[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel


Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Georgia Judge Fines 'Birther' Lawyer Orly Taitz $20,000
Source: Politics Daily
URL Source: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/1 ... ther-lawyer-orly-taitz-20-000/
Published: Oct 13, 2009
Author: Politics Daily
Post Date: 2009-10-13 12:22:29 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 3523
Comments: 40

Orly Taitz, the California lawyer known for her vocal and litigious leadership in the "birther" movement, has been slapped with a $20,000 fine by a District Court in Georgia for "wasting the Defendants' time" in a case one of her clients brought against the U.S. Army. The court ruled that Taitz violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which stipulates that attorneys will not sign onto cases that are clearly brought with dishonest or frivolous motives.

The case, in which Army Capt. Connie Rhodes sought a restraining order for her pending deployment to Iraq on grounds that President Obama is not a valid commander in chief, was part of Taitz's nationwide legal campaign to prove that Obama was not born in the United States. The court's decision, excerpted by the Washington Independent, says the suit was brought in "bad faith," and calls Taitz's legal conduct "willful and not merely negligent."

"Counsel's frivolous and sanctionable conduct wasted the Defendants' time and valuable judicial resources that could have been devoted to legitimate cases pending with the Court," the judge wrote in the decision.

The Rhodes case was dismissed on Sept. 16. with an opinion that hinted at the court's displeasure with Taitz. It took a strange turn just days after that ruling, when Rhodes claimed she had never given Taitz permission to request a stay in her name, and said she was filing a complaint against Taitz with the California bar.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 36.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

has been slapped with a $20,000 fine by a District Court in Georgia for "wasting the Defendants' time"

That needs to be contested and fought vigorously.

It's fine to disagree. The law should never penalize somebody for bringing forth a suit that they feel is justified.

This punishment smacks of overt political censorship of opinions contrary to the sitting administration.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   12:24:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: SonOfLiberty (#1)

This punishment smacks of overt political censorship of opinions contrary to the sitting administration.

Courts aren't the place to bring your opinions. You're supposed to have facts and be able to back them up.

On that, Orly fails miserably every time she opens her mouth.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-10-13   12:48:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#3)

You don't fine somebody for bringing a case to trial. She thought she had the facts, whether she did or didn't.

Or are you in favor of government punishing anybody who brings up a case against sitting powers?

Christ, what the hell is with partisanship that it makes people blind?

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   12:50:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: SonOfLiberty (#4)

You don't fine somebody for bringing a case to trial. She thought she had the facts, whether she did or didn't.

That isn't what she got fined for.

I suggest you spend some time reading the Scribd documents about this case before going off on a tangent.

Or perhaps your partisanship has made you blind to the antics of the most incompetent lawyer I've ever seen.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-10-13   12:55:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#5)

An incompetent lawyer does not justify punishing a plaintiff with a fine.

The judge could have just let it go and went on with life.

I can see that you approve of punishing unpopular politics. Figures.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   13:04:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: SonOfLiberty (#6)

An incompetent lawyer does not justify punishing a plaintiff with a fine.

The plaintiff is not being fined.

The plaintiff fired Taitz after watching her antics in court.

Taitz is the one being fined, and rightly so.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-10-13   13:25:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#7)

some just can't get there if another doesn't hold their hand and lead them.

IRTorqued  posted on  2009-10-13   13:38:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: IRTorqued (#8)

I was mistaken and admitted as much.

Banner day for the internet at large, somebody admitting that he was in error. I'm glad to have been a part of it.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   13:43:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: SonOfLiberty (#10)

pat yourself on the back.

IRTorqued  posted on  2009-10-13   20:16:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 36.

        There are no replies to Comment # 36.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 36.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]