See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: Open Letter To Glenn Beck By Alex Jones
Source:
Prison Planet
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 16, 2009
Author: Alex Jones
Post Date: 2009-09-16 19:58:28 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 513
Comments: 19
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 Alex Jones has addressed Glenn Beck in the form of an open letter, appealing to him to “be on the right side of history” by using his growing public platform to tell the truth rather than exploiting it to deceive grass-roots conservatives and libertarians into following a re-birth of the neo-con agenda that Beck has embraced all along. —————————————— Glenn Beck, It is important to preface this letter by highlighting the fact that I do not attack people lightly and have defended you in the past when Van Jones was calling for you to be fired. I fully support your right to free speech. It cannot be denied that you – Glenn Beck – are an extremely talented radio and television host and you have a magnetism and a proficiency of public speaking that draws people in and maintains their interest. However, being a novice history buff I am also painfully aware of the fact that Benedict Arnold was, like you, a talented individual – he was also a traitor. History is what matters and being on the right side of history is what’s important when it comes to the legacy we leave on this planet. You don’t want people to look back on you as a Benedict Arnold, as a traitor to America. You don’t want people to look back on you as a media whore, as playing the role of being loyal opposition to sucker legitimate and growing grass roots opposition to the new world order. Your agenda is to put out a dual message – to discredit and polarize the conservative movement to the benefit of the establishment left and the elite. Your bizarre and clownish antics of fake crying, which you proved were staged when you replicated them on demand for a GQ photo shoot, are doing nothing but reinforcing the stereotype that the conservative right is insane. Your entire 9/12 project has nothing to do with uniting America and everything to do with reinforcing neo-conservative rhetoric about how we should relinquish our rights and accept the police state because terrorists want to attack us and Saddam Hussein has WMD’s and yellowcake. As the video below illustrates, despite the fact that you claim to be “a Libertarian at heart,” you have publicly supported programs and legislation that are universally abhorred by the vast majority of libertarians, such as the banker bailout and the USA Patriot Act. During your Monday September 22 2008 TV broadcast, you expressed your vehement support for the bailout, stating, “The $700 billion dollars that you’re hearing about now is not only I believe necessary, it is also not nearly enough.” However, as soon as Bush left office and Obama picked up the baton and continued the same financial policy, you changed your tune and routinely attacked the bailout as an example of how socialism was taking over America. The bailout was bad news for America under Bush just as it is under Obama, both were merely performing a transfer of wealth from America to offshore banks and giving the Federal Reserve total dictatorial control over the economy, but you only opposed it when Bush was out of office, proving that your opinions are not wedded to right or wrong, but to which puppet is in the White House. A host of mainline conservative talking heads opposed the banker bailout, as did the majority of the American people, but you went on television and publicly supported it. This is irreconcilable with you being “a libertarian at heart” as you claim. In addition, you aggressively attacked Ron Paul and his supporters during the election campaign when it looked like the Texan Congressman might have a real chance of winning the nomination. You implied that Ron Paul supporters were domestic terrorists and should be dealt with by the U.S. Army, but later tried to side with Ron Paul supporters when the infamous and discredited MIAC report echoed your own talking point that people who support Ron Paul were dangerous. The smear came during a November 2007 show when you were still hosting on CNN. Yourself and ex-Marxist David Horowitz smeared Ron Paul supporters, libertarians and the anti-war left as terrorist sympathizers and inferred that the U.S. military should be used to silence them, parroting a talking point that traces back to a September 2006 White House directive. When asked about the issue, Ron Paul dismissed you as “pretty discourteous” and a “demagogue”. (ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW) You Glenn Beck have acted as a cheerleader for the wars of aggression launched since 9/11 and in addition called for Iran to be attacked, claiming that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is preparing a “second holocaust.” Once again, these political opinions stand completely contrary to libertarian principles, which follow the founding fathers’ view that an expansionist aggressive foreign policy is bad for America. You have attacked Obama for unraveling the Bush war machine to give you left cover, when in fact Obama has done everything in his power to expand Bush’s wars, beefing the campaigns in Afghanistan and Pakistan while removing a token amount of troops