banks that are being subsidized with TARP funds and low interest rates. Moreover, it is the American public that is on the hook for the TARP money and the low interest rates. As the US governments budget is 50% or more in the red, the TARP money has to be borrowed from abroad or monetized by the Fed. This means more pressure on the US dollars exchange value and a rise in import prices and also domestic inflation. Americans will thus pay for the TARP and low interest rate subsidies to their financial rulers with erosion in the purchasing power of the dollar. What we are experiencing is a massive redistribution of income from the American public to the financial sector. And this is occurring during a Democratic administration headed by Americas first black president, with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate. Is there a government anywhere that less represents its citizens than the US government? Consider Americas wars. As of the moment of writing, the out-of-pocket cost of Americas wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is $900,000,000,000. When you add in the already incurred future costs of veterans benefits, interest on the debt, the forgone use of the resources for productive purposes, and such other costs as computed by Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard University budget expert Linda Bilmes, our government has wasted $3,000,000,000,000three thousand billion dollarson two wars that have no benefit whatsoever for any American whose income does not derive from the military/security complex, about which five-star general President Eisenhower warned us. It is now a proven fact that the US invasion of Iraq was based on lies and deception of the American public. The only beneficiaries were the armaments industries, Blackwater, Halliburton, military officers who enjoy higher rates of promotion during war, and Muslim extremists whose case the US government proved by its unprovoked aggression against Muslims. No one else benefitted. Iraq was a threat to no one, and finding Saddam Hussein and executing him after a kangaroo trial had no effect whatsoever on ending the war or preventing the start of others. The cost of Americas wars is a huge burden on a bankrupt country, but the cost incurred by veterans might be even higher. Homelessness is a prevalent condition of veterans, as is post-traumatic stress. American soldiers, who naively fought for the munitions industrys wars, for high compensation for the munitions CEOs, and for dividends and capital gains for the munitions shareholders, paid not only with lives and lost limbs, but also with broken marriages, ruined careers, psychiatric disorders, and prison sentences for failing to make child support payments. What did Americans gain from an unaffordable war in Iraq that lasted far longer than World War II and that put into power Shiites allied with Iran? The answer is obvious: nothing whatsoever. What did the armaments industry gain? Billions of dollars in profits. What about President Obama? A corporate marketing creation, sums up the distinguished British journalist John Pilger. Obama is the presidential candidate who promised to end the war in Iraq. He hasnt. But he has escalated the war in Afghanistan, started a new war in Pakistan, intends to repeat the Yugoslav scenario in the Caucasus, and appears determined to start a war in South America. In response to the acceptance by US puppet president of Columbia, Alvaro Uribe, of seven US military bases in Columbia, Venezuela warned South American countries that the winds or war are beginning to blow. Here we have the US government, totally dependent on the generosity of foreigners to finance its red ink, which extends in large quantities as far as the eye can see, completely under the thumb of the military/security complex, which will destroy us all in order to meet Wall Street share price expectations. Why does any American care who rules Afghanistan? The country has nothing to do with us. Did the armed services committees of the House and Senate calculate the risk of destabilizing nuclear armed Pakistan when they acquiesced to Obamas new war there, a war that has already displaced two million Pakistanis? No, of course not. The whores took their orders from the same military/security oligarchy that instructed Obama. The great American superpower and its 300 million people are being driven straight into the ground by the narrow interest of the big banks and the munitions industry. People, and not only Americans, are losing their sons, husbands, brothers, and fathers for no other reason than the profits of US armaments corporations, and the gullible American people seem proud of it. Those ribbon decals on their cars, SUVs and monster trucks proclaim their naive loyalty to the armaments industries and to the whores in Washington who promote wars. Will Americans, smashed and destroyed by their governments policy, which always puts Americans last, ever understand who their real enemies are? Will Americans realize that they are not ruled by elected representatives but by an oligarchy that owns the Washington whorehouse? Will Americans ever understand that they are impotent serfs?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
#5. To: christine (#0)
Like MSM, Roberts is not giving us the full story, not even half of it. Armament industries, Blackwater, Haliburten, military officers are incidental beneficiaries of the Afghan and Iraq wars. By far, Israel is the the greatest beneficiary because Saddam is no longer funding one-way bombers into its territory and Arab fighters are no longer training in Afghanistan to help Palestinians get back land stolen by Zionist terrorists to form the illegal Israeli state. Had the Saddam-Taliban operations continued Israelis would have faced house-to-house fighting and more and more would be returning to Europe, Russia, etc. That's why Zionist agents in "think tanks" and their media associates went into a frenzy to incite an attack on Afghanistan after 911. Just dumping on the military-industrial complex borders on the kind of canard Zionists keep concocting to detract from their thievery and terrorism in Palestine. Without too much effort the industries manufacturing armaments can just as easily make any kind of industrial product, rail cars for example, for urban and inter-urban transportation systems, or wind power generating turbines. All these industries need is a call for tenders from government for rail cars, wind generators, hydro turbines, infrastructure components for electric or LNG-powered automobiles.
A single B2 is a 4 billion dollar windfall. (for Northrup Grumman) And there is no competition who could do it cheaper and underbid them next time. Our govt would be hard pressed to find suitable locations for a single billion worth of wind turbines, that is places where the wind power is adequate year round to justify the purchases and installations. And congress would also be making orphans out of the oil, gas and coal swindlers, all of which are used as backup to water turbines. These industries also know which congressman likes little boys' asses and which are already owned by ( and therefore involuntarily committed to) the well connected industries of old. And all the things you mentioned would involve govt competing with private industries. The only thing govt can spend on and not do that is the high cost of war and peace. You're certainly on the right track, though. If govt didn't suck the plasma out of the US to "keep us safe from cave dwelling fanatics" there would be no shortage of brilliant inventions or capital to bring them to the world. In fact I say that if we had been allowed to enjoy the peace dividend when ol Ivan folded his tent we'd all be riding around in flying transportation like The Jetsons by now.
Not to worry about the fate of oil,gas or coal swindlers since huge markets are opening up for these commodities in China and India. Australia has just authorized the sale of $50-billion of LNG developed by Exxon at the Gorgon field from which the government expects to collect $40-billion over the 20 years of the supply contract. That's on top of the $25-billion sold to India earlier. Large-scale projects like connecting more urban centers with high speed rail, perhaps extending it to Alaska, can be initiated only by government because of huge startup costs. Likewise the government is in the best position to launch a network of thousands of LNG and battery exchange stations, buying enough gas for future delivery, and if necessary, controlling gasoline price to keep natural gas lower priced in view of its comparative inconvenience compared to gasoline.
There are no replies to Comment # 10. End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|