See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Lunar Hoax Material
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/article/lunar-hoax-material
Published: Oct 24, 2009
Author: C2C
Post Date: 2009-10-24 19:28:33 by Kamala
Keywords: None
Views: 321
Comments: 8
Lunar Hoax Material October 23, 2009 Dr. Stephen Rorke, has provided a series of images related to the lunar hoax theory. Seen here is a side-by-side comparison of two photos, one taken in zero gravity and one allegedly taken in deep space, which look suspiciously similar. View the complete gallery of images here. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#1. To: Dr_Tron (#0)
Just occured to me, as this subject has been bouncing around.... My college roomate and good friend, Pete Hale was a physics major, interested in lasers - knew a lot about them even as an UGrad. His first job was with Lawrance Livermore Lab in New Mex - then went to work for a small tech company in Broomfield Colorado, specializing in lasers. I live close to Pikes Peak, see it every day. While visiting him a few years ago he told me that they bounced lasers off the top of PP from one of their remote labs and it was, 114.673 miles from them, or so, I surely can't remember the number. Then he mentioned that they also bounced lasers off reflectors purposely placed on the moon by the (one or all, I dunno) of the six landings that occured. Pete told me they bounced their lasers off them as well and measured the distance to a few inches or so. If Pete is in on the conspiracy - then the Pope assassinated John Lennon after he did JFK in. Besides, folks use a little sense here - Russia was watching all this closely - and if it were a hoax, Russia, which certainly has the power to tell if it were -would have called the US on it like white on rice. That there, really, is all the proof people need to see that this is nonsense. But look for yourself, google Moon landing laser reflectors or similar. I am against the MIC and CIA and all the rest, but I do believe in an objective reality, and the US landed men on the moon - Six Times. And No I am not going to endlessly counter all the perceived anomalies, due to the unfamiliar physical conditions encountered in that environment. If you want a real conspiracy, there's plenty to be had, NASA's got a few, but hoaxing the moon landings are not one of them.
If Pete is in on the conspiracy - then the Pope assassinated John Lennon after he did JFK in. Reflectors being on the moon is NOT proof man went there. Russia also place reflectors on the moon using robots. ... Russia did indeed say it was a hoax immediately. It was front page news in Russia a day after the supposed moon landings took place. It just wasn't reported by Western media. Ask yourself why not? ... Use some of your objective reality Tom and common sense and watch the video I posted. You will then hear a bag making a noise when touched by an astronaut, which according to NASA took place on the moon.
You are not interpreting the audio correctly. Here are a couple of sites to help get you started.
The debate is over. Landing sites imaged from lunar orbit:
There are no replies to Comment # 8. End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: farmfriend, Dr Tron (#1)
#5. To: tom007 (#2)
(Edited)
Pete told me they bounced their lasers off them as well and measured the distance to a few inches or so.
Besides, folks use a little sense here - Russia was watching all this closely - and if it were a hoax, Russia, which certainly has the power to tell if it were -would have called the US on it like white on rice.
I am against the MIC and CIA and all the rest, but I do believe in an objective reality, and the US landed men on the moon - Six Times.
#7. To: RickyJ (#5)
(Edited)
Use some of your objective reality Tom and common sense and watch the video I posted. You will then hear a bag making a noise when touched by an astronaut, which according to NASA took place on the moon.
#8. To: All (#7)
Replies to Comment # 8.