There is but one sound reason I can accept as to why the government has allowed this invasion. Certainly we can all agree there are no Nobel Prize winners in the current influx, rather the vast majority are "consumers" of government handouts, one way or another.
Looking down the road, I see but ONE viable reason to allow in this rabble.
By comparison, the United States, Canada, and Russia have large land masses but small populations. Russia as a world power is in dire straits population wise because their Asian neighbors number in the billions.
Canada number two in size, is not a world power and is a basket case if they had to defend themselves. For that they depend on us.
Looking from Turkey Eastward thru China to the Pacific, we have untold BILLIONS of people. Billions.
The United States is in the Middle East militarily to stay. We lack one vital thing, boots on the ground. No war has ever been fought without masses of men on the ground, killing each other.
When push comes to shove, our "allies" will not fight, not a one. Look at our current stand in ME, we provide over 90 per cent of the boots on the ground.
With that in mind and a massive land war breaks out, we will need unlimited cannon fodder, millions. In WW2 we scraped the barrel, taking old men and anyone that could walk in.
With that 'quality' of troop, we'd probably get our butts kicked even worse than we are now.
Yes.
With a nuclear standoff, we are at a very serious disadvantage.
The Asians can walk to war, recall the Golden Hordes rode ponies all the way to France. We are thousands of miles away.
Human life to Asian governments has always been of little interest. I read a few days ago that China alone could muster 20,000,000 men to battle in only a few months time.
Korea is a prime example. Chinese walked to war. A cheap cotton, padded uniform, a hat, a rifle and ammo and a small bag of rice, if thery were wounded, they were dead. Thousands froze to death.
We are about to engage in a war with which we have limited experience.
Actually, it's nukes that level the playing field for us in that situation. We (the U.S.) can split the core of the earth, what, 7 times or something with our nukes? 20 million man armies don't hold up well on a planet with a split core (nor do, I'm afraid, those who did split the core).
I think that a world level war against a 20 million man army with intents to wipe the nation off of the earth, would probably change some minds about nukes. Just a hunch.