See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: Nation's Bottomfeeders Gather In D.C. For Teabagger Rallies
Source:
AlaskaReport.com
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 13, 2009
Author: AlaskaReport.com
Post Date: 2009-09-13 01:52:20 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 3935
Comments: 165
"Teabaggers" from around the nation gathered in Washington D.C. Saturday to protest what they believe is a bigger government and health care reform. Tens of thousands of people marched to the U.S. Capitol on Saturday, carrying signs with slogans such as "Obamacare makes me sick" as they protested the president's health care plan and what they say is out-of-control spending. The line of protesters spread across Pennsylvania Avenue for blocks, all the way to the capitol, according to the D.C. Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency. People were chanting "enough, enough" and "We the People." Others yelled "You lie, you lie!" and "Pelosi has to go," referring to California congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. In Battle Creek, Michigan, a woman in her 60s says, "I really don't want to be a guinea pig for the experiment they have with the population control." In Canton, Ohio, a woman argues with an Obama supporter: "He's going after our kids to try to indoctrinate them into a national defense army." The Tea Party Express tour has been free of violence, but occasional outbursts of vitriolic hatred toward the president combined with some menacing outward appearances often overshadow the more moderate tea partyers. In Louisville, Kentucky, two young men in camouflage fatigues roamed the crowd trying to recruit new members for their militia called the Ohio Valley Freedom Fighters. They bear signs reading "AK-47s: today's pitchfork" and "Quit worrying. Start your militia training today." In Jackson, Michigan, a young man didn't need a sign. He was carrying the real thing: A loaded AK-47 assault rifle and two loaded handguns. "I don't want a revolution. I don't want a civil war," he said. "But it is a possibility. It's there as an option, as a last resort." For the rest of the story go here
Teabaggers armed with cardboard signs displayed their racism, ignorance, and bigotry
From the AP:
From CNN:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 35.
#7. To: Brian S (#0)
I think it was around 30 million or so worldwide who protested Chimp I's preemptive war on Iraq. Yeah, that really worked. Chimpy backed off and said, "Whoa! The people aren't in favor of this. Never mind."
Sam, if you'll recall the Declaration of Independence was written to express the numerous complaints of oppression that were ignored. When it became apparent that the "KING" wasn't interested in the peaceful approach, a war ensued. We're moving in the same direction. And, your continuous support for this communist asshat in the White House is beneath your intellect.
The people on this site, generally speaking, believe those who do not wish Obama dead SUPPORT him. This is one reason I am gradually weaning myself from the site. The inability to label his ideology correctly is also embarrassing. He is more of a fascist than a communist. Wall Streeters aren't communists. They're the ones who put him in office.
Really, didn't Wall Street finance Lenin and Trotsky (Ulyinov and Braunstein) ... they were communists ! My remarks aren't intended to support party politics, rather to end them. The 2 Party paradigm is a bad habit that appears hard to break. Bush did it - Obama did it ... it's all bullshit and we're buying it by the boatload as a society. ENUF
In this country, Wall Street doesn't finance communists. Communism, by its very nature, does not allow a market economy. It is all about the power of the label. That's why people mislabel Obama. They perceive, probably accurately, that the 50 years of Cold War indoctrination rendered people more likely to react in Pavlovian fashion to that label than to the more accurate "fascist" label. Only the World War II generation was indoctrinated against fascists. I haven't studied it that closely, but I would imagine the Bolsheviks obtained financing from, specifically, the Jews on Wall Street because of the perceived anti-Semitism of Tsarist Russia. I believe the so-called "forged" Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion called for/predicted such a revolution. Most of you, except for Flintlock, who is a loyal Pubbie, for sure, and maybe even a paid poster a la Badeye (he may even BE Badeye except for the fact he never "GRINS") have written that you see no difference in the two parties and yet there was not NEARLY the venom against Cheney-Bush as I've seen on here against Obama.
You got that bass ackwards.
Where were you when we cheered Chavez for calling Bush Diablo? Or when we all
demanded he be dragged to the Hague for war crimes? I could go on and on, but
it's a lost cause. It's inbetweeners like you and BS who fail to see the
communists (Van Jones) who surround Him, *EVEN* when they identify themselves
as such. If you're going to wean yourself from here, be quick about it. You
embarrass the great name you post by.
Stop avoiding the question...why was Ron Paul not there?
only Ron Paul could answer your question. we'd like to know the answer to that too.
We all know the answer. Trotski memo, remember???? Paul on his knees vowed undying faith to his beloved republican party. He was the systems third party stalking horse and led millions down the primrose path. Note his son is running and a pub, not an independent?????
There are no replies to Comment # 35. End Trace Mode for Comment # 35.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#8. To: Sam Houston (#7)
#9. To: noone222 (#8)
#10. To: Sam Houston (#9)
Wall Streeters aren't communists. They're the ones who put him in office.
#26. To: noone222 (#10)
#27. To: Sam Houston (#26)
yet there was not NEARLY the venom against Cheney-Bush as I've
seen on here against Obama.
#29. To: Jethro Tull (#27)
#33. To: robnoel (#29)
#35. To: christine (#33)
only Ron Paul could answer your question. we'd like to know the answer to that too.
Replies to Comment # 35.