See other Activism Articles
Title: Imagine if All Altheists Left America
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 21, 2009
Author: jeebsy12
Post Date: 2009-08-21 08:58:02 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 5895
Comments: 73
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-6) not displayed.
.
.
.
#7. To: PSUSA (#5)
No doubt you are a govt narc. Are you the guy I saw on that video years back demonizing the founding fathers calling them terrorists?
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
No actually I am just posting an article. One I happen to mostly agree with. There is no doubt that the politics in the country would change for the better if there were no more atheists. That is not an opinion but a fact.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
No, it's an opinion being presented as a fact, based on false assumptions and pre-made demons ready for whipping. I'm sorry, but it's an ignorant, narrow, small minded and rather absurd view for the author to take. There's no further need to argue about this, since there's nothing to debate. One cannot force people to learn after all. I know for a fact I'm right on this, having experience of knowing many agnostics/atheists who believe strongly in the principles of the founders, so the article is de facto a dead letter. Cheers
We are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights..... We make this constitution to secure the blessing...... Actually they do. Quit being PC. That god Jefferson wrote about in the declaration wasn't your god. He didn't believe in your god.
Maybe you should show us how a good Christian behaves... Try taking down the article you put up on your site dissing the hostess here, while you are using her site as we post. That would show the world, you, at least, incorporated the Christian principles you expound into your OWN life.
What's his website?
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance. -Sun Tzu
I suppose if you like socialism, then your statement would be true.
http://www.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi And the "article" is still on the sidebar.
Again, too bad they really didn't believe that. They are quite typical of most "christians" though, in that they say one thing and do something else entirely. .
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance. -Sun Tzu
You are a liar. I have posted no such article.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
Your entitled to your opinion.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
I know. I'm also entitled to my experience. I can only judge people based on their individual actions and words, and how well they align the two. Collective judgments just don't work. Hope your day goes well.
So you are imitating the ID of the host of another website? That's equally despicable.
No. I just said you are a liar. I have posted no such article. It is easy enough for anyone to check out that you are lying or at the least very mistaken.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
He's backtracking. He didn't post it, but it is on his site.
He didn't post it, but it is on his site. How am I backtracking? Minningold said something that isn't true about me. I told him it isn't true then he accused me of impersonating myself. No backtracking here. But mininggold should backtrack. Do you think I should have a policy over there to take down articles critical of certain people or subjects? If so would you make me a list?
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
Maybe a title edit would be in order of which I'm sure you are capable. Your website promotes the personal dissing of the hostess here over circumstances of which she has NO CONTROL, and is a private citizen, and yet you come here to post. I would think the same way if it mentioned Goldi too under similiar circumstances and you came over to post on LP under that ID.
He didn't post it, but it is on his site. He's playing dumb and irresponsible. Maybe someone needs to go over there and post a personal diatribe about him being the antichrist or similiar and we'll see how long his belief in free speech in all cases remains.
I have nothing against Christine. I like christine. I can't say the same for Goldi. My website promotes free speech. Even things I don't like sometimes. I don't want to be a hypocrite and say I am for free speech then take stuff down that is not slanderous or a threat on someones life or something really serious. People diss people all the time on the internet. When someone says something wrong should I delete it and cover for them?
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
That asshat over on the Nest is Gar, I bet.
When I first asked you, you denied having a site. I guess we've now moved past that.
F16Fighter would be my first guess. gar always uses lower case handles.
That is not true either. You must have a reading comprehension problem too.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
I don't know.... maybe a disclaimer. I've always had a hard time with forums raking private citizens over the coals in the title. It's not like she has any control over LP's problems.
That is not true either. You must have a reading comprehension problem too. #17. To: A K A Stone (#2) Why not invite longnose over to your site? That way you can have two posters and longnose will have another site to get his important message out. IDon'tThinkSo posted on 2009-08-07 #22. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#17) Who told you I have a site? I guess you know me better than I know you.
Mr Gold. I've read you on LP before. I think you are an ok guy. Or maybe your a gal i don't know. Just thought you should know that. I'm not as edity and delete happy as goldi. I just pretty much let things go where they go. Someone did call someone a nigger before and i deleted that. Or actually I put in a couple of *'s. In hindsight I should have just left it.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
#22. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#17) Who told you I have a site? I guess you know me better than I know you. Where is the denial in that post. I can see how you might take my words and think that. What I was saying is this. Hmm this guy knows I have a site. I wonder how he knows as i have never told him. I don't even remember if I have ever talked to him. He must know me better then i know him because he knows I have a site and I have seen his screen name before but don't know any of his positions or if I have even talked to him before. Hope that clears it up for you.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
Say that to me and I'll put in a good word for you with my bosses at the bureau. Maybe I can get you off the red list. It just depends on your asskissing skills. Pucker up!!!!!!! .
