[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Baghdad car bombs near government offices kill 136
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 25, 2009
Author: yahoo
Post Date: 2009-10-25 10:03:08 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 367
Comments: 30

Baghdad car bombs near government offices kill 136 AP * Print

The dead body of a man is carried away from the blast scene after being killed AP – The dead body of a man is carried away from the blast scene after being killed by a massive bomb attack …

* Iraq Slideshow:Iraq * AP Top Stories Play Video Iraq Video:AP Top Stories AP * Car bombs kill dozens in Baghdad Play Video Iraq Video:Car bombs kill dozens in Baghdad AP

By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writer Qassim Abdul-zahra, Associated Press Writer – 14 mins ago

BAGHDAD, Iraq – Two suicide car bombs exploded in downtown Baghdad Sunday, killing at least 136 people and delivering a powerful blow to the heart of the fragile city's government in the worst attack of the year, officials said.

While violence has dropped dramatically in the country since the height of the sectarian tensions, such bombings like Sunday's demonstrate the precarious nature of the security gains and the insurgency's abilities to still pull off devastating attacks in the center of what is supposed to be one of Baghdad's most secure areas.

Black smoke could be seen billowing from the frantic scene, as emergency service vehicles sped to the area. Even civilian cars were being commandeered to transport the wounded to hospitals.

"The walls collapsed and we had to run out," said Yasmeen Afdhal, 24, an employee of the Baghdad provincial administration, which was targeted by one of the car bombs. "There are many wounded, and I saw them being taken away. They were pulling victims out of the rubble, and rushing them to ambulances."

The car bombs, which targeted the Justice Ministry and the Baghdad provincial administration, come as Iraq is preparing for elections scheduled this January, and many Iraqi officials have warned that violence by insurgents intent destabilizing the country could rise.

There have been no claims of responsibility so far, but massive car bombs have been the hallmark of the Sunni insurgents seeking to overthrow the country's Shiite-dominated government.

At least 25 staff members of the Baghdad Provincial Council, which runs the city, were killed in the bombing, said council member Mohammed al-Rubaiey.

The area where the blasts occurred is just a few hundred yards from the Green Zone that houses the U.S. Embassy as well as the prime minister's offices. The street where the blasts occurred had just been reopened to vehicle traffic a few months ago, in what was supposed to be a sign that safety was returning to the once devastated city.

The devastating attacks occurred just hours before Iraq's top leadership was scheduled to meet with heads of political parties on Sunday and reach a compromise on the disputed election law ahead of a crucial parliamentary vote in January.

The explosive-laden vehicles were sitting in parking garages next to the two government building, police said.

"They are targeting the government and the political process in the country," Maj. Gen. Qassim al-Mousawi, spokesman for the city's operations command center, told The Associated Press. He said the blasts were the work of suicide bombers who drove the vehicles into the parking lots, before blowing them up.

The blasts, which surpassed coordinated attacks against two government ministries in August that killed more than 100 people, appeared to be a blow to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki who has staked his reputation and re-election hopes on returning security to the country.

Al-Maliki toured the blast sites later in the day.

Sunday's explosions also injured nearly 600 people who were taken to six area hospitals. Medical officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media, gave the death toll.

Video images captured on a cell phone showed the second blast going off in a massive ball of flames, followed by a burst of machine gun fire.

"This is a political struggle, the price of which we are paying," said provincial council member al-Rubaiey. "Every politician is responsible and even the government is responsible, as well as security leaders."

Three American security contractors, working for the U.S. embassy in Baghdad were injured in the blasts, but no American embassy personnel were killed, said Philip Frayne, an embassy spokesman. Frayne could not immediately provide details about who the contractors were escorting to the site, which company they worked for or, or the nature of their injuries.

The explosions were just a few hundred yards from Iraq's Foreign Ministry which is still rebuilding after massive bombings there in August. The bombings were a devastating blow for a country that has seen a dramatic drop in violence since the height of the sectarian fighting in 2006 and 2007.

__

Associated Press Writer Rebecca Santana contributed to this story.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tom007 (#0) (Edited)

Baghdad car bombs near government offices kill 136 AP * Print

This does not square with official Washington that Iraq is now pacified and the future is all milk and honey.

