[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail,”

You Know What Happens Next

Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’

Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West

Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID

Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files

Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency!

Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA

Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information
Source: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/08/30/in
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 30, 2009
Author: PRLog
Post Date: 2009-09-03 23:06:04 by rack42
Keywords: 911, Pentagon
Views: 2547
Comments: 53

Researchers present new eyewitness testimony which they say proves the government's story to be a "monstrous lie"

A three year independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon has yielded new eyewitness evidence which, according to the Southern California-based researchers who conducted the investigation, "conclusively (and unfortunately) establishes as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a military black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception."

They have compiled the most pertinent testimony into an 81 minute video presentation entitled National Security Alert, which has earned the respect and praise of a growing number of distinguished academics, journalists, writers, entertainers, pilots, and military personnel.

The investigation involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day. It was primarily conducted by two men named Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis, also known as Citizen Investigation Team, or CIT.

"There were a growing number of people in the United States and around the world who were suspicious of the government's story about what had happened at the Pentagon that day," Ranke explains. "The doubts were initially fueled by the dubious damage to the building, which seemed incompatible with a 757 crash, the deliberate lack of transparency by the authorities, and many other issues, but they really intensified after a team of professional pilots (Pilots for 9/11 Truth) analyzed the data obtained from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2006, which was supposedly from the black box of American Airlines Flight 77, and found that the last reported altitude of the plane was far too high to have struck the light poles or the building. This meant that either the plane did not cause the observed physical damage, that the government had released fraudulent data, or both."

"We were tired of the cover-up, but we were also frustrated with the dead-end theorizing that was taking place", says Marquis of the project's genesis. "We knew that the only way we were ever going to know what had really happened was if we actually went to the area, knocked on doors, and interviewed everyday people about what they saw."

NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT from Citizen Investigation Team on Vimeo.

When these eyewitness accounts are aggregated, they paint a very disturbing picture, say the researchers.

"To put it as concisely as possible, the plane had to have flown on a very specific flight path in the final seconds before it reached the Pentagon in order to have caused the observed damage, starting with the light poles that were photographed on the ground and ending with the directional damage to the building itself which was outlined in detail by the American Society of Civil Engineers," explains Ranke. "The government claims the plane flew on this flight path and hit the building. The eyewitnesses in all of the most critical vantage points, on the other hand, independently, unanimously, and unequivocally report a drastically different flight path, proving that the plane absolutely could not have hit the light poles or the building. It is a non-controversial scientific fact that a strike from this trajectory would have caused a very different damage path."

It wasn't just witnesses who watched the plane approach the building that the team spoke with, however.

"We've also published our interview with a Pentagon police officer who saw the plane flying away from the Pentagon immediately after the explosion", says Marquis. "We already knew that the plane could not have hit based on the testimony of the witnesses on the other side of the building who watched it approach, but it was still vindicating to get this kind of confirmation."

A 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll found that "More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East." Nevertheless, Ranke and Marquis acknowledge it is still quite controversial to claim, as they do, that "criminal elements within the U.S. government" were complicit in the attacks.

"If you are skeptical of (or even incensed by) this statement we do not blame you," reads a note on the front page of their website, CitizenInvestigationTeam.com. "We are not asking you to take our word for it, nor do we want you to do that. We want you to view the evidence and see with your own eyes that this is the case. We want you to hear it directly from the eyewitnesses who were there, just as we did."

Many people seem to be taking them up on this offer. Their video has already received almost 70,000 views online since it was first posted to their website a few weeks ago with only a grass roots promotional effort behind it.

Perhaps more notable than the size of the audience, however, is the caliber of some of the people in it. A newly-published compendium of endorsements on the CitizenInvestigationTeam.com website includes praise from a wide array of distinguished and well-respected Americans.

Emmy-award winning actor and former president of The Screen actors Guild, Ed Asner, calls the film a "reasoned, and methodical look at witness testimony the day the Pentagon was attacked on Sept. 11th".

Prolific non-ficition author Dr. Peter Dale Scott, Professor Emeritus of the University of California, Berkeley affirms that the film "successfully rebuts the official account of Flight 77's flight path on 9/11 as it approached the Pentagon".

"If you accept the placement of the plane as independently and unanimously reported by the witnesses presented in CIT's video National Security Alert, science proves that it did not cause the physical damage at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001", says FAA certified pilot Robert Balsamo.

Dr. David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé and many other titles, says he is "pleased to be able to recommend this important film with enthusiasm", while scholar, author, and radio host Dr. Kevin Barrett says that the film proves "that the official version of the attack on the Pentagon is false, and that the attack must have been a deceptive military operation, not the kamakaze crash of a hijacked commercial jet."

Scott McKinsey, an award-winning network television director, says "The DVD offers no theorizing or speculation; only corroborated eyewitness evidence contradicting the official flight data to support an overwhelming argument that a plane did not slam into the Pentagon on 9/11".

