[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: What happens when it gets cold and there isn't enough energy?
Source: examiner.com
URL Source: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x- ... d-and-there-isnt-enough-energy
Published: Sep 10, 2009
Author: Kirtland Griffin
Post Date: 2009-09-10 15:11:02 by farmfriend
Ping List: *Agriculture-Environment*     Subscribe to *Agriculture-Environment*
Keywords: None
Views: 671
Comments: 45

What happens when it gets cold and there isn't enough energy?

September 9, 10:32 PM
New Haven County Environmental Policy Examiner
Kirtland Griffin

Seems that every day you read about how successful the environmentalists have been at stopping a coal fired plant, a hydroelectric dam, or a nuclear reactor in favor of unreliable wind and solar power. This brings up a serious question, one that I would like to hear an answer from the enviros, politicians and others who are either preventing the building of these facilities or profiting from the alternatives. This would, of course, include our Connecticut governor and the entire Connecticut legislature that unanimously passed the climate bill requiring an 80% cut in carbon emissions by 2050. Throw in the entire Department of Environmental Protection while we are at it. They too are complicit.

The scenario is that the Sun, as it proceeds toward the barycenter of the solar system, and slows to half its former velocity, with a fraction of its former intensity, will result in the predictions you have read here of a long deep cold spell. Some say the spell could last 30 years. Others have predicted 100 years and at least one has suggested 300 years is not out of the question and maybe even more. If this scenario plays out in concert with the environmentalists penchant for stopping every new source of power, other than wind, solar and bio-fuels, there is an extreme likelihood we will not have sufficient power to heat our homes and power our factories. There will be shortages of critical commodities. Farming will be out of the question in most of the temperate areas. Food shortages will be everywhere and starving people, and animals too, will be common even in the most affluent countries. It won't necessarily be about money. There won't be any food. There won't be any energy. There won't be any warmth, period!

So the question I ask of all these people who played on our fears of man-made global warming and duped the public into accepting these draconian measures for a scam, supported by the scantiest of nebulous evidence, perpetrated, at least in a significant part, by the UN, is this. When the power sources that could have been built, but for your inane scheme, are not available along with the power that they would have produced, and will all of you self righteous opportunists who sold your souls to the UN step aside and allow those who played no part in the scam to have the available power and food? I think all we know the answer to that question. Fat Chance!

But don't worry. They'll take care of you.

And that's what I am worried about. Subscribe to *Agriculture-Environment*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#6. To: farmfriend, SonOfLiberty, randge (#0)

Seems that every day you read about how successful the environmentalists have been at stopping a coal fired plant, a hydroelectric dam, or a nuclear reactor in favor of unreliable wind and solar power.

If a free human being doesn't want a coal fired power plant to rain down mercury in their area, or a hydroelectric dam build to destroy their river, or a nuclear reactor that will leak and cause birth defects, then that is your fault.

Instead of attacking those with whom you disagree like puppets pulling your own strings, why don't you get a clue and do something about the Millitary Industrial Complex that is hiding the technology that could free US ALL!

You people are selfish jerks and make me want to join the NWO in putting you into cattle cars.

Clitora  posted on  2009-09-10   15:42:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Clitora (#6)

You expect me to answer you, after you just called me a selfish jerk and proclaimed that you want to put me into a cattle car?

If you want civil discussion, you're going to have to try it the non-Obama way, and start out conversations with me in a civil manner.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-09-10   15:44:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: SonOfLiberty (#7)

You expect me to answer you, after you just called me a selfish jerk and proclaimed that you want to put me into a cattle car?

If you want civil discussion, you're going to have to try it the non-Obama way, and start out conversations with me in a civil manner.

Well, that just don't make no sense.

So you want me to kiss your ass (and tell you your shit don't stink) but yet you want me to try it the "non-obama way"?

You are confused, obviously.

Clitora  posted on  2009-09-10   15:49:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Clitora (#9)

It makes perfect sense.

I made one post on the thread, that was a joke (and clearly so).

You respond by calling me (and others) selfish jerks that you'd like to round up and put in cattle cars.

Simply posing your question without the sneering insults is not "kissing my ass", and you know it. Grow up, learn to interact with others like a mature adult, or you're on bozo. Fair warning.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-09-10   15:51:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: SonOfLiberty (#10)

So, I take it NONE OF YOU can actually debate anything, but instead would rather satisfy yourself by whining (while excusing yourself from having to be intellectually honest).

Makes sense.

Clitora  posted on  2009-09-10   16:06:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Clitora (#12)

Being intellectually honest does not mean you have to call names or make ad hominem attacks as your initial post to any given forum member.

And you know it.

Your assertions about the "military industrial complex", are bogus, there is no secret super duper technology that they as a group of hundreds of thousand could keep secret for any length of time, the group of people is too vast for that level of security to hold credibly. There is simply nothing to debate. However, if you'd tried being something other than shrill, you might have gotten that answer sooner.

If you find that intellectual honesty requires name calling and sneering to somebody who has said nothing to you or against you on a thread, then you'll profit better to address somebody other than me. I've had it with your kind, and frankly, am not wont to give you folks the benefit of the doubt any longer. Grow up, or be ignored by an ever increasing number of your intended audience.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-09-10   16:12:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: SonOfLiberty (#13)

are bogus, there is no secret super duper technology that they as a group of hundreds of thousand could keep secret for any length of time, the group of people is too vast for that level of security to hold credibly.

Your opinion stated as fact does not make it so. I know you and your ilk don't like to be challenged (intellectually) that much, but at least fake it for your followers.lol

Clitora  posted on  2009-09-10   16:16:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Clitora (#19)

I am beginning to think, you remind me of a poster on NPR's site..

Refinersfire  posted on  2009-09-10   16:45:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

        There are no replies to Comment # 25.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]