Withdraw American troops and within a month their would be civil war, wall to wall in Iraq.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   10:11:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

Withdraw the American and British networks and things will stop going boom.

randge  posted on  2009-10-25   10:30:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: randge (#2)

Withdraw the American and British networks and things will stop going boom.

I fear civil war and sectarian warfare would tear the country apart until another Sadam surfaced, strong enough kill all in his path.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   10:33:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: All (#0)

unreasonablysafe.com/2009/10/10/obamapeac/

Obama awarded Nobel Peace Prize for his "peaceful approach" to war

Obama honored for making wars in Iraq and Afghanistan seem more peaceful

WASHINGTON D.C. - A shocked Obama woke up this morning to the news he had been awarded the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize. Obama was chosen for his 60;peaceful approach61; to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan said the Nobel Peace Prize election committee.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-10-25   10:36:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Cynicom (#3)

And this should upset my breakfast how?

There is nothing further that our presence can effect for good or ill there.

Not one more drop of the blood of our brothers in Mesopotamia or elsewhere.

Let the Iraqis settle their own hash.

randge  posted on  2009-10-25   10:39:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tom007 (#0)

I read just a few days ago a planted psyop story that the U.S. might have to postpone its scheduled withdrawals from Iraq because of the troubled election process.

This coming right on the heels of that propaganda tells me who is behind this.

The correct answer is that if "we" were to leave, "peace" would break out, not "civil war." "Peace" is the LAST THING desired by the MIC. This is their way of reminding "us" that they can do away with "peace" and extend the occupation at any time it suits them.

As I read on another forum, the U.S. is no longer a country. It is a military in search of a war(s).

“I would give no thought of what the world might say of me, if I could only transmit to posterity the reputation of an honest man.” - Sam Houston

Sam Houston  posted on  2009-10-25   10:50:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Sam Houston (#6)

As I read on another forum, the U.S. is no longer a country. It is a military in search of a war(s).

Bump that to the very top.

randge  posted on  2009-10-25   11:03:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Sam Houston, randge (#6)

As I read on another forum, the U.S. is no longer a country. It is a military in search of a war(s).

that's tagline material

christine  posted on  2009-10-25   11:09:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: randge (#5)

And this should upset my breakfast how?

Should make you want to march on Washington with a large club.

WW2 did NOT start on Dec. 7. It started years before that, bit by bit piece by piece, inch by inch. If you dare to, you can look down the road to see where this is leading.

Thats ok, you go back and enjoy your breakfast. (I KNOW what you can see)

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   11:40:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Cynicom (#9)

(I KNOW what you can see)

Yes, you know what I can see, and you know it ain't pretty.

I just wonder how they ginned up two world wars in such quick succession and have dithered and dallied about the inevitable sequel.

Perhaps they want to make sure that they provide us with a really big show.

randge  posted on  2009-10-25   11:47:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: christine, randge (#8)

that's tagline material

Wrong, wrong and you two know it.

Military in search of a war???? Total nonsense.

Profess it correctly,...A GOVERNMENT IN SEARCH OF A WAR...dont hang this BS on the military.

You have seen with your own eyes as late as a few weeks ago when the top and the bottom of the Army has...put obama and the government on notice...THEY WANT NO PART OF THIS.

Right now the military is the only hope of this country, barring Revolution or Civil War. We all know the civilian Americans have not the guts for either.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   11:49:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: randge (#10)

Yes, you know what I can see, and you know it ain't pretty.

Yes Sir, correct.

See my number 11, from one that remembers only too damn well the long march up to WW2, and..IT WAS NOT THE MILITARY LEADING THE WAY...it was the damned GOVERNMENT, hell bent on war.

Adm. Richardson was one that was fired and dishonored because he refused to go along with the government.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   11:54:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Cynicom (#11)

The U.S. is now "the MIC in search of a war" would be a better way to put it.

Most of the MIC will never hear a shot fired in anger.

If you seriously think General Stanley "Emperor of 'Stanistan'" McChrystal is not in search of more war, you haven't been paying attention.

