[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Study finds poor toddlers often spanked by age 1
Source: Montery Herald
URL Source: http://www.montereyherald.com/health/ci_13356418
Published: Sep 17, 2009
Author: MELISSA HEALY
Post Date: 2009-09-29 13:43:06 by Prefrontal Vortex
Keywords: None
Views: 283
Comments: 13

Study finds poor toddlers often spanked by age 1


By MELISSA HEALY
Los Angeles Times
Updated: 09/17/2009 01:44:15 AM PDT

There's no topic more incendiary than spanking. Add to that the spanking of very young children by mothers in minority, low-income households, and you have a minefield.

A group of Duke University researchers has not only ventured into that minefield, it has set off a few bombs in the process. Published in this month's issue of the journal Child Development, their study of 2,573 toddlers enrolled in Head Start found that for poor children, early and frequent spanking — by the age of 1 — is not only very common, but it also makes their behavior at age 2 more aggressive and by age 3 appears to have slowed their socio-emotional development.

They also found that a low-income mother is most likely to start spanking a very fussy, irritable baby by the age of 1, and more likely still if the mother is depressed. Boys were spanked and yelled at more often than girls, and the poorer the family the greater the likelihood the kids would be physically and verbally punished at an early age.

The collective results suggest that the causes and effects of spanking are tightly bound together, making it difficult to tease out the influence of poverty, genetics, gender differences and cultural expectations when discussing the controversial practice.

Not recommended

The American Academy of Pediatrics in 1998 issued a recommendation that parents find means to correct children's behavior other than corporal punishment. A large body of evidence suggests the practice is seldom effective and may have negative effects.

But some in the black community have defended the practice, citing research showing that while spanking may make white children more aggressive, the practice makes black children less so.

How common is it for low-income mothers to have spanked their children by the age of 1? One in three mothers told researchers that they or someone in their household had spanked their 1-year-old in the preceding week, on average doling out 2½ spankings per week. By the time their children were 2 and 3, 49 percent of the moms in the study said they had spanked the child in the last week — on average between 2½ and three times.

Verbal punishment was less frequent than spanking: Seventeen percent of the mothers surveyed said they had yelled at a 1-year-old; 24 percent yelled at their 2-year-old, and 16 percent at their 3-year-old.

Spanking among ethnic groups

After stripping out the influence of income, black children at all three ages were most likely to be spanked and to be verbally punished. Low-income white mothers and Mexican-American mothers who were more Americanized were about equally likely to spank their young children, and generally about equally likely to yell at the toddlers. Recently arrived Mexican-American moms were least likely to spank a toddler, and less likely to verbally punish a 2-year-old than were other low-income moms.

The study's findings generally "paint a picture of spanking and verbal punishments as products of parental challenges (e.g., the many difficulties associated with being a young parent and/or living in poverty), and may also reflect a goal of preparing a child for a life characterized by these and other challenges," the authors write.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#1. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)

But some in the black community have defended the practice, citing research showing that while spanking may make white children more aggressive, the practice makes black children less so.

And just why is such research not cited? Huh?

Because it doesn't exist, is my best guess.

Lod  posted on  2009-09-29   14:25:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Lod (#1)

Toward a Developmental/Contextual Model of the Effects of Parental Spanking on Children's Aggression. 1997-08-00

Institutions: Child Trends, Inc., Washington, DC.
Sponsors: National Inst. of Child Health and Human Development (NIH), Bethesda, MD.

Researchers who employ contextual models of parenting contend that it is not spanking per se, but rather the context in which spanking occurs and the meanings children ascribe to spanking, that predict child outcomes. This study proposed two plausible meanings that children may ascribe to spanking--a legitimate expression of parental authority or an act of interpersonal aggression--and hypothesized that to the degree that spanking is perceived as the former, it will not foster child aggression. It also proposed that children's espousal of one or the other of these meanings is a function of both cultural norms and the nature of the family hierarchy. Using data from 1,112 children ages 4 through 11 from the National Survey of Families and Households, the study tested the hypotheses that the association between the frequency of spanking and subsequent child aggression would be stronger for older versus younger children, boys versus girls, whites versus blacks, and single-mother versus mother-father families. Results from structural equation models of main effects indicated significant group differences in children's self-reported fighting by age and race. Spanking predicted fewer fights for children ages 4 to 7 and for blacks, and more fights for children ages 8 to 11 and for whites. The study also tested a model wherein a positive association between spanking and aggression emerges at younger ages for boys, whites, and children in single-mother homes. These attributes were employed as proxies for lower levels of parental control and/or control maintained through punitive means. Investigations of potential interactions between age, gender, race, and family structure using ordinary least squares regression yielded the earliest and strongest positive associations between spanking and fighting for white boys in single-mother homes. (Contains 15 references.) (Author/EV)

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-09-29   15:45:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#3)

Institutions: Child Trends, Inc., Washington, DC.

Sponsors: National Inst. of Child Health and Human Development (NIH), Bethesda, MD.

I trust nothing from deecee or .gov.

But thanks for finding their study.

Lod  posted on  2009-09-29   15:56:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Lod (#4)

There are others. From nospank.net:

"Over the years, studies have consistently demonstrated that spanking results in a host of long-term, negative consequences. The spanking research is so compelling that the American Academy of Pediatrics cautions against spanking. But some researchers have maintained that the effects of spanking depend upon its familial, community, and cultural context.

In the May [2004] Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, a study headed by Jennifer Lansford of Duke University finds that, while white children who were spanked exhibit more aggressive behavior as young teens, African American children who were spanked actually exhibit less aggressive behavior.

Lansford cites a 2002 metanalysis of spanking studies by Elizabeth Gershoff in the July 2002 Psychological Bulletin. It associates spanking with 10 undesirable outcomes, including increased aggression, less internalization of moral precepts, a greater chance of becoming a victim of physical abuse later in life, and decreased mental health. In fact, the Gershoff study cites only one positive outcome for spanking: it gets immediate compliance.

In her study, Lansford speculates that European Americans may associate spanking with parental loss of control, anger, and aggression, while African Americans may associate it with a legitimate parental expression of authority and training. A white child who’s spanked regularly and lives in a community where spanking is frowned upon, Lansford says, may grow up feeling angry, ashamed, or flawed, while a black child whose peers are also spanked may suffer none of those negative effects."

Gershoff, anti-white Jew that she is, probably is not correctly interpreting her own results. She can't, really.

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-09-29   16:16:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#6)

...white children who were spanked exhibit more aggressive behavior as young teens, African American children who were spanked actually exhibit less aggressive behavior.

Maybe whitey ain't whackin' 'em hard enough.

Esso  posted on  2009-09-29   18:01:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

#11. To: Esso (#10)

More like feeding 'em too much.

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2009-09-29 18:11:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]