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance. -Sun Tzu
I give you a hard time and I have my doubts about you. But your ok too sometimes. I like your preparedness list. I fear it is a honey pot though.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
If all the atheists left America, ideologically we’d be back to the principals of the Founding Fathers. oh good....atheists vs luciferians......... The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were anti-Christ and anti-Christian documents....wish more people would understand that. [Ezekiel 17:7-10/Matthew 15:13] =========================== edit. that flag says it all....[the floundering fathers weren't Christians; Christians wouldn't identify themselves with the serpent in Genesis 3:15] btw.... "....Now you have the answers to what is and has happened to the American people. Truthfully, it started when President Washington used the first "emergency power’s act" in 1791, so he could, unconstitutionally in peace time, but constitutional in war time because it was "necessary" to install the first private bank in America. He then set up each State as a "district State" so the United States could control through its "district courts" what it could not do under the original constitution in time of peace. They took the physical State and overlaid it with a fictitious "district state." That is why you have U.S. district courts in every State of the Union. James Montgomery has documented this action, and I believe he has it posted on www.atgpress.com in his section immediately below the Informer's section. To get to the bottom of all your woes today, one must go back in time to see how they accomplished this. This is why I have stated that IF the people, the common everyday people, had really drafted AND ratified their own creation of a contract, do you think they would, or rather put you in their position, drafted such a damaging piece of paper called the "Constitution?" I know I would not have. Especially the emergency powers part where once the President took control, constitutionally mind you, that it would be the engine for total control. Such has been the case since 1791. Patrick Henry and the other anti-federalists saw what was happening and the common average man on the street, just like today, said it could not happen and allowed this to happen out of shear ignorance. Today we have most of the people who have no clue what really took place. They cannot fathom why they rape them repeatedly again and cannot claim their unalienable rights. They cannot understand why the so-called Bill of Rights can no longer be used. They cannot understand why the Constitution that they thought was theirs, is not, and cannot be used in the prize courts of admiralty. Simply stated, "enemies have no rights." What is fascinating is this passage from Solicitor of Lincoln's War Department, William Whiting's book on War Powers, where he wrote; "The belligerent right of the government to confiscate enemy's real estates, situated in this country, can hardly admit of question. The title is to no inconsiderable part of real estate in each of the original States of the Union, rests upon the validity of confiscation acts, passed by our ancestors against loyal adherents to the crown. Probably none of these States failed to pass and apply these laws. English and American acts of confiscation were recognized by the laws of both countries, and their operation modified by treaties; their validity was never denied. The only authority which either of the States or colonies ever had for passing such laws was derived from the fact that they were belligerents." Right here it is evident that the States, created the same way the United States was, by the aristocrats, would consider themselves belligerents against the common man on the street who had no say in the drafting and ratifying of any of the constitutions of any of the States. The common man had no money to speak of nor any large amount of real property to be able to become a member of the contract called the State. In all the States you had to have at least 500 pounds sterling or a land mass equivalent to that amount before becoming an elector or even thinking of running for office. This is but another small proof that you and me, the common man of that era, was considered as nothing. Just like we look at street bums of today, they looked at the common man. No dear people, we were never considered part of their posterity and never drafted nor ratified any constitution. The statement the constitution was "divinely inspired" is so far from the truth that it should be stated that it was the "works of the devil." ...." "...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Sour grapes from offsite malcontents. Murron/RebelGal needs to bring it here and say it in person.
_________________________________________________________________________ Maybe it is. Maybe it isn't. No point in arguing about it. The only things I recall disagreeing about are religious topics. Religion being the curse it is, same as politics and authoritarians. Unless you are a pig. Pigs really dont like what I post. I know that from past experience. I bet some of them would kill me if they could find me. If religious disagreements are all it takes to be labeled a fed, then there are lots of feds out there. .
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance. -Sun Tzu
had a thought re: your thread on traffic tickets. here's where your District Courts [where I'm reading most all civil and criminal trials, you know the ones, where they extort the people] come from.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
What's an Altheist?
In 2007, the FBI reported on concern about white supremacists recruiting soldiers, saying "hundreds" of neo-Nazis were in the active military. But in April, a Department of Homeland Security report on extremism that reiterated much the same point was widely criticized by veterans groups and some conservative politicians as being unpatriotic, leading the Justice Department to retract the DHS report. Critics acknowledge that extremism in the Army is a touchy political subject. Someone who trades stocks on the DJIA exchange.
Not me. I am a holy, wholely man.
That raises more questions than it answers.
In 2007, the FBI reported on concern about white supremacists recruiting soldiers, saying "hundreds" of neo-Nazis were in the active military. But in April, a Department of Homeland Security report on extremism that reiterated much the same point was widely criticized by veterans groups and some conservative politicians as being unpatriotic, leading the Justice Department to retract the DHS report. Critics acknowledge that extremism in the Army is a touchy political subject. mmmm
Ewww, gross!
