See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Were the moon landings faked?
Source:
NASA
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK2Fy85VyRg&feature=related
Published: Oct 17, 2009
Author: NASA
Post Date: 2009-10-17 00:54:11 by RickyJ
Keywords: None
Views: 2842
Comments: 171
Watch this video and see if you can tell what is very wrong if this was actually filmed on the moon as NASA says it was. Hint: It is not the bad dropping, but that is suspect too for supposedly taking place on the moon.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-64) not displayed.
.
.
.
#65. To: Dr_Tron (#45)
No it isn't Dr. Tron. Care to explain how we can hear the bag being rustled but can't hear the thrusters of the lunar landing module? Which do you think produced more vibrations for the space suits of the astronauts? I am not surprised you say you worked for NASA and claim we went to the moon. What else would a person from NASA do? Tell the truth? LOL!
God is always good!
And they shut up pretty quick when Grissom and other astronauts critical of NASA and their claim of working toward getting a man on the moon were killed in "accidents". Good people can be intimidated by fear of death and loved ones to keep quiet. This is how the elite have kept secrets for decades, they control the press and kill those who reveal the truth after they riducule them as crack pots in the press and tarnish their reputations.
God is always good!
Flapdoodle? LOL! Yeah, must be artifacts in the transmissions, how else could NASA exaplain it? Tell the truth. LOL!
God is always good!
No you can't. So why do you lie about the bag not producing the noise when it is clear that is exactly what is happening. Admit the truth, it will do you good. Why live a lie for the rest of your life?
God is always good!
You think the USA governemnt, CIA, Mossad can create such advanced space ships and yet can't even properly carry out a false flag like 9/11? I highly doubt it. They are supremely imcompetent, their only power is fear through intmidation and assainations. Once the "little" people lose their fear of them, their time will be up. Education is the only way. It won't be easy to reverse a lifetime of propaganda and brainwashing in enough people, but it is the only hope to stop them.
God is always good!
deleted
deleted
deleted
And just how does your comment apply to Mr. Original_Intent? He is those things. Something close to that.
I believe that what he said was that the landings were real but some of the supporting material had been faked.
Oh. Just because of his "considered opinion" 'eh?
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
I find OI to be very well read and informed.
Yeah, but outside of his suggestions for and about his own "considered opinions" ... where are those opinions beyond a post stating his own considered opinions? Isn't that a bit like a circle jerk?
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
Sounds like fun.
I have way too much fun on this forum. The intellectual acumen and political alias and silly dogma run wild!
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
LOL OI has done a lot of research into banned archeology. I'm not sure I agree with his ideas on monuments on the moon etc but I don't discount it out of hand either. I have too much respect for him and his IQ to do that plus it is just too plausible.
Are you saying his "considered opinion" is inarguable?
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
they must have left all those rolls of film they shot in the glove box.
LOL no I don't think that is what I said but hey if it works for you...
I believe that what he said was that the landings were real but some of the supporting material had been faked. That is exactly what I said. However, Bucky don't read too well. And it is not a final answer. It is a hypothesis which seems to account for all the data. Some of the photos are undeniably legit. Some of the photos are very questionable. So, the hypothesis is that NASA in order to prevent "disturbing" data into the public domain "dummied" some of the shots. That is what has led to the "Moon Mission was a hoax" i.e., that both camps are right and both are wrong.
"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France
I am confident that is what you meant .... why are you so willing to prostrate yourself at the feet of OI?
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
LOL are you sure it's his feet?
Oh, I see now ... it is his "considered opinion" .... BTW, where is it?
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
I believe that what he said was that the landings were real but some of the supporting material had been faked. That is exactly what I said. However, Bucky don't read too well. And it is not a final answer. It is a hypothesis which seems to account for all the data. Some of the photos are undeniably legit. Some of the photos are very questionable. So, the hypothesis is that NASA in order to prevent "disturbing" data into the public domain "dummied" some of the shots. That is what has led to the "Moon Mission was a hoax" i.e., that both camps are right and both are wrong. Yes, sorry. You didn't say they were fake, you said, well what you said. You come across kinda like you're stoned and just want to give a people a hard time on a Saturday night sometimes, buck. ;-)
He must have something to base his opinion on, but he didn't present any evidence for it. I think our government is a bunch of idiots that can't even get a mulit-year well planned false flag operation to work right. Fooling the vast majority of Americans we went to the moon to keep the taxpayer dollars coming in wouldn't have been too hard for NASA to do considering many Americans thought we were being invaded by martians in a radio broadcast and panicked. People trust their talking heads on TV and radio more than they trust their own two eyes and common sense. That is why Americans are enslaved to the elite bankers of the world. They have way too much trust of established "authority" figures.