“I would give no thought of what the world might say of me, if I could only transmit to posterity the reputation of an honest man.” - Sam Houston

Sam Houston  posted on  2009-10-25   12:01:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Sam Houston, Christine, randge, All (#13)

The U.S. is now "the MIC in search of a war" would be a better way to put it.

Sam...

You are attempting to lead people astray by trying to pin this war on the military, instead of Obama and the government. It wont work.

Childish maneuver.

If Eisenhower were alive today, he would modify his original statement to now include..GMIC...

At the time Ike was the government and he was not looking for war, and we had no war. Since then the government has led us into endless wars, not the military. Our military is NOT the Kwangtung Army.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   12:11:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Sam Houston, All (#13)

If you seriously think General Stanley "Emperor of 'Stanistan'" McChrystal is not in search of more war, you haven't been paying attention.

I was paying attention long before you were born, countless wars and never once was it the military...IT WAS THE GOVERNMENT. just as now.

Obamas owners want war and war we will have.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   12:13:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Sam Houston (#13)

If you seriously think General Stanley "Emperor of 'Stanistan'" McChrystal is not in search of more war, you haven't been paying attention.

McChrystal serves at the fascist Obama's pleasure. The moment he doesn't do as he's told, he'll be gone.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-10-25   12:17:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Cynicom (#14) (Edited)

Please, Cyni!

When has ONE significant military voice been raised against ANY of our modern globalist adventures, let alone against the current quagmires.

I'm still waiting for one of these STARS to do a Smedley Butler, even if from the safe vantage point of retirement.

I have heaps of contempt for the Current Occupant, but you cannot lay the blame for this on him. This impostor is as incapable of beginning or sustaining a war as he is of ending one.

randge  posted on  2009-10-25   12:20:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: randge, All (#17)

I have heaps of contempt for the Current Occupant, but you cannot lay the blame for this on him.

Surely if a person of your caliber honestly believes that, God help us, because we cannot help ourselves.

The man that sits in the Oval Office by nature receives all credit and all blame.

We had no problem with hanging this war around Bushes neck and rightfully so. Bush is gone. Obama sits there now and can end this nightmare any time he pleases.

McChrystal has laid his career on the line and will pay for it. Many grunts have spoken and they will quietly pay for their speaking the truth. I see no one in government saying anything.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   12:29:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: randge (#17)

randge...

In 1924 Gen. Mitchell spoke the truth, predicted WW2, how it would unfold and our government would be derelict.

He was dishonored and court martialed for his effort. Thousands of military men died and were written off...by the government...that wanted that war.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   12:34:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Jethro Tull (#16)

. The moment he doesn't do as he's told, he'll be gone.

This from a few days ago...

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates blamed the Taliban's revival on a past failure to deploy enough troops to Afghanistan and said U.S. forces would not withdraw whatever the result of President Barack Obama's strategy review.

Notice the contradiction there. Bush is to blame because he did NOT send enough troops to Afghan, yet Gates is a Bush appointee. Guess what???That shifts the blame for sending more troops from Obama to Bush.

Some people buy the sleight of hand. It is a rotten damned government, top to bottom.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   12:55:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Cynicom (#18)

Surely if a person of your caliber honestly believes that, God help us, because we cannot help ourselves.

I am but a small caliber.

I recognize that the Usurper has the power, technically, to end this. I think that he may even have an interest in doing so in that it would free up funds for the socializing agenda at home. However, the forces ranged against such a decision, should he desire to move in that direction, are huge.

But, yes, it is on him. But I would not lay the blame on him alone.

Can you give me some concrete evidence in the form of quotes, references, etc. in support of the contention that the leadership of the military TODAY is NOT in favor of the wars that we are currently engaged in? Or in the wider conflicts that are daily touted in this execrable, obsequious press of ours?

randge  posted on  2009-10-25   12:57:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: randge (#21)

But I would not lay the blame on him alone.

Can you give me some concrete evidence in the form of quotes, references, etc. in support of the contention that the leadership of the military TODAY is NOT in favor of the wars that we are currently engaged in? Or in the wider conflicts that are daily touted in this execrable, obsequious press of ours?

