[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them

Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson

Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute

ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest

Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music

Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok

Trump wants concealed carry in DC.

Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River

COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS.

Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies

Man attempts to carjack a New Yorker

Test post re: IRS

How Managers Are Using AI To Hire And Fire People


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Were the moon landings faked?
Source: NASA
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK2Fy85VyRg&feature=related
Published: Oct 17, 2009
Author: NASA
Post Date: 2009-10-17 00:54:11 by RickyJ
Keywords: None
Views: 4209
Comments: 171

Watch this video and see if you can tell what is very wrong if this was actually filmed on the moon as NASA says it was.

Hint: It is not the bad dropping, but that is suspect too for supposedly taking place on the moon.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#3. To: RickyJ (#0)

I give up. If it's not the bad dropping, what is it?

wudidiz  posted on  2009-10-17   2:52:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: wudidiz (#3) (Edited)

I give up. If it's not the bad dropping, what is it?

We are told by NASA and scientists that the moon has virtually no atmosphere. With no atmosphere there is nothing to propagate vibrations through space commonly know as sound waves. Yet, you can hear the bag the astronaut is trying to change clear as a bell. This was suppose to be happening on the moon, not Earth. So, it would be impossible to hear such sound with nothing to propgate the vibrations to the astronaut's microphone located next to his mouth. Notice, you don't even hear them breathing, so hearing a bag in a vaccum by only touching it with your gloves would be impossible.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-10-17   4:38:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: RickyJ (#4) (Edited)

Your argument is that the sound of the bag should not be heard because of the vacuum of space. But ....

The bag is a sort of a rucksack attached to the spacesuit of one of the astronauts, so any jiggling of the bag would jiggle his spacesuit and what you are hearing is the rattling of his spacesuit fabric via his own helmet's microphone.

Nothing incongruous about this. By the way, timing the speed of the dropping objects, including the kangaroo hops and the kicked-up dust, shows that they are positively in a much weaker gravity field than on earth.

Shoonra  posted on  2009-10-17   8:19:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Shoonra (#8)

The bag is a sort of a rucksack attached to one of the astronaut's spacesuit, so any jiggling of the back jiggles his spacesuit and what you are hearing is the rattling of his spacesuit fabric via his own helmet's microphone.

True, and see post 7 about the dust.

This video convinces me more that they were indeed on the moon.

Critter  posted on  2009-10-17   8:26:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Critter (#9)

This video convinces me more that they were indeed on the moon.

What I don't understand is we first went to the moon in 9 years...now Nasa say's it will be 15-20 years before we can go back?? Heck all the R&D is done why so long?? Heck dust off the old Saturn 5 blueprints and just build another and throw some new computers on it and go.

belmontconservative  posted on  2009-10-17   8:56:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

#22. To: belmontconservative, Critter (#10)

This video convinces me more that they were indeed on the moon.

What I don't understand is we first went to the moon in 9 years...now Nasa say's it will be 15-20 years before we can go back?? Heck all the R&D is done why so long?? Heck dust off the old Saturn 5 blueprints and just build another and throw some new computers on it and go.

Not only that - we HAD other Saturn V components that could have been assembled into further missions - they were destroyed.

The short answer, along with my reasoning why I believe it to be the case, is that someone (or one's):

A. Do NOT want us venturing back to the moon.

B. We have already been back via the "Black Space Program" of which little tiny snippets have leaked to suggest very strongly that one exists.

Again it goes back to controlling information and thus controlling what people think or can even think about.

As I have commented before the scale of the mind/information control in our current society is simply beyond comprehension for most people - they have been conditioned not to look, ask, or question. This particularly so among those under 40. The control of the schools, and there curriculum, was really only cemented into place in the early to mid 70's.

Going back to other pieces in the puzzle - it is likely that we have had the means to reach the moon, and very likely Mars and the outer planets, since the late 70's. Again it is conjecture based on little snippets I've picked up over time so if asked to prove the conclusion I cannot, but I can justify it.

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-10-17 12:10:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#152. To: belmontconservative (#10)

What I don't understand is we first went to the moon in 9 years...now Nasa say's it will be 15-20 years before we can go back?? Heck all the R&D is done why so long?? Heck dust off the old Saturn 5 blueprints and just build another and throw some new computers on it and go.

If they really went to the moon, they wouldn't have lost the original footage. You just don't lose something like that. Or copy over it. LOL!

I think another nation will really get to the moon before NASA ever does.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-10-21 04:45:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]