God is always good!
I should take the time some day to do up a master reference post from different sites around the web. However, in a nutshell, NASA has been caught "jiggering" photographic data on multiple occasions, and there are some sharp people on the web who have caught them, and have the expertise to show what manipulations were done to the photos. However, not tonight - I'm pooped. I have been doing a stem to stern cleaning of my humble pad and rearranging everything to be more efficient and create more space.
"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France
Where is the data to back-up any of the otherwise publick and scientific recordings being anything other than "fake." Surely, you can offer more than an opinion or a post agreeing with "considered opinion." Then again, maybe not.
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
Hey Bucky? Can you spell ass. Sure you can. See, wasn't that easy?
"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France
Good GOD, ALMIGHTY! It's GOOGLE WARS!!!!!!
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
Organization is the key to efficiency. Good night. buckeroo, if I thought it would be productive I'd post some evidence to you.
deleted
That must be another "considered opinion" right here on this very forum. This is a totally incredible experience that is causing my entire being to say, "yea".
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
Come again good buddy.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" I think he meant they said it negated the 1/6 gravity of the moon. The back packs weighed approx. 100 pounds which would have felt like 16 2/3 pounds on the moon. But, their enitre body weight would have felt like only 1/6 of that on Earth enabling a 200 pound man to feel like a 33 pound man on the moon with the same amount of strength. So, they should have been able to jump very high if they wanted too. They should have been able to push themselves back up with very little effort if they fell down without even using their legs. But, of course they couldn't do that becasue they were on Earth.
God is always good!
And my thought is that no, because they (and they were), in addition to the 100 lb back packs, in highly constrictive - pondorous even, pressure suits. Not gym shorts. I do so understand your skeptcticism. Seeins as the gov has been so quick to lie on many issues. In my POV, yes the gov. needs a internal revolution, an external revolution if that doesn't work, but for all that the US put several ships on the moon and Kudos for us for that accomplishment. Kennedy was a coverup - the Moon landing was not. Wheather or not it was worth it is a different ?. The US spent itself to death in Vietnam during this same time. Some historians say that the US moon shot shocked the world that the USA could have achieved such a race remarkable event, as in human race, event- that it was worth the billions invested. I don't know - IIRC the US was fighting a flawed war in Vietnam at the time.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" The evidence says the moon landings were fake. It took me a long time to accept this, but I can't ignore the evidence anymore. No man went to the moon, then, or since then.
God is always good!
ROTFL .. RickyJ .. get a life.
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
Not only that we people are curious creatures in that we feel more comfortable in an orderly environment and when it is disorderly seek to bring order - except for those poor individuals who are pscyotic. I find that I am more productive in an orderly environment simply because it eliminates the dissonance of disorder. It creates a feeling of stability. Concur. Bucky is just interested in being obstreperous. Evidence is merely a distraction to be ignored. It conflicts with his preferred world view and so makes his head hurt. He doesn't want to be confused with the facts.
"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't. ~ Anatole France
I haven't had an opportunity to view your "considered opinion" just yet. When is this information going to be made publick beyond the fact that you think the moon landings were faked?
“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”
Comments (106 - 171) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestUmmm... No. Everything you see is consistent with a lunar landing.
#66. To: Original_Intent (#35)
So, and I think it likely, that those capsules had more radiation shielding than was let on. Doing the entire Moon Program by fraud would have been virtually impossible. Too many really really bright people, and ethical ones, were on the inside.
#67. To: Dr_Tron (#42)
(Edited)
Flapdoodle. You are hearing artifacts in the audio transmissions.
#68. To: Dr_Tron (#42)
Can’t violate physics
#69. To: Original_Intent (#35)
#70. To: christine (#40)
#71. To: Dr_Tron (#43)
#72. To: Dr_Tron (#45)
#73. To: buckeroo (#64)
There are great benefits and advantages to being reasonable, sensible, inquisitive and open-minded
Isn't he the guy that sez something about the moon landings being faked?
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#74. To: buckeroo, wudidiz, Original_Intent (#73)
Isn't he the guy that sez something about the moon landings being faked?
"Greenhouse gases do not act as a blanket around the earth and they do not keep the atmosphere warm. ... greenhouse gases emit more radiation than they absorb and this ongoing radiation loss tends to cool the atmosphere at between 1C and 2C per day, a fact known for more than 50 years. And yet we continue to get the simplistic explanation that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere and so more greenhouse gases will warm the atmosphere more. No wonder the public is taken in!" --William Kininmonth, meteorologist , 1791
#75. To: farmfriend (#74)
#76. To: buckeroo (#75)
Oh. Just because of his "considered opinion" 'eh?