from Iraq and replacing them with an even greater number of contractors. By attacking Obama for being different to Bush, when in reality he offers not change whatsoever, you keep people locked in the left-right paradigm and ensure that instead of coming to the realization that the whole system is rigged, they will merely vote in another puppet for the new world order in 2012. Glenn Beck – you are controlled opposition, you are there to co-opt and ensure the Tea Parties are under control and that they never focus on taking on the real power behind the American economy – the Federal Reserve. Bearing in mind that you almost died not too long ago, wouldn’t you rather come to the end of your life, whether that be in one year or 30 years from now, knowing that you stood up for true liberty and freedom? Isn’t that more valuable than your $50 million dollars a year contract? When I was approached ten years ago and offered large sums of money every year to sell out and become what you are today – the new Rush Limbaugh – while accepting tight controls on what I could and could not discuss – I said no and I thank God every day that I made the right decision. I appeal to you directly Glenn – think twice about what you are doing, think twice about what you are a part of right now. Try to do what you can to redeem yourself and don’t be a Benedict Arnold, don’t be a traitor that takes legions of good-natured but hoodwinked people down the rat hole with you as America collapses because those who had voices and platforms used them to deceive and distract rather than tell the truth. Alex Jones Watch Alex Jones’ video address to Glenn Beck which was made during his radio show yesterday. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
#1. To: Brian S (#0)
Pot - Kettle - black
you honestly think Alex Jones is equal to Glenn Beck?
I used to listen to the Derry Brownfield show late at night, and quite often I would hear an hour or more of Alex Jones while waiting for Derry. I haven't listened to Alex Jones for over five years now. He had some good points but it was frequently buried in a lot of nuttiness (people that stand in the street with a bullhorn yelling "we are not your slave" tend to lose credibility and don't tend to accomplish much other than rallying like minds). Glenn Beck is scoring some good points right now but quite honestly, I don't have much faith that he is going to finish what he has started. I don't think he is stable and tends to go off on goofy tangents. I'm afraid too many people are following him like he is some kind of messiah. I am really afraid that at some point, he's going to go off his nut and discredit everything he has accomplished to that point.
I think he was going a bit far a while back, at least for a traditionalist conservative audience. I happened to watch his show today and I couldn't help but admire how he handled Carter's accusations of racism and the ACORN stuff. Beck is on a roll and he's moving the goalposts of what you can say on TV in America. He directly confronts political correctness and does it pretty flawlessly. He really has a great talent for this and he's obviously been working hard on his message and his presentation skills. He has some acting talent as well.
I agree with all that. I've been watching Beck on TV but I only started to listen to him on the radio yesterday. He has a better radio program by far than either Jones or Limbaugh. It is Beck's presentation of the Acorn films that is finally giving that organization the exposure it deserves. He has done more than anyone else to push back the tyranny of political correctness. I'm just concerned that because he puts a lot of his own emotionalism into the program, at some point he may discredit himself in such a way that he takes the whole effort down with him.
Count on it. His appearance on the national scene coincided with another psyop, 9/11. Prior to that he had an afternoon slot (following Rush) on WFLA 970 AM in Tampa. My impressions of him at the time were that he was (is) a weak, sniveling bitch. He cried on the air numerous times. And I lost count of how often he "opened up about" his serious cocaine problems earlier in his DJ career. He was "chosen" to become another false messiah. The timing was precise. He carries himself now with the false bravado that comes from being backed by the financial elite. His function is to mislead and shepherd the flock back into the pen. Anyone who places their faith in this phony will be disappointed and further disillusioned.
There are no replies to Comment # 19. End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Sonovademocrat (#1)
#7. To: christine (#3)
(Edited)
#9. To: Sonovademocrat (#7)
Glenn Beck is scoring some good points right now but quite honestly, I don't have much faith that he is going to finish what he has started. I don't think he is stable and tends to go off on goofy tangents. I'm afraid too many people are following him like he is some kind of messiah. I am really afraid that at some point, he's going to go off his nut and discredit everything he has accomplished to that point.
#14. To: TooConservative (#9)
(Edited)
#19. To: Sonovademocrat (#14)
I'm just concerned that because he puts a lot of his own emotionalism into the program, at some point he may discredit himself in such a way that he takes the whole effort down with him.
Replies to Comment # 19.