[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

‘The FBI Set Everything Up… They Wrote the Script – and WHITMER WAS IN ON IT!’

This Is Why Electricity Costs Twice As Much In Britain As In The US

"Day Has Finally Come": Instagram Censors Team USA Rifle Shooter Ahead Of Paris Paralympics

Russiagate cheerleaders, spy agency links: what you need to know about CrowdStrike, the firm behind the global IT outage

Audio Analysis Is 100% Clear: Trump & Crowd Were Shot At By Two Separate People

French government fines prominent news channel for allowing a climate change skeptic to speak unchallenged

Trumps Lead Widens Following His Assassination Attempt: POLL

Disneyland workers say they live in cars and motels due to low pay

Mayorkas CAUGHT LYING Under Oath!! Josh Hawley Brings The Receipts To Expose Him At Hearing!

Biden orders to stage poll on Harris prospects in election race

Federal Prosecutors Begin Dropping Jan. 6 Obstruction Charges After Supreme Court Ruling

Biden Wants Voters To Focus on His Record, But Its Worse Than His Debate Performance

ICJ declares Israeli occupation unlawful, calls for settlements to be evacuated, and for Palestinian reparations

PaGinG DR GaTeS...

Saturday at Library

7 Bizarre Details of Donald Trump’s Assassination Attempt

Emergency Episode: Special Forces Sniper Explains Trump Shooting - Tim Kennedy

Why people think the Trump shooting was a conspiracy | If You’re Listening | ABC NEWS

Bongino POINTS OUT something everyone missed | New Trump Shooting Facts!

John Deere RECALLS 25,000 Riders, FIRES 1,000's of Employees and is MOVING Out of America!!

"We need young MEN to Rise Up Right Now" Globalists are TERRIFIED

Evil Gunwoman Shoots Helpless Baby in Front of His Parents in Philly (VIDEO)

Plunder Theater — Are You Not Entertained? Catherine Austin Fitts

Investment Firm That Allegedly Put Options on 12 Million Trump Stocks Day Before Assassination

Notorious Venezuelan migrant who told other border crossers to squat in US homes 'used to be a SPY'

Netanyahu Blocks Order To Build Field Hospital for Gaza Children

AIPAC is spending big to beat Cori Bush

Yemeni Forces Launch Successful Drone Strike on Central Tel Aviv, Israel: Is the U.S. Navy to Blame?

The F-35 Urgently Needs a New Engine: The Engine Core Upgrade Programs Design Review Highlights Why

More than 200 congressional staffers sign letter protesting Netanyahu address


Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Georgia Judge Fines 'Birther' Lawyer Orly Taitz $20,000
Source: Politics Daily
URL Source: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/1 ... ther-lawyer-orly-taitz-20-000/
Published: Oct 13, 2009
Author: Politics Daily
Post Date: 2009-10-13 12:22:29 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 2175
Comments: 40

Orly Taitz, the California lawyer known for her vocal and litigious leadership in the "birther" movement, has been slapped with a $20,000 fine by a District Court in Georgia for "wasting the Defendants' time" in a case one of her clients brought against the U.S. Army. The court ruled that Taitz violated Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which stipulates that attorneys will not sign onto cases that are clearly brought with dishonest or frivolous motives.

The case, in which Army Capt. Connie Rhodes sought a restraining order for her pending deployment to Iraq on grounds that President Obama is not a valid commander in chief, was part of Taitz's nationwide legal campaign to prove that Obama was not born in the United States. The court's decision, excerpted by the Washington Independent, says the suit was brought in "bad faith," and calls Taitz's legal conduct "willful and not merely negligent."

"Counsel's frivolous and sanctionable conduct wasted the Defendants' time and valuable judicial resources that could have been devoted to legitimate cases pending with the Court," the judge wrote in the decision.

The Rhodes case was dismissed on Sept. 16. with an opinion that hinted at the court's displeasure with Taitz. It took a strange turn just days after that ruling, when Rhodes claimed she had never given Taitz permission to request a stay in her name, and said she was filing a complaint against Taitz with the California bar.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

has been slapped with a $20,000 fine by a District Court in Georgia for "wasting the Defendants' time"

That needs to be contested and fought vigorously.

It's fine to disagree. The law should never penalize somebody for bringing forth a suit that they feel is justified.

This punishment smacks of overt political censorship of opinions contrary to the sitting administration.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   12:24:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: SonOfLiberty (#1)

This punishment smacks of overt political censorship of opinions contrary to the sitting administration.

Courts aren't the place to bring your opinions. You're supposed to have facts and be able to back them up.

On that, Orly fails miserably every time she opens her mouth.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-10-13   12:48:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#3)

You don't fine somebody for bringing a case to trial. She thought she had the facts, whether she did or didn't.

Or are you in favor of government punishing anybody who brings up a case against sitting powers?

Christ, what the hell is with partisanship that it makes people blind?

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   12:50:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: SonOfLiberty (#4)

You don't fine somebody for bringing a case to trial. She thought she had the facts, whether she did or didn't.

That isn't what she got fined for.

I suggest you spend some time reading the Scribd documents about this case before going off on a tangent.

Or perhaps your partisanship has made you blind to the antics of the most incompetent lawyer I've ever seen.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-10-13   12:55:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: IDon'tThinkSo (#5)

An incompetent lawyer does not justify punishing a plaintiff with a fine.

The judge could have just let it go and went on with life.

I can see that you approve of punishing unpopular politics. Figures.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2009-10-13   13:04:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#7. To: SonOfLiberty (#6)

An incompetent lawyer does not justify punishing a plaintiff with a fine.

The plaintiff is not being fined.

The plaintiff fired Taitz after watching her antics in court.

Taitz is the one being fined, and rightly so.

IDon'tThinkSo  posted on  2009-10-13 13:25:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]