Architect Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), a coalition of over 700 professional architects and engineers calling for a new independent investigation of the destruction of the three skyscrapers in New York on 9/11 (the third was World Trade Center 7), calls the film "long overdue, but worth waiting for" and says that it "deserves serious attention".

Retired Navy Commander and aviator James R. Compton calls National Security Alert "the best reporting I've seen in a long, long time" and "a must see for every citizen in our country".

"Government and media figures who dare ignore evidence this conclusive do so at their own peril", warns Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, a retired Marine pilot who has flown 303 combat missions.

The full quotes from these individuals and others can be read at here.

National Security Alert can be viewed for free online here.


Poster Comment: Go to Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information for the pics and video.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 50.

#1. To: All (#0)

Can't edit after posting.

stupid

thanks

rack42  posted on  2009-09-03   23:09:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: rack42 (#1) (Edited)

Why not show photo of of the landing gear of the aircraft...INSIDE... the Pentagon.

Be interesting how they smuggled that in thru a solid wall.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-03   23:12:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Cynicom (#2)

Show me two engines, 8000 lbs (I built these type engines). So me the debis of these engines.

We went through this before. There is no evidence of two 4 ton engines of the JT-8 similar configuration (which I am familiar and were on those planes) in the debris.

Just stop it. And just stop crying "civility" when you can't take the heat for your unsupported claims.

rack42  posted on  2009-09-03   23:22:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: rack42 (#3)

Show the photo, and tell us how they got that gear that weighs hundreds of pounds into the building.

You have all the answers, tell us how it was done.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-03   23:24:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Cynicom (#4)

Show the photo, and tell us how they got that gear that weighs hundreds of pounds into the building.

You have all the answers, tell us how it was done.

Show me the gearbox.

Do you know what that is?

If anything survived, it would have been the gearbox and the high turbine.

Do you know that those are?

Do you know how these engines are constructed? I do. I built them.

Where is the gearbox? Where is the high turbine which drives the fan? No fan blades survived, as in broken-off?

You know nothing about these engines. The high turbine would not be destroyed in a fire yet it was never presented.

rack42  posted on  2009-09-03   23:34:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: rack42 (#5)

The photo is readily available on the net.

Find it, post it and explain how that portion of an aircraft landing gear was taken in, without someone noticing it.

If you have time you might find this interesting reading.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3912/is_200209/ai_n9094704/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3912/is_200209/ai_n9094704/

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-03   23:38:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Cynicom (#7)

You might find it MORE interesting how an engineered product(the high turbine) that is engineered to accept temperatures far above "burning kerosene" is not found in the building.

What has "Handling the dead" to do with "no engine metal parts found?"

You're presenting me with some landing gear and I'm asking for two 4 ton engines.

Hello?

rack42  posted on  2009-09-03   23:55:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: rack42, All (#13)

You are the self proclaimed expert.

Simple, show the photo, then explain to us how it got there.

As for the human remains, I am sure the self styled experts can explain that also.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-03   23:58:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Cynicom (#15)

You are the self proclaimed expert.

No, I'm not a "self proclaimed expert." I simply said that I've build these type of engines. Nice try (insert nasty reply here).

Now, you show me the melted High Turbine components. The high turbine takes the most heat. I won't go past that because you don't seem to understand anything about what I've posted reguarding thermodynamics.

As for the "human remains," how were they identified when the plane "melted?" Heat so great that the plane "melted," yet there was "human remains."

I'm suppose to be so stupid?

No more time for your silliness.

rack42  posted on  2009-09-04   0:18:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: rack42 (#18)

Well, if you cannot tell us how the landing gear got there, how about all those bodies the mortuary found, and relatives claimed????

Odd the relatives of the passengers on the flight, claimed their loved ones.

Dental records matched, DNA matched, the relatives were satisfied, how were these people conned into this scam????

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-04   0:34:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Cynicom (#19)

Well, if you cannot tell us how the landing gear got there, how about all those bodies the mortuary found, and relatives claimed????

Odd the relatives of the passengers on the flight, claimed their loved ones.

Dental records matched, DNA matched, the relatives were satisfied, how were these people conned into this scam????

Tell me how the plane "burned-up" yet bodies were found.

Where is the plane? How can "bodies" be found, yet the "plane" "burned-up?"

Landing gear survives but two 4 ton engines disappear?

Where are the two 4 ton engines?

Something doesn't add up.

The combustion chambers should have survived since it takes the most heat. Composed mostly of Cobalt and rather fragile.

Where are the fan blades?

Again, I say, there are certain components that should have survived but are not in evidence.

As for the FBI claims: Yeah, I trust the government.

Goodnight.

rack42  posted on  2009-09-04   0:46:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: rack42 (#23)

Aw shucks.

I was going to ask you if you have been present at the time of a large aircraft crash.

Darn.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-04   3:10:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Cynicom (#24)

Let's see : the government conspiracy theory is that the wings of the plane that hit the Pentagon "foulded" and the entire plane went into that little hole.

