[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Throttling Back on Afghanistan
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2 ... hrottling-back-on-afghanistan/
Published: Oct 20, 2009
Author: Jeff Huber
Post Date: 2009-10-20 06:24:25 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 59
Comments: 1

It was encouraging to see White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel throwing elbow punches in the Sunday political gabfests, defending the Obama’s decision to hold off on its decision on what to do about McChrystal’s flying-pie proposal to "Go Big" in a pseudo-classic counterinsurgency effort in Afghanistan. It would be "reckless," he told CNN, to pour more American blood into Afghanistan without knowing what the sneeze is going on with the government we’re supporting.

Journalist Gareth Porter brings news of another encouraging development. A paper on Afghanistan strategy by Daniel L. Davis, U.S. Army light colonel, offers an alternative to McChrystal’s plan that is receiving attention in important circles.

Davis’ "Go Big or Go Deep" [.pdf] argues that the massive, lengthy, costly counterinsurgency operation that McChrystal and his supporters in the neoconservative cabal insist we need to implement yesterday is unlikely to work.

For starters, Davis notes, 40,000 additional U.S. troops would not be enough. He’s not certain 100,000 additional troops would be enough. He’s right. The Afghan population will never support our counterinsurgency efforts, not if we send a billion troops to their rock-and-desert-heinied country. Afghan cabinet ministers are openly corrupt. It will be mid to late spring of 2010 before additional troops will arrive in Afghanistan, and that causes a logistical nightmare. The troops will be going into Afghanistan in the same time frame that we’ll be trying to remove the bulk of our troops from Iraq.

Hoping for an enlightened ruling class to emerge in Afghanistan is a pipe dream.

"The men who rule today have in most cases risen to power either through the application of violence or the application of money," Davis writes.

"[T]here are virtually no potential leaders in the education pipeline with which we could have near-term hope for meaningful change in how Afghanistan is governed."

McChrystal’s notion of training 400,000 Afghan troops is delusional. You can put that many folks in uniform and teach them to carry a rifle, but they need to be led, and as Davis notes, there is no potential for real leadership to sprout in Afghanistan.

It is already too late to win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people. They like the insurgents better than they like us and the crooked government that exists by virtue of us having our hand up its back.

Davis’ plan calls for withdrawal of the bulk of U.S. and NATO forces over the next 18 months. It leaves U.S. special force units and their support behind, and other troops for security and for training Afghan forces.

Davis himself alludes to the problem with his idea. As Porter notes, Davis "was surprised to hear from one official in a high position in Washington whose reaction to his paper was that what he is proposing in place of the ‘Go Big’ option is still ‘too big.’"

That’s good news too. Whoever this official in a high position was is thinking along sane lines.

An Oct. 19 AP story opened with "NATO’s 28 member states must quickly endorse U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s recommendation to send reinforcements to deal with the escalating insurgency in Afghanistan because time is not on the alliance’s side, its chief said Monday."

It then added that Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen says it "’makes sense’ to delay such decisions until the final results of Afghanistan’s disputed presidential elections are known."

This is typical of the lunacy that’s dancing laps around the body politic on the subject of Afghanistan these days.

President Barack Obama needs to get a handle on this situation very quickly. As journalist Seymour Hersh told an audience in North Carolina recently, the military is in a "war with the White House." The five-sided arms-sales generator has been running an information warfare campaign against Obama since mid-September, when a McClatchy article first suggested that petulant McChrystal might resign if he didn’t get every little and large thing he wanted.

The military feels it has Obama "boxed in," says Hersh. The military has everybody boxed in. It has been running a political and propaganda campaign to justify its existence since the end of the Cold War. The project it has been running to keep the Afghanistan war going has been Herculean. We had the McChrystal resignation talk, then we had the leaked McChrystal "assessment," then we had more sanctioned leaks that you can take a leak at about how unnamed military and civilian experts and officials say that Obama needs to bow down to his generals or Michael Rennie will step off his spaceship and give us a thorough spanking with his ray paddle.

It’s time for us to get Washingtonian in our foreign policy. Cramming a bunch more kids into a foreign country dressed in uniforms and armed with weapons that make them look like Germany’s Waffen SS is not the way for the United States to conduct global business.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

What mixed feelings it would engender on this forum if General Stanley McChrystal (perhaps the Scottish offspring of the late, great neocon Irving Kristol who just passed on to the Greater Israel in the sky) just went ahead and overthrew Obama and declared himself dictator of the new country of "Stanistan" and then poured in several hundred thousand new GIs and mercs (mostly the latter, since they are a more lucrative way to rob the taxpayers blind).

The Pentagon wants it ALL and they want it NOW! While codgers cry "socialism" at rallies and town hall forums, they make an exception for the largest socialistic enterprise on the planet — the U.S. military and its manifold corrupt contractors.

“I would give no thought of what the world might say of me, if I could only transmit to posterity the reputation of an honest man.” - Sam Houston

Sam Houston  posted on  2009-10-20   7:27:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]