History, more history, always history.

The professional military more than deserves every knock it receives, I was not a military person but learned a lot in a few years.

Lets put it all in short context to remove the need for endless history lessons.

All military is by nature an instrument of "defense" under control of its government. Ike by his definition did not indicate the MIC as being agents of war and did not include government itself because he was in charge.

Currently I believe he would modify it to include government.

War...WW2, Pearl Harbor, thousands of military died because the military...KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THE INFORMATION ROOSEVELT HAD...

Korea...Truman decided on his own for MacArthur to rush to Korea and fight...MacArthur said, "with what"... and lost.

Vietnam..We all recall the Gulf of Tonkin resolution by the CONGRESS??? Once again the Army had nothing and lost.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   13:51:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Jethro Tull (#16)

McChrystal serves at the fascist Obama's pleasure. The moment he doesn't do as he's told, he'll be gone.

I think others have said or implied this on this thread, but I'll say it again.

Obama is a puppet and serves at the pleasure of the MIC (Gates seems to be the MIC spokesman; note he was "asked" to continue as a holdover from the Bush regime) and the banksters.

It's the moment Obama doesn't do as HE is told, not McChrystal. McChrystal works for Gates. Gates, as we see, goes on regardless of which puppet is in the Oval Office. He is lifetime career CIA.

“I would give no thought of what the world might say of me, if I could only transmit to posterity the reputation of an honest man.” - Sam Houston

Sam Houston  posted on  2009-10-25   14:12:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Cynicom (#3)

I recall seeing Diane Sawyer in Iraq filming Saddam standing in the street while Iraqis by the hundreds were buying ammo and weapons in view of the camera lens ... and I'm thinking even if this guy is a double, why hasn't someone shot him yet ?

It also seemed that there wasn't any waiting period or BS paperwork involved in procurring a weapon (in Iraq) ... unlike the free united states !!! hahahahaha !

The U.S. Govt has become a tyrannical butcher; U.S. taxpayers are accomplices to international murder and mayhem. If you satisfy your fears by bowing to this butcher, you forfeit your humanity and possibly your soul.

noone222  posted on  2009-10-25   15:17:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: noone222 (#24)

. unlike the free united states !!! hahahahaha

Everyone in the ME has a gun, including the kids.

If we were to leave the countries would dissolve into open warfare until another despot takes over.

So let 'em fight. Bring the troops home.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   15:21:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: noone222 (#24)

Friend of mine in Pentagon, did two tours in Iraq, a major in charge of some unit supposed to be training Iraqi policemen.

He said, "how can you train a man to be a cop, when you have to teach him basic personal hygiene first".

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   15:28:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Cynicom (#26)

Irrespective of what you pal suggests, why is America training cops in the first place? Because the American People voted ignorant leaders to create some sort of empire as though we can make friends with a mighty club?

“Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves.”

buckeroo  posted on  2009-10-25   15:48:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Cynicom (#26)

Friend of mine got out of his car in Saudi, and as he was locking his door, a cop car pulled up next to him and an officer got out on on the passenger side. As he did so, his revolver slipped out of his holster and went clattering onto the asphalt.

My buddy, an old ex-master sergeant, picked the weapon up and handed it back to the cop. He told him that it was a good idea to keep a holster buttoned up. He said the expression on the guy's face was priceless.

randge  posted on  2009-10-25   16:17:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: randge (#28)

He said the expression on the guy's face was priceless.

The Army tried to send my friend to Afghan, promised him Lt. Col. if he would "volunteer".

He refused, so now he is in a paper shuffling job. He said Americans have no idea how backward the majority of those people are.

I see now both Karzai and his opponent are putting pressure on Obama for more troops. The drumbeat goes on. Inch by inch.

Obama is in an untenable position, there is no winning, not even a draw.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-10-25   16:25:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Cynicom (#25)

So let 'em fight. Bring the troops home.

Gets my vote !

The U.S. Govt has become a tyrannical butcher; U.S. taxpayers are accomplices to international murder and mayhem. If you satisfy your fears by bowing to this butcher, you forfeit your humanity and possibly your soul.

noone222  posted on  2009-10-25   16:39:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]