See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Molten Metal at Ground Zero
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 16, 2009
Author: YouTube
Post Date: 2009-09-16 20:28:39 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 4839
Comments: 43
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
#1. To: Turtle, *9-11* (#0)
.
It cracks me up you cannot tell a Photoshopped picture.
“No amount of reason, evidence, logic or rational argument will ever convince the true believer of the Official Conspiracy Fairy Tale® otherwise.”
Mission Impossible.
The picture of "molten metal" pouring from the jaws is Photoshopped. Look it up. Suffering from cognitive dissonance from having you fantasy bubbles burst?
Still trying to ignore the fact you're so stupid you fell for a Photoshopped picture?
What makes you think it was photoshopped?
Turdle could do better than "Still trying to ignore the fact you're so stupid you fell for a Photoshopped picture?" which is just lame. Why doesn't he take the trouble to read a referenced piece like the one wudidiz posted and make some kind of thoughtful response grounded in substance? Workers Reported Molten Metal in Ground Zero Rubble References 1. Fire Power: It Took Three Lawyers to Stop the Destruction of CDI Inc., The Daily Record, 10/7/00 I'll tell you why he never addresses issues: Turdle is just to damned lazy. He wouldn't lift a finger to make a cogent argument, and probably wouldn't know one if he saw one. Perversely, he does provide the service of keeping some issues front and center in a blithering sort of way.
#20. To: randge, TwentyTwelve, Critter, all, *9-11* (#17)
Please see #16. It's not available on youtube.
yeah, Turtle, why don't you?
That would require him to think outside of his conditioning and that hurts too much. Of course one could easily ask: Was the photoshopped image a planted piece of disinformation to create a debunking reference? Kind of like the "authoritative" piece of Strawman reasoning, and dishonest imagery , that was printed in Popular Mechanics? (They used a flipped image of WTC 6, which suffered very extensive fired damage but did not collapse, and misrepresented the WTC 6 photos as fires in WTC 7 which did collapse. Hint: the fires in WTC 7 were much smaller than those in WTC 6 which did not collapse.) "Gosh, the goobermunt wouldn't do that, create a disinformation video, would they Wally?" "Uh, grow up Beav." So, we have multiple eyewitness reports and videos on one side, and one possibly photoshopped disinfo video on the other. Gee, what she believe? Turdle or the evidence?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: wudidiz (#1)
#3. To: Turtle (#2)
#5. To: Critter (#3)
“No amount of reason, evidence, logic or rational argument will ever convince the true believer of the Official Conspiracy Fairy Tale® otherwise.”
#7. To: TwentyTwelve, Critter (#5)
#9. To: Turtle (#7)
#11. To: wudidiz (#9)
#12. To: Turtle (#11)
Still trying to ignore the fact you're so stupid you fell for a Photoshopped picture?
#17. To: wudidiz, turdle (#12)
2. D-Day: NY Sanitation Workers' Challenge of a Lifetime, WasteAge.com, 4/1/02 [cached]
3. Handheld app eased recovery tasks, GCN.com, 9/11/02 [cached]
4. Recovery worker reflects on months spent at Ground Zero, Messenger- Inquirer.com, 6/29/02 [cached]
5. The Chaplain's Tale, RecordOnline.com, [cached]
6. Mobilizing Public Health, Johns Hopkins Public Health Magazine, [cached]
7. The scene at Ground Zero, NEHA.org, [cached]
8. WTC a Structural Success, SEAU News, , page 3 9. Ground Zero, 12/01 [cached]
10. American Ground, , page 32
11. Unflinching Look Among the Ruins, NYPost.com, 3/3/04
Replies to Comment # 17. Thank you.
#34. To: randge, Turtle (#17)
Why doesn't he take the trouble to read a referenced piece like the one wudidiz posted and make some kind of thoughtful response grounded in substance?
#40. To: randge, wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, Turdle, all (#17)
Turdle could do better than "Still trying to ignore the fact you're so stupid you fell for a Photoshopped picture?" which is just lame. Why doesn't he take the trouble to read a referenced piece like the one wudidiz posted and make some kind of thoughtful response grounded in substance?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.