"Greenhouse gases do not act as a blanket around the earth and they do not keep the atmosphere warm. ... greenhouse gases emit more radiation than they absorb and this ongoing radiation loss tends to cool the atmosphere at between 1C and 2C per day, a fact known for more than 50 years. And yet we continue to get the simplistic explanation that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere and so more greenhouse gases will warm the atmosphere more. No wonder the public is taken in!" --William Kininmonth, meteorologist , 1791
#77. To: farmfriend (#76)
#78. To: buckeroo (#77)
Isn't that a bit like a circle jerk?
"Greenhouse gases do not act as a blanket around the earth and they do not keep the atmosphere warm. ... greenhouse gases emit more radiation than they absorb and this ongoing radiation loss tends to cool the atmosphere at between 1C and 2C per day, a fact known for more than 50 years. And yet we continue to get the simplistic explanation that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere and so more greenhouse gases will warm the atmosphere more. No wonder the public is taken in!" --William Kininmonth, meteorologist , 1791
#79. To: farmfriend (#78)
#80. To: buckeroo (#79)
"Greenhouse gases do not act as a blanket around the earth and they do not keep the atmosphere warm. ... greenhouse gases emit more radiation than they absorb and this ongoing radiation loss tends to cool the atmosphere at between 1C and 2C per day, a fact known for more than 50 years. And yet we continue to get the simplistic explanation that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere and so more greenhouse gases will warm the atmosphere more. No wonder the public is taken in!" --William Kininmonth, meteorologist , 1791
#81. To: farmfriend, Original_Intent (#80)
I have too much respect for him and his IQ to do that plus it is just too plausible.
#82. To: christine, Eric Stratton (#40)
doncha believe it? all that footage was lost. ;)
The best gun to have, is the gun you have, when you need a gun.
#83. To: buckeroo, Original_Intent (#81)
Are you saying his "considered opinion" is inarguable?
"Greenhouse gases do not act as a blanket around the earth and they do not keep the atmosphere warm. ... greenhouse gases emit more radiation than they absorb and this ongoing radiation loss tends to cool the atmosphere at between 1C and 2C per day, a fact known for more than 50 years. And yet we continue to get the simplistic explanation that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere and so more greenhouse gases will warm the atmosphere more. No wonder the public is taken in!" --William Kininmonth, meteorologist , 1791
#84. To: farmfriend, buckeroo, wudidiz (#74)
Isn't he the guy that sez something about the moon landings being faked?
#85. To: farmfriend (#83)
#86. To: buckeroo, Original_Intent (#85)
why are you so willing to prostrate yourself at the feet of OI?
"Greenhouse gases do not act as a blanket around the earth and they do not keep the atmosphere warm. ... greenhouse gases emit more radiation than they absorb and this ongoing radiation loss tends to cool the atmosphere at between 1C and 2C per day, a fact known for more than 50 years. And yet we continue to get the simplistic explanation that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere and so more greenhouse gases will warm the atmosphere more. No wonder the public is taken in!" --William Kininmonth, meteorologist , 1791
#87. To: farmfriend (#86)
#88. To: Original_Intent, buckeroo (#84)
Isn't he the guy that sez something about the moon landings being faked?
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#89. To: buckeroo (#81)
(Edited)
Are you saying his "considered opinion" is inarguable?
#90. To: wudidiz, farmfriend (#88)
(Edited)
#91. To: wudidiz (#88)
#92. To: buckeroo, wudidiz (#91)
#93. To: Original_Intent (#90)
I should take the time some day to do up a master reference post from different sites around the web.
#94. To: Original_Intent, buckeroo, farmfriend, all (#90)
However, not tonight - I'm pooped. I have been doing a stem to stern cleaning of my humble pad and rearranging everything to be more efficient and create more space.
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#95. To: IRTorqued, All (#82)
#96. To: wudidiz (#94)
... if I thought it would be productive I'd post some evidence to you.
#97. To: buckeroo (#96)
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." ~ Josh Billings
#98. To: wudidiz (#97)
#99. To: Eric Stratton (#95)
yet we're supposed to believe that in it was this ridiculous weight that negated the atmosphere delta;
#100. To: tom007 (#99)
#101. To: RickyJ (#100)
(Edited)
But, of course they couldn't do that becasue they were on Earth.
#102. To: tom007 (#101)
Kennedy was a coverup - the Moon landing was not.
#103. To: RickyJ (#102)
No man went to the moon, then, or since then.
#104. To: wudidiz, buckeroo, farmfriend, all (#94)
Organization is the key to efficiency.
buckeroo, if I thought it would be productive I'd post some evidence to you.
#105. To: Original_Intent (#104)
He [buckeroo] doesn't want to be confused with the facts.
.
.
.