[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Neocon Nuttery See other Neocon Nuttery Articles Title: SPIN METER: Once Medicare's Foe, GOP Now Boosts It (09-08) 08:02 PDT New York (AP) -- Weren't Republicans against Medicare before they were for it? It's a question vexing Democrats in the fierce battle over President Barack Obama's push for a health care overhaul as the head of the Republican Party has portrayed the GOP as the lone bulwark preventing deep cuts to the popular, government-run health plan for older people. It's a remarkable turnaround for a party whose leaders tried to slash billions from Medicare more than a decade ago and have assailed the program as a wasteful entitlement. None other than Ronald Reagan, a hero to Republicans, warned in 1961 that creation of Medicare would push the country toward socialism. The new GOP posture may be politically savvy given older Americans' fears of major changes to Medicare, which were among the concerns widely on display at angry town hall meetings across the country last month. But the new stance also contradicts the party's long history of skepticism toward government-run programs and Republican concerns about the long-term viability and health of the Medicare system. The Republican National Committee recently launched a new campaign, "The Seniors' Bill of Rights," that pledged to prevent cuts to Medicare and protect the elderly from health care rationing based on age. "Let's agree in both parties that Congress should only consider health reform proposals that protect senior citizens," the GOP chairman, Michael Steele, said in a television ad released in conjunction with the campaign. "What Steele is getting at is very straightforward," said Newt Gingrich, a Republican who as House speaker in 1995 proposed cutting Medicare by $270 billion over seven years. "The group Obama has lost most ground with is senior citizens and they are the group most likely to vote. If Michael Steele can consolidate the shift that's already under way, he's moving America back to a more conservative government." The health care bill making its way through the House would save an estimated $500 billion in Medicare over the next 10 years. To do so, Democrats have sought to cut reimbursements to providers and to limit subsidies for Medicare Advantage, a Republican-backed program that allows beneficiaries to buy insurance plans that offer more generous benefits. The Democratic National Committee released a new television ad Monday reminding voters of past GOP efforts to kill the Medicare program. The ad, titled "Republicans want to end Medicare," will air in ten GOP congressional districts; Reps. John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Eric Cantor, R-Va., members of the House Republican leadership, are among those targeted. Grover Norquist, president of the conservative Americans for Tax Reform, criticized the proposed changes to Medicare Advantage, saying it's the only part of the system that offers genuine competition. "It's $500 billion that won't be going to the elderly," Norquist said. He added that to achieve Obama's goal of universal coverage, the savings will go to "illegal immigrants, people who can self-insure, and healthy 30-year olds who don't want to pay for insurance." None of the health care bills provides coverage for illegal immigrants. Norquist, an outspoken critic of government-run programs, acknowledged that Medicare and other entitlements have never been popular among conservatives and Republicans, but they have no choice now but to work with the programs as they now exist. "If you were reinventing them, they'd be done differently," Norquist said. But for now, it's Republicans' turn to use Medicare as a partisan weapon even as party leaders have sent mixed messages about the program. Older people represent a significant voting bloc that traditionally turns out in nonpresidential year elections — the 2010 congressional races, for example. Steele has warned against moving toward a government-run "single payer" health care system, although Medicare is precisely that. Last spring, most Republicans voted in favor of a budget proposal that would end Medicare in its current form for people under 55, offering vouchers instead to pay for private health care accounts. Medicare was enacted in 1965 under President Lyndon B. Johnson as a national health care plan for the disabled and for people 65 and older. Those enrolled in the program may generally visit doctors and other providers they choose, and the federal government repays the provider through a negotiated fee-for-service rate. Over 43 million people were part of the program last year and the number is expected to swell to 77 million by 2031. Medicare's costs have skyrocketed and regulators have warned that the program is headed for insolvency if changes aren't made. Driving the costs are rapidly rising enrollment, a new prescription drug benefit that was never financed and the reality that the payroll tax rate that pays for the program has not gone up since 1986. Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/09/07/national/a210049D98.DTL#ixzz0QWoi9F4L
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
So phase them out. Propose, say, that anyone under the age of 45 today will not be eligible. Or just wait for them to collapse, which pretty much amounts to the same thing.
Anti-racism is code for white genocide. The call of "equality," is a siren song that can only mean the destruction of all that we cherish as being human. -- Murray Rothbard It is perfectly legitimate to assume that the races are different in their cognitive abilities and in their willpower and accordingly are unequally suited for the task of setting up societies, and that the better races are characterized in particular by their special ability to strengthen social bonds. -- Ludwig von Mises |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||