See other Health Articles
Title: Obama's Daughters Forbidden From Taking H1N1 Vaccine
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 26, 2009
Author: LiveLeak
Post Date: 2009-10-26 07:17:15 by Disgusted
Keywords: None
Views: 337
Comments: 11
Obama's Daughters Forbidden From Taking H1N1 Vaccine Even though there's a lot of hype to take the h1n1 flu shot and even make it mandatory, no top-level politicians has taken it and President Barack Obama's daughters have been forbidden to take it because of the "potential risk", this was said by a Washington spokesman: "President Obama’s school age daughters have not been vaccinated against the H1N1 flu virus. White House Press Secret More..ary Robert Gibbs says the vaccine is not available to them based on their risk. The H1N1 flue vaccine contains mercury and another chemical that is blamed for causing autism in children, the greatest autism jump in history happened in the late 1970's in the USA when kids were given mandatory flu vaccines in schools during another flu scare in 1974. Obama has declared a 2009 H1N1 swine flu a national emergency. it is not The National Emergencies Act was passed in 1976. It has been extended six times. In 2007, the declaration was strengthened with the issuance of National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51) which gave the president authority to do whatever he deems necessary in vaguely defined "catastrophic emergency" from canceling elections to suspending the Constitution. NSPD-51 is unconstitutional. It was created on May 4, 2007, as a "presidential directive" (bypassing Congress) and signed by George W. Bush. It claims the power to execute procedures for continuity of the federal government in the event of a "catastrophic emergency." Such an emergency is construed as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions." In other words, it is a martial law directive. On May 10, 2007, The Washington Post characterized NSPD-51 is a "shadow government" directive. The John Warner National Defense Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2007 states that the military may be used during a "national emergency." Sec 1076 is extremely explicit, notes Michel Chossudovsky, and virtually creates a Pinochet style environment for the mass arrest of political dissidents without trial, the storming of public rallies, etc. NDAA specifically mentions "epidemic" as an excuse to declare martial law. ARTICLE
(5 images)October 26th, 2009 under Audio-Video, Commentary, Education, Events, Foreign and Domestic Intelligence, Health, Politics, Science and Technology, Shera Crossan, Top Stories. [ Comments: none ]
October 26th, 2009 under Economy, Foreign and Domestic Intelligence, Health, Israel & Jewish Issues, Nathaniel Bacon, Politics, Race, Top Stories. [ Comments: none ] 
clear if this declaration falls under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601-1651). The act is not mentioned in media reports.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Disgusted (#0)
deleted
I don't quite understand this. It's fine (I guess) to say that a President or VP wouldn't take these based on any kind of risk, even minimal. Ok, fine. But the kids? Wait..what? Are they destined to become queens after Obama passes or something? Otherwise, the "too risky" thing for them, and not others, makes zero sense. Unless, you know, the vaccine were much riskier than is being let on.
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
Leading by example? OK, come force me!
"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that its people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson
I'm kinda surprised she just didn't say the kids took it and send the journalists on their way.
even though He has declared a national state of emergency? well. well.
It's rather interesting to note that I've been hearing "health care professions" say, on the radio and in newspaper editorials, that they are being told to report *all* flu incidencts as "swine flu" regardless of whether they are or not. There be something really rotten going on here. I'm not even one of those who weigh against the vaccine because I'm against vaccines (since I'm not). It's just the really dark shady stuff going on that's making me say "no thanks" for my family and myself.
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
I heard the same thing from my daughter.
We are reporting them too. Influenza is a clinical diagnosis anyway and after 25 years of being a doctor, I know influenza when I see it. Our tests for flu are proving too inaccurate. We are getting lots of false negatives. The kids are getting hit hard and I have a 27 y/o in the ICU who may not make it.
deleted
deleted
There be something really rotten going on here. I'm not even one of those who weigh against the vaccine because I'm against vaccines (since I'm not). It's just the really dark shady stuff going on that's making me say "no thanks" for my family and myself. Interesting that you two should bring up concerns about this issue of "reporting /tracking procedures" re: cases of and deaths from swine flu. Based on past practices of the CDC tabulating flu deaths, and if the same model is used for tabulating swine flu cases and deaths, we may have a problem, Houston. Postscript: at the same url there are interesting articles about swine flu. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/12/051210120020.htm "Are U.S. Flu Death Figures More PR Than Science?" 12/10/05
#2. To: Eric Stratton (#1)
#3. To: Disgusted (#0)
Obama's Daughters Forbidden From Taking H1N1 Vaccine
#4. To: Eric Stratton (#1)
#5. To: Disgusted (#0)
#6. To: christine (#5)
#7. To: SonOfLiberty (#6)
It's rather interesting to note that I've been hearing "health care professions" say, on the radio and in newspaper editorials, that they are being told to report *all* flu incidencts as "swine flu" regardless of whether they are or not
#8. To: Jethro Tull (#7)
#9. To: SonOfLiberty (#2)
#10. To: Jethro Tull (#4)
#11. To: SonOfLiberty, Jethro Tull, TwentyTwelve, christine (#6)
It's rather interesting to note that I've been hearing "health care professions" say, on the radio and in newspaper editorials, that they are being told to report *all* flu incidents as "swine flu" regardless of whether they are or not.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest