[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy?

Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days


Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Georgia Judge Fines 'Birther' Lawyer Orly Taitz $20,000
Source: Politics Daily
URL Source: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/1 ... ther-lawyer-orly-taitz-20-000/
Published: Oct 13, 2009
Author: Politics Daily
Post Date: 2009-10-13 12:22:29 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 3483
Comments: 40

Orly Taitz, the California lawyer known for her vocal and litigious leadership in the "birther" movement, has been slapped with a $20,000 fine by a District Court in Georgia for "wasting the Defendants' time" in a case one of her clients brought against the U.S. Army. The court ruled that Taitz violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which stipulates that attorneys will not sign onto cases that are clearly brought with dishonest or frivolous motives.

The case, in which Army Capt. Connie Rhodes sought a restraining order for her pending deployment to Iraq on grounds that President Obama is not a valid commander in chief, was part of Taitz's nationwide legal campaign to prove that Obama was not born in the United States. The court's decision, excerpted by the Washington Independent, says the suit was brought in "bad faith," and calls Taitz's legal conduct "willful and not merely negligent."

"Counsel's frivolous and sanctionable conduct wasted the Defendants' time and valuable judicial resources that could have been devoted to legitimate cases pending with the Court," the judge wrote in the decision.

The Rhodes case was dismissed on Sept. 16. with an opinion that hinted at the court's displeasure with Taitz. It took a strange turn just days after that ruling, when Rhodes claimed she had never given Taitz permission to request a stay in her name, and said she was filing a complaint against Taitz with the California bar.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

has been slapped with a $20,000 fine by a District Court in Georgia for "wasting the Defendants' time"

That needs to be contested and fought vigorously.

It's fine to disagree. The law should never penalize somebody for bringing forth a suit that they feel is justified.

This punishment smacks of overt political censorship of opinions contrary to the sitting administration.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   12:24:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: SonOfLiberty (#1)

It's fine to disagree. The law should never penalize somebody for bringing forth a suit that they feel is justified.

So if a guy who is on drugs and drunk walks into your yard and trips over your kid's toy Tonka truck and breaks his neck and sues you for $1000000.00 and he feels that is a justified case?? Would you still feel the same?

Massive tort cases are brought forth by lawyers who feel their cases are justified. One reason why you buy a new ladder and you cannot see what color it is because of the 75 safety decals plastered over it.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-10-13   15:10:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: belmontconservative (#12)

The judge is free to toss the case out. Which he should.

Prohibitive fining is little more than retribution.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   15:18:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: SonOfLiberty (#13) (Edited)

Prohibitive fining is little more than retribution.

No, it's a prohibitive measure aimed at others who would emulate Dr. Lawyer Indian Chief types like Oily Taint by wasting the court's time.

Hopefully she's not as bad a dentist as she is a lawyer. People could get hurt.

Actions have consequences. The cost for her stupidity (this time) is $20000.

Samuel Gray  posted on  2009-10-13   15:46:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Samuel Gray (#14)

Right, retribution.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   15:46:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: SonOfLiberty (#15)

I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.

Samuel Gray  posted on  2009-10-13   15:47:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Samuel Gray (#16)

How cute.

Or maybe you don't understand my point of view. It happens sometimes.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   15:49:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: SonOfLiberty (#17)

Your point of view seems to imply that any suit should be heard and if the judge decides it is without merit, he merely tells the party bringing the suit "no, it has no merit, go on your way...", no harm, no foul.

What if the party in question, in this case, "Dr" Taitz, doesn't get a clue and keeps doing the same thing over and over? She should be able to tie everyone's time up countering her silly claims?

There are a finite number of courts. Doing things your way, a few kooks could bring the entire judicial system of the country to a screeching halt, again, without penalty.

Extending your logic, "prohibitive" fines for speeding or running stop signs are "retribution" for you exercising your freedom to break traffic laws, right?

Samuel Gray  posted on  2009-10-13   16:00:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 21.

#22. To: Samuel Gray (#21)

Maybe the judicial system shouldn't be trying so many things due to so many damned laws on the books that have no place there, so that they'd have time to hear from everybody that pays their salary, even the kooks, first. Second, asking for evidence of eligibility is not unreasonable. I don't have a dog in the birther race one way or the other, but I do know that asking a party to prove something is not unreasonable.

This is all silliness. I suspect the judge could have fined this person a million dollars and you'd be defending it.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13 16:03:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Samuel Gray (#21)

Extending your logic, "prohibitive" fines for speeding or running stop signs are "retribution" for you exercising your freedom to break traffic laws, right?

Prohibitive? You bet!

If you fine me twenty thousand dollars for jaywalking or running a stop sign, you're doing nothing but throwing around your governmental weight to "make an example" of me, which is wrong.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13 16:04:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Samuel Gray (#21)

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2009-10-13 16:24:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]