See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Molten Metal at Ground Zero
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 16, 2009
Author: YouTube
Post Date: 2009-09-16 20:28:39 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 4030
Comments: 43
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41.
#1. To: Turtle, *9-11* (#0)
.
It cracks me up you cannot tell a Photoshopped picture.
“No amount of reason, evidence, logic or rational argument will ever convince the true believer of the Official Conspiracy Fairy Tale® otherwise.”
Mission Impossible.
The picture of "molten metal" pouring from the jaws is Photoshopped. Look it up. Suffering from cognitive dissonance from having you fantasy bubbles burst?
Still trying to ignore the fact you're so stupid you fell for a Photoshopped picture?
What makes you think it was photoshopped?
Turdle could do better than "Still trying to ignore the fact you're so stupid you fell for a Photoshopped picture?" which is just lame. Why doesn't he take the trouble to read a referenced piece like the one wudidiz posted and make some kind of thoughtful response grounded in substance? Workers Reported Molten Metal in Ground Zero Rubble References 1. Fire Power: It Took Three Lawyers to Stop the Destruction of CDI Inc., The Daily Record, 10/7/00 I'll tell you why he never addresses issues: Turdle is just to damned lazy. He wouldn't lift a finger to make a cogent argument, and probably wouldn't know one if he saw one. Perversely, he does provide the service of keeping some issues front and center in a blithering sort of way.
That would require him to think outside of his conditioning and that hurts too much. Of course one could easily ask: Was the photoshopped image a planted piece of disinformation to create a debunking reference? Kind of like the "authoritative" piece of Strawman reasoning, and dishonest imagery , that was printed in Popular Mechanics? (They used a flipped image of WTC 6, which suffered very extensive fired damage but did not collapse, and misrepresented the WTC 6 photos as fires in WTC 7 which did collapse. Hint: the fires in WTC 7 were much smaller than those in WTC 6 which did not collapse.) "Gosh, the goobermunt wouldn't do that, create a disinformation video, would they Wally?" "Uh, grow up Beav." So, we have multiple eyewitness reports and videos on one side, and one possibly photoshopped disinfo video on the other. Gee, what she believe? Turdle or the evidence?
You always post good stuff. Thanks for the instructive tidbit on Popular Mechanics. They are clever "mechanics" when it comes to facts, ain't they?
#42. To: randge, wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, Turdle, all (#41)
(Edited)
You're welcome. I forget who first uncovered that whopper, but it was a cute one. Flip an image of WTC 6 upside down, and then misrepresent it as "7" and then claim that it shows that the fires were just hellacious. Of course that they had to do that to prop up the "WTC 7" collapsed from fires story shows just how weak the cover story was and how inadequate the evidence was to try and support it. It is also embarassing to the Official Conspiracy Theory® to even note that WTC 6 suffered much more extensive fire damage than WTC 7 given the heavy demolition they had to do on "6", which just did not want to come down, to "pull it" down later. Yes and no. For the gullible who take the cover legends at face value, and do not compare the Official Fairy Tale® against the other verifiable evidence, it works, but in the age of the Internet with thousands of people pouring over the accounts and evidence it gets rather difficult for them. Every time the elite criminals try the big lie they get caught, and every time they get caught that lessens the weight of the next lie which costs them a few more sheeple as more wake up to reality. Turdle of course being the massive jeenyus that he is is immune to the allure of logic and facts and so is thoroughly secure in his invincible ignorance.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: wudidiz (#1)
#3. To: Turtle (#2)
#5. To: Critter (#3)
“No amount of reason, evidence, logic or rational argument will ever convince the true believer of the Official Conspiracy Fairy Tale® otherwise.”
#7. To: TwentyTwelve, Critter (#5)
#9. To: Turtle (#7)
#11. To: wudidiz (#9)
#12. To: Turtle (#11)
Still trying to ignore the fact you're so stupid you fell for a Photoshopped picture?
#17. To: wudidiz, turdle (#12)
2. D-Day: NY Sanitation Workers' Challenge of a Lifetime, WasteAge.com, 4/1/02 [cached]
3. Handheld app eased recovery tasks, GCN.com, 9/11/02 [cached]
4. Recovery worker reflects on months spent at Ground Zero, Messenger- Inquirer.com, 6/29/02 [cached]
5. The Chaplain's Tale, RecordOnline.com, [cached]
6. Mobilizing Public Health, Johns Hopkins Public Health Magazine, [cached]
7. The scene at Ground Zero, NEHA.org, [cached]
8. WTC a Structural Success, SEAU News, , page 3 9. Ground Zero, 12/01 [cached]
10. American Ground, , page 32
11. Unflinching Look Among the Ruins, NYPost.com, 3/3/04
#40. To: randge, wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, Turdle, all (#17)
Turdle could do better than "Still trying to ignore the fact you're so stupid you fell for a Photoshopped picture?" which is just lame. Why doesn't he take the trouble to read a referenced piece like the one wudidiz posted and make some kind of thoughtful response grounded in substance?
#41. To: Original_Intent (#40)
Replies to Comment # 41. Thanks for the instructive tidbit on Popular Mechanics.
They are clever "mechanics" when it comes to facts, ain't they?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 41.