In 2007, the FBI reported on concern about white supremacists recruiting soldiers, saying "hundreds" of neo-Nazis were in the active military. But in April, a Department of Homeland Security report on extremism that reiterated much the same point was widely criticized by veterans groups and some conservative politicians as being unpatriotic, leading the Justice Department to retract the DHS report. Critics acknowledge that extremism in the Army is a touchy political subject. why?
Because I have reading comprehension problems, ok? There, I said it, now quit riding me, can I have an antacid and a glass of milk?
In 2007, the FBI reported on concern about white supremacists recruiting soldiers, saying "hundreds" of neo-Nazis were in the active military. But in April, a Department of Homeland Security report on extremism that reiterated much the same point was widely criticized by veterans groups and some conservative politicians as being unpatriotic, leading the Justice Department to retract the DHS report. Critics acknowledge that extremism in the Army is a touchy political subject.
Comments (48 - 73) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestToo bad they didn't really believe that.
#8. To: SonOfLiberty (#6)
In essence, you're looking to make enemies where there are some friends.
#9. To: A K A Stone (#8)
#10. To: A K A Stone (#4)
#11. To: A K A Stone (#1)
If all the atheists left America, ideologically we’d be back to the principals of the Founding Fathers
#12. To: mininggold (#11)
#13. To: A K A Stone (#8)
There is no doubt that the politics in the country would change for the better if there were no more atheists. That is not an opinion but a fact.
#14. To: PSUSA (#12)
What's his website?
#15. To: A K A Stone (#7)
#16. To: mininggold (#14)
And the "article" is still on the sidebar.
#17. To: SonOfLiberty (#9)
having experience of knowing many agnostics/atheists who believe strongly in the principles of the founders, so the article is de facto a dead letter.
#18. To: A K A Stone (#17)
#19. To: A K A Stone (#16)
You are a liar. I have posted no such article.
#20. To: mininggold (#19)
#21. To: mininggold (#19)
So you are imitating the ID of the host of another website? That's equally despicable.
#22. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#21)
He's backtracking.
#23. To: A K A Stone (#22)
Minningold said something that isn't true about me. I told him it isn't true then he accused me of impersonating myself. No backtracking here. But mininggold should backtrack. Do you think I should have a policy over there to take down articles critical of certain people or subjects? If so would you make me a list?
#24. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#21)
He's backtracking.
#25. To: mininggold (#23)
#26. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#21)
#27. To: A K A Stone (#22)
How am I backtracking?
#28. To: Jethro Tull, F16Fighter (#26)
That asshat over on the Nest is Gar, I bet.
#29. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#27)
When I first asked you, you denied having a site.
#30. To: A K A Stone, christine (#25)
I have nothing against Christine. I like christine. I can't say the same for Goldi. My website promotes free speech. Even things I don't like sometimes. I don't want to be a hypocrite and say I am for free speech then take stuff down that is not slanderous or a threat on someones life or something really serious. People diss people all the time on the internet. When someone says something wrong should I delete it and cover for them?
#31. To: A K A Stone (#29)
When I first asked you, you denied having a site.
#32. To: mininggold (#30)
#33. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#31)
IDon'tThinkSo posted on 2009-08-07
#34. To: A K A Stone (#32)
I think you are an ok guy.
#35. To: PSUSA (#34)
#36. To: A K A Stone (#1)
(Edited)
#37. To: mininggold (#14)
And the "article" is still on the sidebar.
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?”
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#38. To: A K A Stone (#35)
I fear it is a honey pot though.
#39. To: Artisan (#36)
"....Now you have the answers to what is and has happened to the American people. Truthfully, it started when President Washington used the first "emergency power’s act" in 1791, so he could, unconstitutionally in peace time, but constitutional in war time because it was "necessary" to install the first private bank in America. He then set up each State as a "district State" so the United States could control through its "district courts" what it could not do under the original constitution in time of peace. They took the physical State and overlaid it with a fictitious "district state." That is why you have U.S. district courts in every State of the Union. James Montgomery has documented this action, and I believe he has it posted on www.atgpress.com in his section immediately below the Informer's section.
#40. To: A K A Stone (#0)
(Edited)
#41. To: Dakmar, buckeroo (#40)
What's an Altheist?
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#42. To: Esso (#41)
#43. To: Esso (#41)
(Edited)
#44. To: buckeroo (#42)
wholely man.
"If, from the more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those which are in an advanced stage of improvement, we still find the greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry, and grasping the spoil of the multitude. Invention is continually exercised, to furnish new pretenses for revenues and taxation. It watches prosperity as its prey and permits none to escape without tribute." --Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1791
#45. To: farmfriend (#44)
#46. To: Dakmar (#45)
Ewww, gross!
"If, from the more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those which are in an advanced stage of improvement, we still find the greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry, and grasping the spoil of the multitude. Invention is continually exercised, to furnish new pretenses for revenues and taxation. It watches prosperity as its prey and permits none to escape without tribute." --Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1791
#47. To: farmfriend (#46)
.
.
.