Let's take a view of physics of motion (which I explained to you several months ago).

The "plane" hits the Pentagon, it's motion causes the wings of the plane to "fold back." That's the problem. The engines are 4 tons each. In order for the wings to "fold back" their forward motion must stop and the foward motion of the engines must stop and move in a new direction. That direction is toward the fusalage and backward. I'll repeat: toward the fusalage and backward.

Tell me what is the instantanous force to cause 4 tons to stop it's foward direction and move into a new direction.

Actually, it's more than 4 tons because the wings have weight.

And you need to explain why the engines didn't detach as those did in the Airbus incident which did detach as they did by design when forces were such that it would be best that the engine dropped rather than the wing detached, which I said in a previous post.

Your lack of knowledge of simple physics is astonishing.

Oh, your come-back on experts: I need someone from "out of town" to tell me what to think?

Are you in the camp of those that believe that traveling by rail over 35mph will suffacate the travellers? That Man will never fly by machine?

That's where you seem to be camped in terms of physics: the 1880's.

Actually, much of this isn't about physics, it's mechanics which does reflect on physics, ie, forces, vectors, which you don't seem to comprehend.

But that's ok. I'm sure that you don't "get it," and never will.

rack42  posted on  2009-09-04   22:32:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: rack42 (#25)

For Odins' sake, DONT MENTION THE PENTALAWN!!!!!!!!!! thewebfairy.com/killtown/pentalawn.html

Cynicoms head will explode!!!

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-09-05   6:09:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: PSUSA (#46)

Are you following the discussion and wish to add something???

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-05   6:16:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Cynicom (#47)

Yeah.

I just did.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2009-09-05   7:25:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: PSUSA (#48)

Perhaps I missed something, having read that in many differing theories?

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-05   8:59:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Cynicom (#49) (Edited)

Perhaps I missed something, having read that in many differing theories?

Yes, perhaps like why there haven't beem any release of the videos confiscated by the FBI.

What do those videos show?

Perhaps your efforts should be directed to getting those "embargoed" videos of the FBI to prove your conjecture? HMMMMM?

Geez. I thought that you were a serious person discussing serious topic. My error.

rack42  posted on  2009-09-05   22:09:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 50.

#51. To: rack42 (#50)

Perhaps your efforts should be directed to getting those "embargoed" videos of the FBI to prove your conjecture? HMMMMM?

I expend NO efforts re the Pentagon affair. Zero.

As I said, it is of no interest.

There must be a simple explanation concerning the landing gear, inside the Pentagon. All of these differing groups are laden with "experts" yet no one will advance a scenario as to how the gear was inserted.

Of course, it just may be that the AA DID fly into the Pentagon?

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-05 22:16:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: rack42 (#50)

Witnesses

A message to 9/11 conspiracists from someone who was at the Pentagon on 9/11. Please take it to heart.

It is likely that hundreds of people directly saw flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Dozens were interviewed by numerous news outlets: Witness List 1 – List 2 – List 3 – List 4 – List 5 – More

Pentagon witness spreadsheet (Excel file)

Many witnesses were in their cars, in a traffic jam directly in front of the Pentagon. Most of those people drove away and were not interviewed. Below is a summary of the accounts quoted in the lists and spreadsheet summary above. These are mostly accounts that appeared in mainstream media reports. Many more people probably witnessed the attack.

From the lists above, 136 people saw the plane approach the Pentagon, and

104 directly saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

6 were nearly hit by the plane in front of the Pentagon. Several others were within 100-200 feet of the impact.

26 mentioned that it was an American Airlines jet.

39 others mentioned that it was a large jet/commercial airliner.

2 described a smaller corporate jet. 1 described a "commuter plane" but didn't mention the size.

7 said it was a Boeing 757.

8 witnesses were pilots. One witness was an Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower Chief.

2 witnesses were firefighters working on their truck at the Pentagon heliport.

4 made radio calls to inform emergency services that a plane had hit the Pentagon.

10 said the plane's flaps and landing gear were not deployed (1 thought landing gear struck a light pole).

16 mentioned seeing the plane hit light poles/trees, or were next to to the poles when it happened. Another 8 mentioned the light poles being knocked down: it's unknown if they saw them hit.

42 mentioned seeing aircraft debris. 4 mentioned seeing airline seats. 3 mentioned engine parts.

2 mentioned bodies still strapped into seats.

15 mentioned smelling or contacting aviation/jet fuel.

3 had vehicles damaged by light poles or aircraft debris. Several saw other occupied vehicles damaged.

3 took photographs of the aftermath.

Many mentioned false alarm warnings of other incoming planes after the crash. One said "3-4 warnings."

And of course,

0 saw a military aircraft or missile strike the Pentagon.

0 saw a plane narrowly miss the Pentagon and fly away.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-09-05 22:25:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 50.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]