Even though there's a lot of hype to take the h1n1 flu shot and even make it mandatory, no top-level politicians has taken it and President Barack Obama's daughters have been forbidden to take it because of the "potential risk", this was said by a Washington spokesman:
"President Obamas school age daughters have not been vaccinated against the H1N1 flu virus. White House Press SecretMore..ary Robert Gibbs says the vaccine is not available to them based on their risk.
The H1N1 flue vaccine contains mercury and another chemical that is blamed for causing autism in children, the greatest autism jump in history happened in the late 1970's in the USA when kids were given mandatory flu vaccines in schools during another flu scare in 1974.
Obama has declared a 2009 H1N1 swine flu a national emergency. it is not clear if this declaration falls under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601-1651). The act is not mentioned in media reports.
The National Emergencies Act was passed in 1976. It has been extended six times. In 2007, the declaration was strengthened with the issuance of National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51) which gave the president authority to do whatever he deems necessary in vaguely defined "catastrophic emergency" from canceling elections to suspending the Constitution.
NSPD-51 is unconstitutional. It was created on May 4, 2007, as a "presidential directive" (bypassing Congress) and signed by George W. Bush. It claims the power to execute procedures for continuity of the federal government in the event of a "catastrophic emergency." Such an emergency is construed as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."
In other words, it is a martial law directive. On May 10, 2007, The Washington Post characterized NSPD-51 is a "shadow government" directive.
The John Warner National Defense Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2007 states that the military may be used during a "national emergency." Sec 1076 is extremely explicit, notes Michel Chossudovsky, and virtually creates a Pinochet style environment for the mass arrest of political dissidents without trial, the storming of public rallies, etc. NDAA specifically mentions "epidemic" as an excuse to declare martial law. ARTICLE
I don't quite understand this. It's fine (I guess) to say that a President or VP wouldn't take these based on any kind of risk, even minimal. Ok, fine. But the kids? Wait..what? Are they destined to become queens after Obama passes or something? Otherwise, the "too risky" thing for them, and not others, makes zero sense. Unless, you know, the vaccine were much riskier than is being let on.